RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive primary central nervous system cancer in adults characterised by uniformly poor survival. Despite maximal safe resection and postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy, tumours inevitably recur. Imaging with O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to impact adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) planning, distinguish between treatment-induced pseudoprogression versus tumour progression as well as prognostication. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The FET-PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) study is a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, phase II study across 10 Australian sites and will enrol up to 210 adults aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. FET-PET will be performed at up to three time points: (1) following initial surgery and prior to commencement of chemoradiation (FET-PET1); (2) 4 weeks following concurrent chemoradiation (FET-PET2); and (3) within 14 days of suspected clinical and/or radiological progression on MRI (performed at the time of clinical suspicion of tumour recurrence) (FET-PET3). The co-primary outcomes are: (1) to investigate how FET-PET versus standard MRI impacts RT volume delineation and (2) to determine the accuracy and management impact of FET-PET in distinguishing pseudoprogression from true tumour progression. The secondary outcomes are: (1) to investigate the relationships between FET-PET parameters (including dynamic uptake, tumour to background ratio, metabolic tumour volume) and progression-free survival and overall survival; (2) to assess the change in blood and tissue biomarkers determined by serum assay when comparing FET-PET data acquired prior to chemoradiation with other prognostic markers, looking at the relationships of FET-PET versus MRI-determined site/s of progressive disease post chemotherapy treatment with MRI and FET-PET imaging; and (3) to estimate the health economic impact of incorporating FET-PET into glioblastoma management and in the assessment of post-treatment pseudoprogression or recurrence/true progression. Exploratory outcomes include the correlation of multimodal imaging, blood and tumour biomarker analyses with patterns of failure and survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol V.2.0 dated 20 November 2020 has been approved by a lead Human Research Ethics Committee (Austin Health, Victoria). Other clinical sites will provide oversight through local governance processes, including obtaining informed consent from suitable participants. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results of the FIG study (TROG 18.06) will be disseminated via relevant scientific and consumer forums and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR ACTRN12619001735145.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Ficus , Glioblastoma , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioblastoma/terapia , Glioblastoma/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tirosina , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Australia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) transcriptional program is characterized by repression of E-cadherin (CDH1) and induction of N-cadherin (CDH2), and mesenchymal genes like vimentin (VIM). Placenta-specific 8 (PLAC8) has been implicated in colon cancer; however, how PLAC8 contributes to disease is unknown, and endogenous PLAC8 protein has not been studied. We analyzed zebrafish and human tissues and found that endogenous PLAC8 localizes to the apical domain of differentiated intestinal epithelium. Colon cancer cells with elevated PLAC8 levels exhibited EMT features, including increased expression of VIM and zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1), aberrant cell motility, and increased invasiveness. In contrast to classical EMT, PLAC8 overexpression reduced cell surface CDH1 and upregulated P-cadherin (CDH3) without affecting CDH2 expression. PLAC8-induced EMT was linked to increased phosphorylated ERK2 (p-ERK2), and ERK2 knockdown restored cell surface CDH1 and suppressed CDH3, VIM, and ZEB1 upregulation. In vitro, PLAC8 directly bound and inactivated the ERK2 phosphatase DUSP6, thereby increasing p-ERK2. In a murine xenograft model, knockdown of endogenous PLAC8 in colon cancer cells resulted in smaller tumors, reduced local invasion, and decreased p-ERK2. Using MultiOmyx, a multiplex immunofluorescence-based methodology, we observed coexpression of cytosolic PLAC8, CDH3, and VIM at the leading edge of a human colorectal tumor, supporting a role for PLAC8 in cancer invasion in vivo.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/metabolismo , Transición Epitelial-Mesenquimal , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Proteína Quinasa 1 Activada por Mitógenos/metabolismo , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Proteínas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Pez Cebra/metabolismo , Pez Cebra/metabolismo , Animales , Antígenos CD , Cadherinas/biosíntesis , Cadherinas/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias del Colon/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Fosfatasa 6 de Especificidad Dual , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Ratones , Proteína Quinasa 1 Activada por Mitógenos/genética , Invasividad Neoplásica , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas/genética , Vimentina/biosíntesis , Vimentina/genética , Pez Cebra/genética , Proteínas de Pez Cebra/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred for imaging the central nervous system (CNS). An important hazard for neurostimulation patients is heating at the electrode interface induced, for example, by 64-MHz radiofrequency (RF) magnetic fields of a 1.5T scanner. OBJECTIVE: We performed studies to define the thermal dose (time and temperature) that would not cause symptomatic neurological injury. METHODS: Approaches included animal studies where leads with