Alkaline Water: Help or Hype for Uric Acid and Cystine Urolithiasis?

PURPOSE: The consumption of alkaline water, water with an average pH of 8 to 10, has been steadily increasing globally as proponents claim it to be a healthier alternative to regular water. Urinary alkalinization therapy is frequently prescribed in patients with uric acid and cystine urolithiasis, and as such we analyzed commercially available alkaline waters to assess their potential to increase urinary pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five commercially available alkaline water brands (Essentia, Smart Water Alkaline, Great Value Hydrate Alkaline Water, Body Armor SportWater, and Perfect Hydration) underwent anion chromatography and direct chemical measurements to determine the mineral contents of each product. The alkaline content of each bottle of water was then compared to that of potassium citrate (the gold standard for urinary alkalinization) as well as to other beverages and supplements used to augment urinary citrate and/or the urine pH. RESULTS: The pH levels of the bottled alkaline water ranged from 9.69 to 10.15. Electrolyte content was minimal, and the physiologic alkali content was below 1 mEq/L for all brands of alkaline water. The alkali content of alkaline water is minimal when compared to common stone treatment alternatives such as potassium citrate. In addition, several organic beverages, synthetic beverages, and other supplements contain more alkali content than alkaline water, and can achieve the AUA and European Association of Urology alkali recommendation of 30 to 60 mEq per day with ≤ 3 servings/d. CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available alkaline water has negligible alkali content and thus provides no added benefit over tap water for patients with uric acid and cystine urolithiasis.

A Review of the Recommendations and Strength of Evidence for Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Small Renal Masses.

Introduction: With the rise in the detection of incidental small renal masses (SRM), the management paradigm for these patients has become an issue of increasing concern. We aim to identify areas of consensus, controversy, and opportunities for improvement among recently published guidelines and assess the strength of evidence for the management of SRMs. Methods: We reviewed practice guidelines for SRMs promulgated by the American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. Levels of evidence and strength of recommendations for evaluation, management and follow-up were analyzed with regard to consensus, conflict, and neglect. Results: There is consensus among guidelines for the initial evaluation and treatment of SRMs; however, discrepancies exist with regard to indications for active surveillance, thermal ablation, and timing/method of follow-up after treatment. Routine renal mass biopsy is not recommended by any guideline. Overwhelmingly, guideline statements are based on low to moderate levels of evidence; only 23% of the reviewed guidelines were based on high-level evidence, 38% based on moderate-level, and 39% on low-level evidence or expert opinion. Conclusions: Despite all six guidelines sharing a consensus on most management topics regarding SRMs, the ongoing lack of high-level evidence precludes gold standard recommendations in the areas of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. More high-quality studies are needed to develop a stronger, data-supported universal guideline for the management of SRMs.

Third Prize: Comparison of radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic microwave thermotherapy, cryotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation for destruction of experimental VX-2 renal tumors in rabbits.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Currently available minimally invasive renal tumor-ablation procedures include cryotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave thermotherapy. In this study, we investigated the ability of these three approaches to destroy experimental renal tumors in rabbits. The mechanism of potential tumor metastasis was also explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VX-2 tumor line is an aggressive rabbit epidermoid tumor with a high metastatic potential. An initial experiment comparing cooled-tip microwave thermotherapy with cryotherapy and radical nephrectomy for treatment of small VX-2 tumors revealed that all microwave-treated rabbits had local recurrence and that several also had diffuse intraperitoneal carcinomatosis. In view of these results, a second experiment was performed in which 45 New Zealand White rabbits were implanted laparoscopically with VX-2 xenografts underneath the kidney capsule and divided into five groups of 9 each. The test groups were microwave thermotherapy with a 3.5-mm cooled-tip probe, microwave thermotherapy with a 3.5-mm noncooled- tip probe, radiofrequency ablation with a 1.5-mm cooled-tip probe, radiofrequency ablation with a 1.5- mm non-cooled tip probe, and cryotherapy with a 2.3-mm cryoprobe. The control groups were five rabbits that were not treated, five rabbits with tumors that had the tumor pierced with a probe but were untreated, and five rabbits that underwent nephrectomy after piercing of the tumor. Treatment was initiated 5 days after tumor implantation. One month later, all animals were euthanized and autopsied. RESULTS: At 5 days after tumor implantation, laparoscopic inspection revealed no visible peritoneal metastases. At 1 month, in the cooled and non-cooled microwave-thermotherapy groups, carcinomatosis occurred in five and six of nine animals, respectively. In comparison, carcinomatosis was detected in two of nine animals in the cryotherapy group at autopsy. With respect to cooled and non-cooled radiofrequency ablation, carcinomatosis was observed in four of nine rabbits in each group. In the control groups, none of the animals with unpierced tumors exhibited carcinomatosis, while carcinomatosis was seen in two of the five rabbits with tumor violated by piercing and in three of the five rabbits that underwent immediate nephrectomy after piercing of the tumor. CONCLUSION: Carcinomatosis occurred most frequently in animals treated with microwave thermotherapy, followed by radiofrequency ablation, and lastly cryoablation. The simple act of piercing a highly aggressive tumor can result in local spread. More disconcerting, and less well understood, is why certain ablative modalities appear to increase the rate of intraperitoneal spread.

