Limited sorafenib anticancer effects on primary cultured hepatocellular carcinoma cells with high NANOG expression.

Cancer stem cell is considered as an important cause to exacerbate the prognosis. NANOG and POU5F1 are markers for cancer stem cells. The associations between NANOG and POU5F1 expressions with the sorafenib anticancer effects in primary cultured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells were investigated. Eight primary cultured HCC parent cell lines and 13 subgroups established by flow cytometric sorting using NANOG and POU5F1 as targets were investigated with clinically achievable sorafenib plasma concentrations (5 and 10 µg/mL). Sorafenib showed obvious downregulation of RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathways and dose-dependent anti-proliferative effects only on s003 parent cell line, which showed the lowest expression of NANOG among all tested cell lines except one downregulated NANOG with upregulated POU5F1 s020 subgroup. Sorafenib also inhibited proliferation in this s020 subgroup but promoted proliferation in its parent cell line. For the only one downregulated NANOG alone s015 subgroup, sorafenib which had no influence on its parent cell line inhibited proliferation in this subgroup. Only the above three cell lines could demonstrate sorafenib antiproliferative effects. On the contrary, sorafenib promoted proliferation in three (s003, s015, s071) out of four upregulated NANOG alone subgroups. On the other hand, Sorafenib showed diverse influence on proliferation among four upregulated POU5F1 alone subgroups. In conclusion, NANOG rather than POU5F1 expression is a critical marker for the anticancer effects of sorafenib on HCC. The sorafenib anticancer effects on HCC cells with high NANOG expression were limited. Sorafenib should be combined with other drug able to target cancer cells with high NANOG expression.

Regorafenib for Taiwanese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib failure: Impact of alpha-fetoprotein levels.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Regorafenib has demonstrated its survival benefit for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients in a phase III clinical trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of regorafenib and the predictors of treatment outcomes in Taiwanese patients. METHODS: We analyzed the survival, best overall response, predictors of treatment outcomes, and safety for uHCC patients who had tumor progression on sorafenib therapy and received regorafenib as salvage therapy between March 2018 and November 2020. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with uHCC were enrolled (median age, 66.5 years; 76.7% male). The median regorafenib treatment duration was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-4.6). The most frequently reported adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (44.2%), diarrhea (36.0%), and fatigue (29.1%). No unpredictable toxicity was observed during treatment. The median overall survival (OS) with regorafenib was 12.4 months (95% CI, 7.8-17.0) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.7-4.7). Of 82 patients with regorafenib responses assessable, 4 patients (4.9%) achieved a partial response, and 33 (40.2%) had stable disease, leading to a disease control rate (DCR) of 45.1% (n = 37). Patients possessing baseline AFP < 400 ng/ml exhibited a markedly longer median OS, median PFS, and higher DCR compared with their counterparts (15.7 vs. 8.1 months, 4.6 vs. 3.7 months, 60.9% vs. 27.5%, respectively). Despite possessing high baseline AFP levels, patients with early AFP response (>10% reduction at 4 weeks or >20% reduction at 8 weeks after regorafenib administration) exhibited comparable treatment outcomes to those with baseline AFP < 400 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this real-world study verified the tolerability and efficacy of regorafenib treatment for uHCC patients who failed prior sorafenib therapy, especially for those with lower baseline AFP levels or with early AFP response.

