Use of custom-moulded earmoulds to improve repeatability of DPOAE map measurements.

OBJECTIVE: Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) mapping characterises cochlear function, can include both the 2f1-2f2 and 2f2-2f1 DPOAEs, and shows promise for tracking cochlear changes. DPOAE amplitude measurements are not as repeatable longitudinally as pure-tone audiometry, likely due in part to probe placement sensitivity. We hypothesised that DPOAE level map variation over multiple testing sessions could be minimised by replacing traditional rubber tips with custom-moulded probe tips. DESIGN: Traditional rubber tips (TRT) and custom-moulded probes tips (CMPT) were used to measure DPOAE level maps repeatedly over five sessions. Probe placement was assessed using a frequency sweep in the ear canal. Repeatability of the DPOAE level maps was assessed using a Bland-Altman analysis. Overall map repeatability was assessed by measuring differences in distortion product amplitude over sessions. STUDY SAMPLE: Crossover study with a convenience sample size of six adults. RESULTS: The CMPT frequency sweeps showed reduced variability in probe placement. The repeatability coefficient for individual DPOAEs measurements improved from 6.9 dB SPL with the TRT to 5.1 dB SPL with the CMPT. Map repeatability improved for most subjects with the CMPT.

Going wireless and booth-less for hearing testing in industry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the test-retest variability of hearing thresholds obtained with an innovative, mobile wireless automated hearing-test system (WAHTS) with enhanced sound attenuation to test industrial workers at a worksite as compared to standardised automated hearing thresholds obtained in a mobile trailer sound booth. DESIGN: A within-subject repeated-measures design was used to compare air-conducted threshold tests (500-8000 Hz) measured with the WAHTS in six workplace locations, and a third test using computer-controlled audiometry obtained in a mobile trailer sound booth. Ambient noise levels were measured in all test environments. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty workers served as listeners and 20 workers served as operators. RESULTS: On average, the WAHTS resulted in equivalent thresholds as the mobile trailer audiometry at 1000, 2000, 3000 and 8000 Hz and thresholds were within ±5 dB at 500, 4000 and 6000 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable performance may be obtained with the WAHTS in occupational audiometry and valid thresholds may be obtained in diverse test locations without the use of sound-attenuating enclosures.

Pure-tone audiometric threshold assessment with in-ear monitoring of noise levels.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to obtain reliable threshold measurements without a sound booth by using a passive noise-attenuating hearing protector combined with in-ear 1/3-octave band noise measurements to verify the ear canal was suitably quiet. DESIGN: We deployed laptop-based hearing testing systems to Tanzania as part of a study of HIV infection and hearing. An in-ear probe containing a microphone was used under the hearing protector for both the in-ear noise measurements and threshold audiometry. The 1/3-octave band noise spectrum from the microphone was displayed on the operator's screen with acceptable levels in grey and unacceptable levels in red. Operators attempted to make all bars grey, but focused on achieving grey bars at 2000 Hz and above. STUDY SAMPLE: 624 adults and 197 children provided 3381 in-ear octave band measurements. Repeated measurements from 144 individuals who returned for testing on three separate occasions were also analysed. RESULTS: In-ear noise levels exceeded the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANL) for ears not covered, but not the dB SPL levels corresponding to 0 dB HL between 2000-4000 Hz. In-ear noise measurements were repeatable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable audiometry can be performed using a passive noise-attenuating hearing protector and in-ear noise measurements.