Tolerance and short-term effect of a cluster schedule with pollen-extracts quantified in mass-units.

We performed a prospective, multicenter study to assess the tolerance and possible short-term effects of allergen vaccines administered according to a cluster schedule in the months immediately preceding the onset of the pollen season. The study was carried out in eight centers and included 191 patients (children and adults) with allergic respiratory disease due to sensitization to olive tree and/or grass pollen. Of these, 34 patients acted as controls and the remaining patients received immunotherapy administered in the initiation phase according to a cluster schedule of eight doses injected on four visits. After 3 months of treatment, significant differences were found between the two groups in medication consumption (antihistamines in drops and oral formulations: p = 0.045 and p = 0.001, respectively; short-acting beta2-agonist treatments: p = 0.004) and respiratory symptoms (wheezing and coughing: p = 0.035 and 0.014, respectively). The cytokine profile (interleukin [IL]-4, 5, 10 and 2, interferon [IFN-gamma], and tumor necrosis factor [TNF-alpha]) was determined before the start of treatment and at the end of follow-up (4-5 months). Levels of IL-4, 5 and 10 (Th2 profile) decreased while those of IL-2, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha (Th1 profile) decreased. These differences were more marked in the active group than in the control group but were not statistically significant. No severe adverse effects were recorded. This study shows that the schedule tested had an acceptable tolerance profile and produced significant changes in symptom and medication scores after a few months of treatment. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study is needed to confirm these results.

Tolerance and short-term effect of a cluster schedule with pollen-extracts quantified in mass-units

We performed a prospective, multicenter study to assess the tolerance and possible short-term effects of allergen vaccines administered according to a cluster schedule in the months immediately preceding the onset of the pollen season. The study was carried out in eight centers and included 191 patients (children and adults) with allergic respiratory disease due to sensitization to olive tree and/or grass pollen. Of these, 34 patients acted as controls and the remaining patients received immunotherapy administered in the initiation phase according to a cluster schedule of eight doses injected on four visits. After 3 months of treatment, significant differences were found between the two groups in medication consumption (antihistamines in drops and oral formulations: p = 0.045 and p = 0.001, respectively; short-acting β2-agonist treatments: p = 0.004) and respiratory symptoms (wheezing and coughing: p = 0.035 and 0.014, respectively). The cytokine profile (interleukin [IL]-4, 5, 10 and 2, interferon [IFN-γ], and tumor necrosis factor [TNF-α]) was determined before the start of treatment and at the end of follow-up (4-5 months). Levels of IL-4, 5 and 10 (Th2 profile) decreased while those of IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α (Th1 profile) decreased. These differences were more marked in the active group than in the control group but were not statistically significant. No severe adverse effects were recorded. This study shows that the schedule tested had an acceptable tolerance profile and produced significant changes in symptom and medication scores after a few months of treatment. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study is needed to confirm these results (AU)

Se ha llevado a cabo un estudio prospectivo y multicéntrico con el objetivo de valorar la tolerancia y posible efecto a corto plazo de las vacunas alergénicas administradas bajo pauta cluster en los meses inmediatamente anteriores al inicio de la estación polínica. El estudio se realizó en 8 centros, incluyéndose un total de 191 pacientes (niños y adultos) con enfermedad alérgica respiratoria por sensibilización a polen de olivo y/o gramíneas. De ellos, 34 actuaron como controles y a los pacientes restantes se les administró inmunoterapia bajo una pauta cluster, en la fase de iniciación, de 8 dosis administradas en 4 visitas. Tras 3 meses de tratamiento, se registraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en el consumo de medicación (antihistamínicos en colirio y orales -p = 0,045 y p = 0,001 respectivamente- y ß2 de corta duración -p = 0,004-) así como en síntomas pulmonares (sibilancias y tos -p = 0,035 y 0,014 respectivamente-). Por otro lado, se determinó el perfil de citocinas (IL-4, 5, 10 y 2, IFN-gamma y TNF-a) de forma previa al inicio del tratamiento y al finalizar el seguimiento (4-5 meses). Se observaron descensos en los niveles de IL-4, 5 y 10 (perfil TH2) y aumento en los valores de IL-2, IFN-gamma y TNF-a (perfil TH1), más marcados en el grupo activo que en el control, sin alcanzar significación estadística. No se registraron efectos adversos severos. Por tanto, podemos observar que la pauta ensayada mostró un adecuado perfil de tolerancia, y tras pocos meses de tratamiento se registraron cambios significativos en la puntuación de síntomas y medicación, siendo necesaria la realización de un estudio con un diseño doble ciego frente a placebo para confirmar los resultados obtenidos (AU)

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy with grass-pollen extract Alutard SQ during a 3-year period with initial rush immunotherapy.

Thirty patients with asthma and/or monosensitized allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen whose ages ranged from 15 to 35 years were selected. Two groups were established at random: an active group and a placebo group, and a double-blind study was done on treatment with immunotherapy for a period of 3 continuous years, with initiation doses administered according to the rush immunotherapy technique. Grass-pollen allergen extract Alutard SQ and histamine as a placebo were used. The objective parameters of efficacy evaluated were end-point cutaneous tests, conjunctival provocation, bronchial provocation, and symptom/medication scores, as well as specific immunoglobulin determinations. The statistical evaluation of the results was significant for the differences existing between the initial and final time of the active group, and there were significant differences between the two groups for all of the parameters considered. We found no relationship between clinical improvement and the range of specific immunoglobulin E values. Regarding the safety of the treatment, systemic adverse effects were manifested only in the initial phase (rush immunotherapy), and were easily controlled by treatment. We conclude that the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with grass pollen make it possible to consider this treatment fundamental in these patients.