Significant amelioration of hepatitis C virus infection in a hyperendemic area: longitudinal evidence from the COMPACT Study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. Tzukuan, located in the southwestern area of Taiwan, is an HCV hyperendemic area (>30%). This study aimed to assess the changing epidemiological characteristics of HCV infection and to evaluate the long-term outcomes after the implementation of public health strategies for two decades. DESIGN: A population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A comprehensive care programme was implemented, namely COMPACT Study, in Tzukuan since 1997. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10 714 residents participated the screening. OUTCOME MEASURES: The HCV status, demographic and clinical profiles of the participants were recorded and validated annually from 2000 through 2019. RESULTS: The HCV infection prevalence rates were 21.1% (1076/5099) in 2000-2004, 18.8% (239/1269) in 2005-2009, 14.1% (292/2071) in 2010-2014 and 10.3% (234/2275) in 2015-2019 (p for trend test <0.0001). Among them, 1614 underwent repeated tests during the follow-up period. The annual incidence rates were 0.54% in 2005-2009, 0.4% in 2010-2014 and 0.22% in 2015-2019, respectively (p=0.01). In addition to old age, lower education level was a major risk factor for HCV infection across different periods. HCV infection prevalence rate among those illiterates reached 40.9%, followed by 28.5% in those with elementary school level, and <10% in those with high school or higher levels. The major risk factor has shifted from iatrogenic exposure in 2000-2009 to household transmission after 2010. CONCLUSIONS: HCV infection has been decreasing and the epidemiological features are changing in the hyperendemic area by continuing education, prevention and treatment strategies.

Potential of novel colchicine dosage schedule for the palliative treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Previous in vitro and in vivo experiments had demonstrated dose-dependent anti-cancer effects of clinical plasma colchicine concentrations on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. This phase IIa trial was to evaluate the potential efficiency and safety of our novel colchicine dosage schedule for the palliative treatment of advanced HCC. The dosage schedule started from oral intake of 1 mg colchicine three times per day for 4 days and discontinuation in the following 3 days (one cycle). The treatment cycle was repeated and the dosage was adjusted ranging from 3 to 1.5 mg/day according to the condition of the participant. The control group was originated from chart review of 86 HCC patients treated by sorafenib for more than 2 months. Fifteen participants signed the inform consent. Two participants were excluded due to screening failure in one and less than four treatment cycles in another. For severe adverse events, the colchicine group demonstrated higher incidence of biliary tract obstruction (p = 0.0184) than the sorafenib group. Comparison grade 1 or 2 adverse events between two groups, the colchicine group had higher incidence of diarrhea (p = 0) and the sorafenib group had higher incidence of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (p = 0.0045). There was no significant difference in mortality, median survival, and overall survival between two groups (all p > 0.2). In conclusion, our novel colchicine dosage schedule is clinically feasible and has the potential to be applied in the palliative treatment of advanced HCC especially based on the cost-effectiveness consideration.

The prognostic factors between different viral etiologies among advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving sorafenib treatment.

Sorafenib is currently the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) patients. However, the outcomes and prognostic factors of sorafenib therapy have not been well investigated. We aimed to investigate the pretreatment factors and outcomes among Taiwanese aHCC patients receiving sorafenib treatment. A total of 347 patients with aHCC and well-compensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A) status receiving sorafenib were consecutively enrolled from March 2013 through December 2016. Pre-treatment clinical data and viral hepatitis markers were collected and analyzed with their outcomes. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival. The factors associated with overall survival were also investigated. The median overall survival of all the patients was 238 days (range, 9-1504 days) with a 1-year overall survival of 43.2%. Positive hepatitis B surface antigen and absence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) were independent factors associated with better overall survival. The median duration of sorafenib therapy was 93.0 days (range, 4-1504 days). After stopping sorafenib, the median survival was 93.0 days (range, 1-1254 days). The 1-year survival after stopping sorafenib was 21.2%. In chronic hepatitis B patients, total bilirubin level was the only factor associated with overall survival. Hepatitis C antibody RNA negativity, tumor size, PVT, and white blood cell count were the independent factors associated with survival among those chronic hepatitis C patients. There were different prognostic factors stratified by viral etiologies in aHCC patients receiving sorafenib. Viral eradication increased survival in chronic hepatitis C patients.

Integrated care for methadone maintenance patients with hepatitis C virus infection.