Needle-based ablation of renal parenchyma using microwave, cryoablation, impedance- and temperature-based monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency, and liquid and gel chemoablation: laboratory studies and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Small renal tumors are often serendipitously detected during the screening of patients for renal or other disease entities. Rather than perform a radical or partial nephrectomy for these diminutive lesions, several centers have begun to explore a variety of ablative energy sources that could be applied directly via a percutaneously placed needle-like probe. To evaluate the utility of such treatment for small renal tumors/masses, we compared the feasibility, regularity (consistency in size and shape), and reproducibility of necrosis produced in normal porcine kidneys by different modes of tissue ablation: microwaves, cold impedance-based and temperature-based radiofrequency (RF) energy (monopolar and bipolar), and chemical. Chemoablation was accomplished using ethanol gel, hypertonic saline gel, and acetic acid gel either alone or with simultaneous application of monopolar or bipolar RF energy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 renal lesions were created laparoscopically in 33 domestic pigs. Microwave thermoablation (N=12) was done using a Targis T3 (Urologix) 10F antenna. Cryoablation (N=16) was done using a single 1.5-mm probe or three 17F microprobes (17F SeedNet system; Galil Medical) (N=10 single probe and N=6 three probes); a double freeze cycle with a passive thaw was employed under ultrasound guidance. Dry RF lesions were created using custom-made 18-gauge single-needle monopolar probe with two or three exposed metal tips (GelTx) (N=12) or a single-needle bipolar probe (N=6) at 50 W of 510 kHz RF energy for 5 minutes. In addition, a multitine RF probe (RITA Medical Systems) was used in one set of studies (N=6). Both impedance- and temperature-based RF were evaluated. Chemoablation was performed with 95% ethanol (4 mL), 24% hypertonic saline (4 mL), and 50% acetic acid (4 mL) as single injections. In addition, chemoablation was tested with monopolar and bipolar RF (wet RF). Tissues were harvested 1 week after ablation for light microscopy. RESULTS: In 11 of the 15 ablation techniques, there was complete necrosis in all lesions; however, three ethanol gel lesions had skip areas, three hypertonic saline gel lesions showed no necrosis or injury, and one monopolar RF and one bipolar RF lesion showed skip areas. In contrast to impedance-based RF, heat-based RF (RITA) caused complete necrosis without skip areas. All cryolesions resulted in complete tissue necrosis, and cryotherapy was the only modality for which lesion size could be effectively monitored using ultrasound imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoablation and thermotherapy produce well-delineated, completely necrotic renal lesions. The single-probe monopolar and bipolar RF produce limited areas of tissue necrosis; however, both are enhanced by using hypertonic saline, acetic acid, or ethanol gel. Hypertonic saline gel with RF consistently provided the largest lesions. Ethanol and hypertonic saline gels tested alone failed to produce consistent cellular necrosis at 1 week. In contrast, RITA using the Starburst XL probe produced consistent necrosis, while impedance-based RF left skip areas of viable tissue. Renal cryotherapy under ultrasound surveillance produced hypoechoic lesions, which could be reasonably monitored, while all other modalities yielded hyperechoic lesions the margins of which could not be properly monitored with ultrasound imaging.

Ferromagnetic self-regulating reheatable thermal rod implants for in situ tissue ablation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ferromagnetic compounds, when placed in a radiofrequency magnetic field, develop an electrical current. When placed in tissue, resistance to the transmission of the electrical current leads to heating of the tissues next to the ferromagnetic compound. The Curie temperature is a transition point at which the development of a particular temperature within the material results in loss of its magnetic properties; as such, when this temperature is reached, there is cessation of current, and thus heat production stops. Our goal was to examine the ablative impact of permanently implanted palladium and cobalt self-regulating temperature rods on solid abdominal and pelvic organs. These rods were designed to develop a maximum temperature of 70 degrees C. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 16 pigs, renal, hepatic, uterine, and pancreatic ferromagnetic rods were placed using a template. The rods were delivered in 1-cm parallel rows of two rods each in order to ablate 7 g of tissue. The animals were subsequently treated in an extracorporeal magnetic field of 50 gauss rms at a frequency of 50 kHz. The position of the rods was confirmed by fluoroscopy before the animal was put in the magnetic field. The animals received one or two treatment sessions. Intralesional and extralesional temperatures were measured continuously. Serum chemistry was analyzed before surgery, after each treatment, and at the time of harvest. Two weeks following therapy, the treated tissues were harvested and examined histopathologically. RESULTS: In all tissues with properly aligned rods, the temperature of the tissue surrounding the rods exceeded 50 degrees C. Histologic review showed confluent tissue necrosis in 7 of 9 kidneys (78%), 6 of 9 livers (67%), 1 of 3 pancreases (33%), and 1 of 3 uterine specimens (33%). Necrosis extended for 2 mm beyond the periphery of the rods. All failures were secondary to technical misalignment of the rods, which occurred because of our attempt to treat more than one organ in each animal. CONCLUSIONS: Ferromagnetic rods, when properly aligned in a magnetic field, create well-defined areas of necrosis. There are no skip areas of viable tissue within the treated area, and there is a precipitous fall-off of injury just outside the area of treatment. Also, because the rods can be reactivated at any time, recurrent lesions within the same site can be treated. This form of minimally invasive in situ ablative therapy appears promising. Clinical trials in the kidney and in other abdominal and pelvic organs are pending.