Using the patient-acceptable symptom state to evaluate patients' perspectives of living with psoriasis: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Taking the perspectives of patients into consideration is of the utmost importance when defining treatment goals for psoriasis. The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a dichotomised question that captures patients' perceptions of their overall health state. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate PASS and determine the factors associated with a satisfactory PASS for psoriatic patients. METHODS: Three questions were asked: (Q1) Considering the ways that your skin symptoms affect your functioning, is your current skin psoriasis satisfactory? (Current PASS), (Q2) Considering the ways that your psoriasis is affecting you, if you were to remain in this state for the next few months, would this be satisfactory? (Future PASS) and (Q3) If you were to remain for the rest of your life as you were during the last 48 hours, would this be satisfactory? (Lifelong PASS). Disease severity, symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were collected. RESULTS: Of 140 patients, 74.3%, 70.0% and 85.7% expressed satisfaction with their current, future and lifelong skin psoriasis conditions respectively. A satisfactory PASS was significantly associated with older and married patients; lower disease severity; fewer skin symptoms; and a higher HRQoL. A multivariate analysis revealed that the independent factors associated with a satisfactory PASS were being older than 40 years, being married, practising meditation, not having extensive lesions at sensitive areas and having a high HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: PASS is a simple and easily administered questionnaire that reflects both disease severity and HRQoL. Understanding patients' needs and satisfaction levels will result in better care for psoriatic patients than otherwise.

Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic, relapsing dermatitis, is characterized by dry and pruritus skin in patients with a personal or family history of atopy. It affects up to 20% of children and 1-3% of adults in most countries worldwide, and leads to significant treatment costs and morbidity. These guidelines are developed in accordance with evidence-based publications and expert opinions. Following simple algorithms, the guidelines aim to assist adult and pediatric physicians in the better care of patients with AD. As with other diseases, there have been several diagnosis criteria proposed over time. Nonetheless, the classical Hanifin and Rajka criterion with no pathognomonic laboratory biomarkers is still the most widely used worldwide for the diagnosis of AD. The management of AD must be considered case by case to provide suitable care for each patient. Basic therapy is focused on avoiding specific/unspecific provoking factors and hydrating skin. Topical anti-inflammatory treatments such as glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors are suggested for disease flare, and proactive therapy is best for long-term control. Other therapies, including antimicrobial agents, systemic antihistamines, systemic anti-inflammatory agents, immunotherapy, phototherapy, and psychotherapy, are reviewed in these guidelines. Crisaborole, a new topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, can be used twice daily in AD patients over three months old. Dupilumab, a biological drug for patients with moderate-to-severe AD, may be considered in patients with no improvement from other systemic treatments.

The efficacy of UVA1 phototherapy in psoriasis: Clinical and histological aspects.

BACKGROUND: Although ultraviolet A1 (UVA1) phototherapy is available for nearly 30 years, only few studies have been conducted for plaque-type psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of UVA1 phototherapy in psoriasis by assessing the clinical and histological outcomes. METHODS: This open study enrolled 15 patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis. All of the patients had skin type IV. A whole-body UVA1 device consisting of 24 lamps, was irradiated at a medium dose of 50 J/cm2 three-times weekly for 30 sessions. Topical and systemic psoriasis treatments were discontinued before and during treatment; patients could only use emollients and antihistamines until 1-month post-completion. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores were determined at baseline; at sessions 10th, 20th and 30th; and 1 month after treatment. Four-millimetre punch biopsies were obtained from the same psoriasis lesion at baseline and session 30th. Changes in histopathological gradings and polymorphonuclear, lymphocyte and Langerhans cell numbers were monitored. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the study. The mean age was 41.3 years (range: 25-71). The median PASI scores at baseline, session 30th and 1-month post-treatment were 16 (8.2, 43.3), 11 (4.4, 43.3) and 9.2 (2.7, 36.4), respectively. Although the PASI scores had improved significantly by 1-month post-treatment (P = .006), the histological parameters demonstrated minimal changes. All patients tolerated the phototherapy well and the most common side effect was skin tanning. CONCLUSIONS: While medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy demonstrated some efficacy in moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis. However, it might not be an excellent choice.

