Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 147(4 Suppl): S76-81, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25836347

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we evaluated changes in lingual enamel roughness due to sandblasting with 27-, 50-, and 90-µm aluminum oxide particles followed by 37% orthophosphoric acid etching. METHODS: Twenty-four maxillary premolars were included in the study. The lingual enamel roughness of 20 teeth was evaluated using a laser confocal microscope before and after enamel conditioning. Group 1 (control) was etched with 37% orthophosphoric acid; groups 2, 3, and 4 were sandblasted with 27-, 50-, and 90-µm aluminum oxide particles, respectively, before acid etching. The lingual surfaces of the other 4 teeth were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy after they had received one of the conditioning methods under study. Paired t tests were used to compare the roughness parameters obtained before and after conditioning in each group, and 1-way analysis of variance was used to compare the surface roughness between groups. The significance level was set at 5% for all statistical analyses. RESULTS: The 4 conditioning methods significantly increased the roughness of the lingual enamel. However, the roughness increases in the groups that were sandblasted with 27-, 50-, and 90-µm aluminum oxide particles before orthophosphoric acid etching were statistically greater than was the increase in the group conditioned only with orthophosphoric acid. Scanning electron microscopy showed different conditioning patterns among specimens that were conditioned only with orthophosphoric acid and those sandblasted with aluminum oxide before acid etching. CONCLUSIONS: Lingual enamel conditioning with aluminum oxide sandblasting before acid etching results in greater roughness and produces a conditioning pattern different from that of acid etching alone.


Asunto(s)
Grabado Ácido Dental/métodos , Óxido de Aluminio/química , Esmalte Dental/ultraestructura , Grabado Dental/métodos , Ácidos Fosfóricos/química , Humanos , Microscopía Confocal , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Tamaño de la Partícula
2.
Angle Orthod ; 84(6): 1068-73, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24813325

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare bond strength and bond failure location of lingual brackets indirectly bonded after lingual enamel sandblasting with 27-, 50-, and 90-µm aluminum oxide particles followed by 37% phosphoric acid etching. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty maxillary premolars were randomly divided into four equal groups according to the method of lingual enamel surface conditioning: Group 1 (control) was etched with 37% phosphoric acid, and group 2, group 3, and group 4 were sandblasted with 27-, 50-, and 90-µm aluminum oxide particles, respectively, prior to acid etching. Lingual brackets were indirectly bonded using the same protocol and adhesive (Sondhi) in all groups. The maximum shear bond strength required to debond the brackets was measured using a testing machine, and the bond failure location was classified according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Analysis of variance was used to compare the mean bond strength between groups. The differences between ARI scores were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in mean shear bond strength or ARI scores between the four enamel-conditioning procedures. CONCLUSION: Lingual enamel sandblasting using different particle sizes of aluminum oxide prior to phosphoric acid etching did not increase the shear bond strength of indirectly bonded brackets and did not affect the amount of adhesive remnant on the enamel.


Asunto(s)
Grabado Ácido Dental/métodos , Óxido de Aluminio/química , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/métodos , Esmalte Dental/ultraestructura , Grabado Dental/métodos , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Ácidos Fosfóricos/química , Adhesividad , Diente Premolar/ultraestructura , Análisis del Estrés Dental/instrumentación , Humanos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Cementos de Resina/química , Resistencia al Corte , Estrés Mecánico , Propiedades de Superficie
3.
Spec Care Dentist ; 31(6): 197-203, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22070358

RESUMEN

When planning the dental treatment of patients with Down syndrome (DS), dental practitioners should always consider their general health, in order to achieve a holistic and interdisciplinary approach. This article presents a literature review of the primary medical conditions in patients with DS that may affect their general health care and the appropriate clinical delivery of oral health care.


Asunto(s)
Atención Dental para la Persona con Discapacidad , Síndrome de Down/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Boca/terapia , Enfermedades Dentales/terapia , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Humanos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Grupo de Atención al Paciente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA