RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Overgeneralised self-blame and worthlessness are key symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) and have previously been associated with self-blame-selective changes in connectivity between right superior anterior temporal lobe (rSATL) and subgenual frontal cortices. Another study showed that remitted MDD patients were able to modulate this neural signature using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) neurofeedback training, thereby increasing their self-esteem. The feasibility and potential of using this approach in symptomatic MDD were unknown. METHOD: This single-blind pre-registered randomised controlled pilot trial probed a novel self-guided psychological intervention with and without additional rSATL-posterior subgenual cortex (BA25) fMRI neurofeedback, targeting self-blaming emotions in people with insufficiently recovered MDD and early treatment-resistance (n = 43, n = 35 completers). Participants completed three weekly self-guided sessions to rebalance self-blaming biases. RESULTS: As predicted, neurofeedback led to a training-induced reduction in rSATL-BA25 connectivity for self-blame v. other-blame. Both interventions were safe and resulted in a 46% reduction on the Beck Depression Inventory-II, our primary outcome, with no group differences. Secondary analyses, however, revealed that patients without DSM-5-defined anxious distress showed a superior response to neurofeedback compared with the psychological intervention, and the opposite pattern in anxious MDD. As predicted, symptom remission was associated with increases in self-esteem and this correlated with the frequency with which participants employed the psychological strategies in daily life. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that self-blame-rebalance neurofeedback may be superior over a solely psychological intervention in non-anxious MDD, although further confirmatory studies are needed. Simple self-guided strategies tackling self-blame were beneficial, but need to be compared against treatment-as-usual in further trials. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10526888.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Neurorretroalimentación , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/patología , Proyectos Piloto , Neurorretroalimentación/métodos , Depresión , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) affects between 0.006% and 3% of the population depending on the criteria of definition used, with women being at higher risk than men. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to March 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 46 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antidepressants, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), corticosteroids, dietary supplements, evening primrose oil, galantamine, graded exercise therapy, homeopathy, immunotherapy, intramuscular magnesium, oral nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, and prolonged rest.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica , Homeopatía , Terapia por Ejercicio , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/psicología , Humanos , Descanso , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response is sensitive to sex, with healthy young women showing less PPI compared with age-matched men, and varies according to the menstrual cycle phase in women. Relatively less is known regarding sex and hormonal influences in prepulse facilitation (PPF). Menstrual phase-related variability in PPI is suggested to be mediated by fluctuating estrogen level, based on the observations of more PPI in women during the follicular, relative to the luteal, phase. No study has directly assessed the relationship between fluctuating hormones and PPI or PPF levels over the human ovarian cycle. To examine the roles of circulating ovarian hormones in PPI and PPF, 16 non-smoking regularly menstruating healthy women were tested during both the follicular and luteal phases on PPI and PPF and provided saliva samples for measurement of 17beta-estradiol (estrogen), progesterone and testosterone. The results showed higher levels of 17beta-estradiol and progesterone during the luteal, relative to the follicular, phase; and more PPI during the follicular phase and more PPF during the luteal phase with comparable startle amplitude and habituation during the two phases. A larger increase in progesterone was associated with a smaller decrease in PPI from the follicular to the luteal phase. No significant associations were found between changes in PPI/PPF and estrogen levels. The findings confirm lower PPI during the luteal, compared with the follicular, phase and suggest a role for progesterone, more specifically an antipsychotic-like PPI-restoration action of progesterone, during the luteal phase in PPI of young women.
Asunto(s)
Habituación Psicofisiológica/fisiología , Inhibición Psicológica , Ciclo Menstrual/fisiología , Progesterona/metabolismo , Reflejo de Sobresalto/fisiología , Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Electromiografía/métodos , Femenino , Hormonas Esteroides Gonadales/metabolismo , Humanos , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología , Estadística como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response is sensitive to sex with women showing less PPI compared with age-matched men and varies according to the menstrual cycle in women. Relatively less is known about sex differences in prepulse facilitation (PPF). To examine further the roles of sex and circulating sex hormones, pre- (n=20) and postmenopausal women (n=20) were compared with men of similar ages (n=17, 18-40 years; n=18, 55-69 years). All participants were assessed on PPI and PPF, and provided saliva samples for measurement of 17beta-estradiol (estrogen) and testosterone. Premenopausal women showed less PPI compared with age-matched men, with no significant difference in PPF. Postmenopausal women did not differ in PPI but showed more PPF than age-matched men. There was less PPI and PPF in older, relative to young, men; pre- and postmenopausal women did not differ significantly. PPI showed no association with the levels of sex hormones. PPF showed small positive associations with both the levels of estrogen and testosterone, especially in young men. The present findings extend recent observations in mice showing less PPI in premenopausal, but not postmenopausal, female compared with male mice of similar ages (Ison and Allen, Behav Brain Res, 2007) to humans. There appear to be no substantial relationships between individual differences in endogenous levels of sex hormones and PPI; fluctuations within an individual may have a stronger role.
Asunto(s)
Inhibición Neural/fisiología , Posmenopausia/fisiología , Premenopausia/fisiología , Reflejo de Sobresalto/fisiología , Caracteres Sexuales , Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Estradiol/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología , Testosterona/análisisRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) affects between 0.006% and 3% of the population depending on the criteria of definition used, with women being at higher risk than men. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to September 2007 (BMJ Clinical evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 45 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antidepressants, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), corticosteroids, dietary supplements, evening primrose oil, galantamine, graded exercise therapy, homeopathy, immunotherapy, intramuscular magnesium, oral nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, and prolonged rest.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica , Homeopatía , Terapia por Ejercicio , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Prevalencia , Descanso , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Impairments in the neural circuitry of verbal working memory are evident in depression. Factors of task demand and depressive state might have significant effects on its functional neuroanatomy. METHODS: Two groups underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a verbal working memory task of varying cognitive load (n-back). The patient group comprised 20 medication-free individuals in an acute episode of unipolar major depression and the control group comprised 20 healthy individuals. Scans were acquired at weeks 0 (baseline), 2, and 8. Patients received treatment with fluoxetine after the baseline scan. Cerebral activations were measured for mean overall activation as well as the linear and quadratic load-response activity with increasing task demand (1-, 2-, 3-back). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in performance accuracy between groups. However, a main effect of group was observed in the load-response activity in frontal and posterior cortical regions within the verbal working memory network in which patients showed a greater load-response relative to control subjects. Group by time effects were revealed in the load-response activity in the caudate and thalamus. As a marker of treatment response, a lower linear load-response at baseline in the dorsal anterior cingulate, left middle frontal, and lateral temporal cortices was associated with an improved clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance of performance accuracy in patients was accompanied by a significant increase in the load-response activity in frontal and posterior cortical regions within the verbal working memory network. These data also provide further support for resilience of activity in the anterior cingulate as a predictor of treatment response in depression.