Retrospective analysis of real-world data to determine clinical outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer following cell-free circulating tumor DNA genomic profiling.

OBJECTIVES: Liquid biopsy and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are increasingly used for detection of targetable genomic alterations (GA) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To examine the clinical outcomes for patients following CGP using liquid biopsy versus tissue biopsy, receipt of matched targeted therapy post-CGP and associated outcomes were evaluated in the real-world setting. METHODS: 6491 patients with NSCLC and liquid biopsy (N = 937 tests) and/or tissue (N = 5582 tests) CGP were included in a de-identified commercial clinico-genomic database. Targetable GAs included National Comprehensive Cancer Network NSCLC guideline biomarkers. Clinical characteristics, real-world progression, and real-world response (rwR) were obtained via technology-enabled abstraction of clinician notes and radiology/pathology reports. RESULTS: At the time of liquid biopsy CGP, 53% (496/937) of patients were documented to have received ≥1 line of prior therapy (tissue CGP: 13%, 735/5582). 90% (832/928) of liquid biopsy cases had evidence of ctDNA. A targetable GA was detected in 20% (188/937) of liquid biopsy and 22% (1215/5582) of tissue CGP cases. Use of matched targeted therapy overall was similar post-liquid biopsy or post-tissue CGP but varied considerably across emerging (25%, 79/317) versus standard of care (SOC) (74%, 475/640) GA. Real-world-progression free survival for patients receiving SOC first line matched targeted therapy administered following liquid biopsy (n = 33) and tissue (n = 229) CGP were similar (13.8 vs 10.6 months; aHR = 0.68 [0.36-1.26]). Among patients evaluated for rwR, overall response rate (partial/complete response) to matched targeted therapy post-liquid biopsy CGP was 75% (39/52) versus 66% post-tissue CGP (254/385, P = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Retrospective analysis of real-world clinico-genomic data demonstrated that clinical outcomes on matched targeted therapy were similar following liquid biopsy and tissue CGP in NSCLC, which suggests routine clinical use of liquid biopsy CGP can reliably guide therapy selection.

Genomic profiling of cell-free circulating tumor DNA in patients with colorectal cancer and its fidelity to the genomics of the tumor biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy offers the ability to non-invasively analyze the genome of a tumor through circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to identify targetable and prognostic genomic alterations. Few studies have rigorously analyzed ctDNA results and determined the fidelity with which they recapitulate the genomics of a sequenced tissue sample obtained from the same tumor. The clinical utility study (CUS) for the FoundationACT™ ctDNA assay (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA; NCT02620527) is a multi-center prospective clinical study for multiple solid tumor types to compare genomic profiling of paired tissue and blood samples from the same patient. In this subset of the study, paired specimens from 96 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) were analyzed with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of the tumor tissue sample (FoundationOne®) and blood sample (FoundationACT™). METHODS: Both samples underwent CGP using the hybrid capture-based Illumina Hi-Seq technology. Maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) was used to estimate the fraction of ctDNA in the sample. The set of genes and targeted regions common to both tumor and liquid were compared for each subject. RESULTS: Among these patients, 61% were male; 74% had clinical stage IV disease, 19% had clinical stage III disease, and 7% had clinical stage II disease. Time between the tissue biopsy and liquid biopsy (range, 0-709 days) had a significant impact on the positive percent agreement (PPA) between the two assays. Eighty percent of cases had evidence of ctDNA in the blood (MSAF >0). For all cases with MSAF >0, 171 base substitutions and insertions/deletions (indels) were identified in the tumor, and 79% (PPA) of these identical alterations were also identified in matched ctDNA samples; PPA increased to 87% for cases <270 days between the tissue and liquid biopsy, 95% for <90 days, and 100% PPA for <30 days. All known and likely short variants in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were analyzed independently as testing of these genes is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for patients with CRC and have therapeutic implications. For NCCN genes, PPA was 80% for all time points for short variants; PPA increased to 90% for cases <270 days between the tissue and liquid biopsy. There was high concordance for KRAS G12X between tissue and liquid: overall percent agreement (97%), PPA (93%), negative percent agreement (NPA) (100%), positive predictive value (PPV) (100%), and negative predictive value (NPV) (96%) for the <270 day cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In cases where tumor tissue profiling is not possible, these results provide compelling evidence that genomic profiling of ctDNA in late stage CRC shows a high concordance with tumor tissue sequencing results and can be used to identify most clinically relevant alterations capable of guiding therapy for these patients.

Delivering Precision Oncology in a Community Cancer Program: Results From a Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Precision oncology (PO) is a growing treatment approach in the era of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and matched therapies. Effective delivery of PO in the community has not been extensively studied. Our program developed a virtual molecular tumor board (MTB) strategy to help guide PO care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 18 months, eligible adult patients with advanced, incurable solid tumor malignancies were enrolled in a molecular profiling (MP) study using the Foundation Medicine NGS panel. Results were reviewed through a weekly, videoconferenced MTB conducted across our largely rural integrated health system. Recommendations from the MTB were used to identify actionable alterations (AAs). Feasibility of PO care delivery was assessed as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of AAs, genomic matched treatments, genomic matched clinical trial enrollment, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 120 participants with a variety of advanced tumor types were enrolled. Of these, 109 (90.8%) had successful MP. Treatment on the basis of an AA was recommended by the MTB in 58% of patients (63 of 109) who had a successful MP result. For those completing MP, treatments included enrollment in a genomic matched clinical trial (n = 16; 14.6%) and genomic matched treatment with a Food and Drug Administration-approved agent (n = 23; 21.1%). Response and survival data were similar regardless of the matched treatment option chosen. CONCLUSION: A video-conferenced MTB-facilitated NGS testing and treatment delivery system was implemented in our integrated community oncology program. Continued use of this model aims to increase understanding of the impact of PO in this setting.