temperature probes were implanted in the brain or spine of sheep and exposed to RF-induced temperatures of 37 °C to 49 °C for 30 minutes. Histopathological examinations were performed 7 days after recovery. We also reviewed the threshold for RF lesions in the CNS, and for CNS injury from cancer hyperthermia. Cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C was used to normalize the data to exposure times and temperatures expected during MRI. RESULTS: Deep brain and spinal RF heating up to 43 °C for 30 minutes produced indistinguishable effects compared with 37 °C controls. Exposures greater than 43 °C for 30 minutes produced temperature-dependent, localized thermal damage. These results are consistent with limits on hyperthermia exposure to 41.8 °C for 60 minutes in patients who have cancer and with the reversibility of low-temperature and short-duration trial heating during RF lesion procedures. CONCLUSION: A safe temperature for induced lead heating is 43 °C for 30 minutes. MRI-related RF heating above 43 °C or longer than 30 minutes may be associated with increased risk of clinically evident thermal damage to neural structures immediately surrounding implanted leads. The establishment of a thermal dose limit is a first step toward making specific neurostimulation systems conditionally safe during MRI procedures.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/instrumentación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/instrumentación , Médula Espinal , Animales , Encéfalo/patología , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Fiebre/patología , Calor , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida , Neuroestimuladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Ovinos , Médula Espinal/patología , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/efectos adversos , Raíces Nerviosas Espinales/patología , Temperatura , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We report a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus for localization-related epilepsy. METHODS: Participants were adults with medically refractory partial seizures, including secondarily generalized seizures. Half received stimulation and half no stimulation during a 3-month blinded phase; then all received unblinded stimulation. RESULTS: One hundred ten participants were randomized. Baseline monthly median seizure frequency was 19.5. In the last month of the blinded phase the stimulated group had a 29% greater reduction in seizures compared with the control group, as estimated by a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model (p = 0.002). Unadjusted median declines at the end of the blinded phase were 14.5% in the control group and 40.4% in the stimulated group. Complex partial and "most severe" seizures were significantly reduced by stimulation. By 2 years, there was a 56% median percent reduction in seizure frequency; 54% of patients had a seizure reduction of at least 50%, and 14 patients were seizure-free for at least 6 months. Five deaths occurred and none were from implantation or stimulation. No participant had symptomatic hemorrhage or brain infection. Two participants had acute, transient stimulation-associated seizures. Cognition and mood showed no group differences, but participants in the stimulated group were more likely to report depression or memory problems as adverse events. DISCUSSION: Bilateral stimulation of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus reduces seizures. Benefit persisted for 2 years of study. Complication rates were modest. Deep brain stimulation of the anterior thalamus is useful for some people with medically refractory partial and secondarily generalized seizures.
Asunto(s)
Núcleos Talámicos Anteriores/fisiología , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Epilepsia/terapia , Adulto , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/efectos adversos , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Depresión/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Epilepsias Parciales/epidemiología , Epilepsias Parciales/prevención & control , Epilepsias Parciales/terapia , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Epilepsia/prevención & control , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Lateralidad Funcional/fisiología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Trastornos de la Memoria/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Memoria/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2006, the authors observed a cluster of three deaths, which circumstances suggested were opioid-related, within 1 day after placement of intrathecal opioid pumps for noncancer pain. Further investigation suggested that mortality among such patients was higher than previously appreciated. The authors performed investigations to quantify that mortality and compare the results to control populations, including spinal cord stimulation and low back surgery. METHODS: After analyzing nine index cases--three sentinel cases and six identified by a prospective strategy--the authors used epidemiological methods to investigate whether mortality rates reflected patient- or therapy-related differences. Mortality rates after intrathecal opioid therapy and spinal cord stimulation were derived by correlating Medtronic device registration data with de-identified data from the Social Security Death Master File. Aggregate demographic and comorbidity data were obtained from Medicare and United Healthcare population databases to examine the influence of demographics and comorbidities on mortality. RESULTS: Device registration and Social Security analyses revealed an intrathecal opioid therapy mortality rate of 0.088% at 3 days after implantation, 0.39% at 1 month, and 3.89% at 1 yr-a higher mortality than after spinal cord stimulation implants or after lumbar diskectomy in community hospitals. Demographic, illness profile, and mortality analyses of large databases suggest, despite limitations, that excess mortality was related to intrathecal opioid therapy, and could not be fully explained by other factors. These findings were consistent with the nine index cases that revealed that respiratory arrest caused or contributed to death in all patients. No device malfunctions associated with overinfusion were identified among cases where data were available. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with noncancer pain treated with intrathecal opioid therapy experience increased mortality compared to similar patients treated by using other therapies. Respiratory depression as a consequence of intrathecal drug overdosage or mixed intrathecal and systemic drug interactions is one plausible, but hypothetical mechanism. The exact causes for patient deaths and the proportion of those deaths attributable to intrathecal opioid therapy remain to be determined. These findings, although based on incomplete information, suggest that it may be possible to reduce mortality in noncancer intrathecal opioid therapy patients.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Implantes de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables/efectos adversos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/mortalidad , Médula Espinal , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Causas de Muerte , Bases de Datos Factuales , Discectomía , Sobredosis de Droga , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/mortalidad , Falla de Equipo , Paro Cardíaco/inducido químicamente , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/mortalidad , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECT: Neurostimulation to treat chronic pain includes approved and investigational therapies directed at the spinal cord, thalamus, periaqueductal or periventricular gray matter, motor cortex, and peripheral nerves. Persistent pain after surgery and work-related or neural injuries are common indications for such treatments. In light of the risks, efforts, costs, and expectations associated with neurostimulation therapies, a careful reexamination of the methods used to gather evidence for this treatment's long-term efficacy is in order. METHODS: The authors combed English-language publications to determine the nature of the evidence supporting the efficacy of neurostimulation therapies for chronic noncancer pain. To formulate recommendations for the design of future studies, the results of their analysis were compared with established guidelines for the evaluation of medical evidence. Evidence supporting the efficacy of neurostimulation has been collected predominantly from retrospective series or from prospective studies whose design or methods of analysis make them subject to limited interpretation. To date, there has been no successful clinical study focused on establishing the efficacy of neurostimulation for pain and incorporating sufficient numbers of participants, matched control groups, sham stimulation, randomization, prospectively defined end points, and methods for controlling experimental bias. Currently available data provide little support for the common practices of psychological or pharmacological screening or trial stimulation to predict and/or improve long-term results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not diminish the value of previous investigations or positive patient experiences and do not mean that the treatments are ineffective; rather, they reveal that new data are required to answer the questions raised in and by previous study data. Future analyses of emerging neurostimulation modalities for pain should, whenever feasible, require unambiguous diagnoses as an entry criterion and should involve the use of randomization, parallel control groups that receive sham stimulation, and blinding of patients, investigators, and device programmers. Given the chronicity of patient symptoms and stimulation therapies, efficacy should be studied for 1 year or longer after device implantation. Meticulous study methods are especially important to evaluate new therapies like motor cortex and occipital nerve stimulation.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Manejo del Dolor , Enfermedad Crónica , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Nervios Craneales/fisiopatología , Electrodos Implantados , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Corteza Motora/fisiopatología , Dolor/fisiopatología , Proyectos de Investigación , Médula Espinal/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Dolor Intratable/psicología , Dolor Intratable/cirugía , Efecto Placebo , Tálamo/cirugía , Analgesia/tendencias , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/tendencias , Humanos , Dolor Intratable/fisiopatología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tálamo/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Alpha-tocopheryl succinate (alpha-TOS), a redox-inactive analogue of vitamin E, is a strong inducer of apoptosis, whereas alpha-tocopherol (alpha-TOH) lacks apoptogenic activity (J. Neuzil et al., FASEB J., 15: 403-415, 2001). Here we investigated the possible antineoplastic activities of alpha-TOH and alpha-TOS and further explored the potential of alpha-TOS as an antitumor agent. Using nude mice with colon cancer xenografts, we found that alpha-TOH exerted modest antitumor activity and acted by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation. In contrast, alpha-TOS showed a more profound antitumor effect, at both the level of inhibition of proliferation and induction of tumor cell apoptosis. alpha-TOS was nontoxic to normal cells and tissues, triggered apoptosis in p53(-/-) and p21(Waf1/Cip1(-/-)) cancer cells, and exerted a cooperative proapoptotic activity with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (Apo2 ligand) due to differences in proapoptotic signaling. Finally, alpha-TOS cooperated with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in suppression of tumor growth in vivo. Vitamin E succinate is thus a potent and highly specific anticancer agent and/or adjuvant of considerable therapeutic potential.