The majority of patients undergoing methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) are neither examined nor treated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We aimed to evaluate an integrated referral model in the management of HCV among MMT patients. This retrospective study included 390 HCV-infected MMT patients between April 2015 and May 2017. Patients who tested positive for HCV antibodies were referred to a liver clinic by MMT case managers or psychiatrists. Patients who agreed to receive anti-HCV treatment were treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The rate of patient engagement at a liver clinic increased from 14.1% to 58.2% after integrated care. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that higher education level (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.60) and elevated ALT level (OR, 4.30; 95% CI, 2.70-6.85) were independently associated with patients who accepted referral. Active drug use (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.85) was inversely associated with referral acceptance. Of the 112 patients who met the criteria for anti-HCV therapy, 66 (58.9%) were treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Finally, the rate of treatment completion and sustained virological response (SVR) was 65.2% and 54.5%, respectively, among the 66 patients. Treatment completion (OR, 39.67; 95% CI, 7.80-201.62) was found to be the only independent factor associated with SVR achievement. Although integrated care by psychiatrists and hepatologists significantly increased the rates of engagement and acceptance of antiviral treatment for HCV-infected MMT patients, only a minority of MMT patients achieved successful treatment.

Identification of groups with poor cost-effectiveness of peginterferon plus ribavirin for naïve hepatitis C patients with a real-world cohort and database.

BACKGROUND: For decades, peginterferon and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) have been the standard-of-care for chronic hepatitis C virus (CHC) infection. However, the actual cost-effectiveness of this therapy remains unclear. We purposed to explore the real-world cost effectiveness for subgroups of treatment-naïve CHC patients with PegIFN/RBV therapy in a large real-world cohort using a whole population database. METHODS: A total of 1809 treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients (829 HCV genotype 1 [G1] and 980 HCV G2) treated with PegIFN/RBV therapies were linked to the National Health Insurance Research Database, covering the entire population of Taiwan from 1998 to 2013 to collect the total medical-care expenses of outpatient (antiviral agents, nonantiviral agents, laboratory, and consultation costs) and inpatient (medication, logistic, laboratory, and intervention costs) visits. The costs per treatment and the cost per sustained virological response (SVR) achieved were calculated. RESULTS: The average medical-care cost was USD $4823 (±$2984) per treatment and $6105 (±$3778) per SVR achieved. With SVR rates of 68.6% and 87.8%, the cost/SVR was significantly higher in G1 than those in G2 patients, respectively ($8285 vs $4663, P < .001). Treatment-naïve G1 patients of old ages, those with advanced fibrosis, high viral loads, or interleukin-28B unfavorable genotypes, or those without a rapid virological response (RVR: undetectable HCV RNA at week 4), or those with complete early virological response (cEVR: undetectable HCV RNA at week 12). Treatment-naïve G2 patients with high viral loads or without RVR or cEVR incurred significantly higher costs per SVR than their counterparts. The cost/SVR was extremely high among patients without RVR and in patients without cEVR. CONCLUSION: We investigated the real-world cost effectiveness data for different subgroups of treatment-naïve HCV patients with PegIFN/RBV therapies, which could provide useful, informative evidence for making decisions regarding future therapeutic strategies comprising costly direct-acting antivirals.

Risk factors for the leakage of chemotherapeutic agents into systemic circulation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

This prospective study was to investigate the possible risk factors for the leakage of chemotherapeutic agent into the systemic circulation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Peripheral plasma concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents were determined at 1 hour and 72 hours after TACE by high-performance liquid chromatography in 53 patients. HCC were divided into three types namely single nodule (<5cm), multiple nodules (all <5cm), and main nodule measuring 5cm or more. Forty-four patients (83%) showed detectable chemotherapeutic concentrations within 72 hours after TACE. Patients with single nodular-type HCC had lower incidence of detectable plasma chemotherapeutic agents after TACE than the other two groups (all p<0.05). The injected doses of lipiodol, epirubicin, and mitomycin C were lower in patients without detection than in patients with detectable chemotherapeutic agents (all p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression showed that tumor type and injected dose of lipiodol were two independent risk factors for the leakage of mitomycin C at 1 hour after TACE (all p<0.05), and the injected dose of mitomycin C was the risk factor for the leakage of epirubicin at 1 hour after TACE (p<0.05). In conclusion, multiple nodular type and large nodule measuring 5cm or more have a risk of leakage of mitomycin C after TACE. Injected dose of lipiodol and mitomycin C as risk factor for the leakage of mitomycin C and epirubicin respectively may be because of competition of their injected volume within the limited space of target.