Relationship between vitamin D and chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D has been reported to be associated with many allergic diseases. There are a limited number of the studies of vitamin D supplementation in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). This study aims to study the relationship between vitamin D and CSU in terms of serum vitamin D levels, and the outcomes of vitamin D supplementation. METHODS: A literature search of electronic databases for all relevant articles published between 1966 and 2018 was performed. The systematic literature review was done following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis recommendations. RESULTS: Seventeen eligible studies were included. Fourteen (1321 CSU cases and 6100 controls) were concerned with serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients. Twelve studies showed statistically significant lower serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients than the controls. Vitamin D deficiency was reported more commonly for CSU patients (34.3-89.7%) than controls (0.0-68.9%) in 6 studies. Seven studies concerned with vitamin D supplementation in CSU patients showed disease improvement after high-dosages of vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSION: CSU patients had significantly lower serum vitamin D levels than the controls in most studies. However, the results did not prove causation, and the mechanisms were not clearly explained. Despite the scarcity of available studies, this systematic review showed that a high dosage of vitamin D supplementation for 4-12 weeks might help to decrease the disease activity in some CSU patients. Well-designed randomized placebo-controlled studies are needed to determine the cut-off levels of vitamin D for supplementation and treatment outcomes.

Assessing the validity and response distribution of the simplified psoriasis index in patients receiving phototherapy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The simplified psoriasis index (SPI) is a three-part multidimensional tool incorporating disease severity, psychosocial impact and historical course completed by the health-care professional (professional SPI, [proSPI]) or the patient (self-assessment SPI, [saSPI]). We aimed to assess the validity and response distribution of proSPI and saSPI in patients with psoriasis undergoing phototherapy. METHODS: The validity and response distribution of SPI was assessed by recording saSPI and proSPI in patients with psoriasis before and after a course of phototherapy. Recruitment ended once 100 complete data sets were available for analysis. RESULTS: Altogether 52 of the 100 patients evaluated were male and most (93) underwent narrowband UVB phototherapy. There was a close correlation between the proSPI-current severity score (proSPI-s) with the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score (r = 0.76, r = 0.86) before and after treatment, respectively. Although pretreatment correlation between the saSPI-current severity score (saSPI-s) and PASI was weak (r = 0.39), a more close correlation was noted at the end of treatment (r = 0.50). A moderate correlation was observed between the SPI-psychosocial impact score (SPI-p) and the dermatology life quality index (DLQI), both before and after phototherapy (r = 0.64, r = 0.73). The SPI had wide response distributions in all three domains. CONCLUSIONS: Both versions of SPI demonstrated wide response distributions and the proSPI-s in particular was shown to have good validity with PASI.

The Simplified Psoriasis Index (SPI): a practical tool for assessing psoriasis.

The Simplified Psoriasis Index (SPI) is a summary measure of psoriasis with separate components for current severity (SPI-s), psychosocial impact (SPI-p), and past history and interventions (SPI-i). It derives from the Salford Psoriasis Index but replaces Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) with a composite weighted severity score designed to reflect the impact of psoriasis affecting functionally or psychosocially important body sites. Two complementary versions are available, differing only in that current severity (SPI-s) is either professionally (proSPI-s) or patient self-assessed (saSPI-s). This study examined the criterion and construct validity and response distribution of proSPI-s, saSPI-s, and SPI-p in 100 patients with plaque psoriasis. A further 50 patients were assessed for test-retest reliability of these three components. Interrater reliability of proSPI-s was assessed in 12 patients, each assessed by 12 assessors (144 assessments). There was close correlation between PASI and proSPI-s (r=0.91); SPI-p was closely correlated with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (r=0.89). Strong intrarater (proSPI-s, saSPI-s, SPI-p, and SPI-i) and interrater (proSPI-s) reliability was demonstrated (all intraclass correlation coefficients >0.75). There were wide response distributions for all three components. We believe that both professional (proSPI) and self-assessed (saSPI) versions can readily be introduced into routine clinical practice.