Racial Disparities in Prostate Specific Antigen Screening and Referral to Urology in a Large, Integrated Health Care System: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Contemporary trends and racial disparities in prostate cancer screening and referral to urology for prostate cancer risk are not well characterized, despite consensus that Black men are at higher risk for poor prostate cancer outcomes. The objective of this study was to characterize current racial disparities in prostate cancer screening and referral from primary care to urology for prostate cancer concern within our large, integrated health care system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from Atrium Health's enterprise data warehouse, which includes patient information from more than 900 care locations across North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. We included all men seen in the ambulatory or outpatient setting between 2014 and 2019 who were ≥40 years old. Clinical and demographic data were collected for all men, including age and race. Racial outcomes were reported for all groups with >2% representation in the population. Between-group comparisons were determined using chi-squared analysis, Wilcoxon rank sum testing and multivariable logistic regression, with significance defined as p <0.05. RESULTS: We observed a significant decrease in prostate specific antigen testing across all age and racial groups in a cohort of 606,985 men at Atrium Health, including 87,189 Black men, with an overall relative decline of 56%. As compared to White men, Black men were more likely to undergo prostate specific antigen testing (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.22-1.26) and be referred to urology for prostate cancer (adjusted OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.75-2.16). CONCLUSIONS: There was a continued significant decline in prostate cancer screening between 2014 and 2019. Despite having modestly elevated odds of being screened for prostate cancer compared to White men, Black men are relatively underscreened when considering that those who undergo prostate specific antigen screening are more likely to be referred by primary care to urology for additional prostate cancer diagnostic evaluation.

Association of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor Use with Prostate Specific Antigen Level at the Time of Urology Referral in a Retrospective Cohort at a Large, Integrated Health Care System.

INTRODUCTION: 5-Alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) use leads to a 50% decline in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) without a concomitant decrease in prostate cancer (PCa) risk. We hypothesize that failure to account for the effect of 5-ARI use on serum PSA leads to increased PCa risk at urology referral among 5-ARI users. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study for the years 2018-2019. Atrium Health is a large, vertically integrated health system with over 900 care locations in North Carolina and South Carolina. Men ≥40 years old during 2018-2019 who had a PSA test performed were included. We determined differences in corrected serum PSA level at the time of referral to urology. 5-ARI users and nonusers were compared using the chi-square test, Student's t-test and gamma regression. RESULTS: From 2018-2019, there were 91,368 men who underwent PSA testing, including 2,939 5-ARI users. At referral, 5-ARI users had similar uncorrected median PSA (5.8 vs 5.6 ng/ml, p=0.05). After correcting for the effect of 5-ARIs on PSA, 5-ARI users had a median PSA of 11.6 ng/ml at urology referral, compared to 5.6 ng/ml in nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: Men taking 5-ARIs have higher corrected serum PSA at time of referral to urology. As the unadjusted PSA at referral to urology for PCa risk was similar between 5-ARI users and nonusers, this indicates that the effect of 5-ARI use on serum PSA levels is not routinely accounted for when assessing PCa risk.

Perioperative Oral Nutrition Supplementation Reduces Prevalence of Sarcopenia following Radical Cystectomy: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: We designed a prospective randomized, controlled pilot trial to investigate the effects of an enriched oral nutrition supplement on body composition and clinical outcomes following radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 61 patients were randomized to an oral nutrition supplement or a multivitamin multimineral supplement twice daily during an 8-week perioperative period. Body composition was determined by analyzing abdominal computerized tomography images at the L3 vertebra. Sarcopenia was defined as a skeletal muscle index of less than 55 cm/m in males and less than 39 cm/m in females. The primary outcome was the difference in 30-day hospital free days. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, complications, readmissions and mortality. RESULTS: The oral nutrition supplement group lost less weight (-5 vs -6.5 kg, p = 0.04) compared to the multivitamin multimineral supplement group. The proportion of patients with sarcopenia did not change in the oral nutrition supplement group but increased 20% in the multivitamin multimineral supplement group (p = 0.01). Mean length of stay and 30-day hospital free days were similar in the groups. The oral nutrition supplement group had a lower rate of overall and major (Clavien grade 3 or greater) complications (48% vs 67% and 19% vs 25%, respectively) and a lower readmission rate (7% vs 17%) but the differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo radical cystectomy after consuming an oral nutrition supplement perioperatively have a reduced prevalence of sarcopenia and may also experience fewer and less severe complications and readmissions. A larger blinded, randomized, controlled trial is necessary to determine whether oral nutrition supplement interventions can improve outcomes following radical cystectomy.

Oncologic efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: A single institution's experience with CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) was studied to determine the disease-free survival and complication rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 125 RCCs in 104 patients treated with curative intent was reviewed. Radiofrequency ablation treatments were performed using conscious sedation and local anesthesia. Patients were followed with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Tumor control was defined as the absence of contrast enhancement in the tumor on CT or MRI. RESULTS: Tumor size ranged from 0.6 to 8.8 cm (mean, 2.7 cm; SD, 1.5 cm). Of the 125 treated tumors, 116 (93%) were completely ablated (109 in a single ablation session, seven after a second ablation session) with a mean follow-up interval of 13.8 months. All 95 RCCs smaller than 3.7 cm were completely ablated, and 21 (70%) of 30 larger tumors were completely ablated, with nine showing evidence of residual viable tumor on follow-up scans. Tumor size smaller than 3.7 cm was significantly associated with achieving complete tumor eradication (p < 0.001). With each 1-cm increase in tumor diameter over 3.6 cm, the likelihood of tumor-free survival decreased by a factor of 2.19 (p < 0.001). There were 8 (8%) complications, none of which resulted in long-term morbidity. CONCLUSION: CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is a safe method to treat small RCCs. This study indicates that radiofrequency ablation can reliably eradicate RCCs smaller than 3.7 cm. Treatment of larger RCCs will result in an increased risk of residual RCC.

Microwave ablation of renal parenchymal tumors before nephrectomy: phase I study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine, in renal neoplasms, the size of ablation zones induced in vivo with percutaneous microwave probes and whether skip areas remain within the ablation zones. CONCLUSION: For a single 10-minute ablation, ablated volumes averaged 27 cm3 and 105 cm3 with a single-probe and a three-probe ablation array, respectively. There were no skip areas within the ablated zone. Microwave ablation can safely and quickly generate large ablation lesions and renal neoplasms.

Phase I-II prospective dose-escalating trial of lycopene in patients with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer after definitive local therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To report a prospective trial of lycopene supplementation in biochemically relapsed prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 36 men with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer were enrolled in a dose-escalating, Phase I-II trial of lycopene supplementation. Six consecutive cohorts of 6 patients each received daily supplementation with 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 mg/day for 1 year. The serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and plasma levels of lycopene were measured at baseline and every 3 months. The primary endpoints were PSA response (defined as a 50% decrease in serum PSA from baseline), pharmacokinetics, and the toxicity/tolerability of this regimen. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled. The median age was 74 years (range 56 to 83), with a median serum PSA at entry of 4.4 ng/mL (range 0.8 to 24.9). No serum PSA responses were observed, and 37% of patients had PSA progression. The median time to progression was not reached. Toxicity was mild, with 1 patient discontinuing therapy because of diarrhea. Significant elevations of plasma lycopene were noted at 3 months and then appeared to plateau for all six dose levels. The plasma levels for doses between 15 and 90 mg/day were similar, with additional elevation only at 120 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Lycopene supplementation in men with biochemically relapsed prostate cancer is safe and well tolerated. The plasma levels of lycopene were similar for a wide dose range (15 to 90 mg/day) and plateaued by 3 months. Lycopene supplementation at the doses used in this study did not result in any discernible response in serum PSA.

Complementary and alternative medicine for advanced prostate cancer.

Complimentary and alternative medicines (CAM) have increased drastically in popularity in the past decade. These are largely in the form of nutritional supplements. Despite a wealth of information sources on the subject, the fundamental problem with CAM therapies is a dearth of evidence-based medicine. Advanced prostate cancer has significant long-term morbidity, and there is a growing interest in alternative and complimentary forms of therapy that will improve the outcomes of patients who have recurrent or advanced prostate cancer while obviating the need for more toxic forms of therapy. In this article we summarize the use of some of the more common CAM nutritional supplements and review the scientific data that are available to support their use.