Mothers' perspectives on the potential use of video-calling during early labour in the United Kingdom and Italy: A qualitative study.

PROBLEM: Women in early labour are typically encouraged to delay maternity unit admission, but they may find this challenging without appropriate professional support. BACKGROUND: Despite pre-pandemic research which identified potential advantages of video-calling in early labour, implementation of such service has not been reported. AIM: To explore mothers' perspectives on potential use of video-calls during early labour. METHODS: A multi-centre descriptive qualitative study was undertaken in UK and Italy. Ethical approval was gained and ethical processes were followed. Six virtual focus groups were conducted with 37 participants, 24 mothers who gave birth in the UK and 13 who gave birth in Italy. Line-by-line thematic analysis was performed and themes agreed. FINDINGS: Two themes emerged: 1) women's expectations of video-calls' content and features; 2) technological challenges and solutions. Mothers responded positively to the concept of video-calling in early labour. Receiving guidance, information on coping with pain and advice on timely access in early labour was perceived as key. Women highlighted the importance of accessible, reliable and user-friendly technology. Equitable access, technological literacy, acceptability and privacy were considered as challenges to implementation, with solutions proposed to overcome disparities. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Guidance and training should be provided to midwives, with designated resources to build a service that is accessible, acceptable, safe, individualised and respectful for mothers and birth companions. Further research should explore feasibility, acceptability, clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Intimate partner violence screening during pregnancy: midwives' perspective.

Violence during pregnancy has serious health consequences. Several scientific societies recommend introducing domestic violence screening in clinical practice, but it is poorly employed. This study aimed to explore midwives' perspective regarding how, where, and when to conduct intimate partner violence screening during pregnancy to increase its clinical application. We performed a qualitative study using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Eleven midwives were recruited, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was conducted. Six main themes emerged: "the healthcare providers involved," "the best place to investigate," "the best time to ask," "how to investigate," "what facilitates investigations and women's disclosure," and "what hinders investigations and women's disclosure." Most interviewees believed that midwives are the most suitable healthcare providers to investigate violent situations during pregnancy because the continuity of midwifery care can facilitate women's disclosure. Midwives emphasized the importance of an environment where women's privacy is respected. Midwives did not consider it appropriate to ask about domestic violence at the first antenatal appointment. Most believed that the best way to investigate domestic violence depends on the context and the woman's personal history.

The unpredictable nature of labour and birth: A qualitative investigation regarding expectations of Italian parents to-be.

OBJECTIVE: to explore first-time Italian parents' expectations of labour and birth. DESIGN: qualitative Husserlian phenomenological approach, using face-to-face focus groups for parents during the late third trimester of pregnancy. Data analysis, using Colaizzi's phenomenological method, included the processes of reading and re-reading the text to extract relevant statements in order to identify themes and finally member checking was performed to validate participants' expressions SETTING: consultant-led maternity unit in Northern Italy, with approximately 2500 births per annum. PARTICIPANTS: purposive sample of eight first-time parents-to-be, with a straightforward singleton pregnancy, who participated in two focus groups during pregnancy, one for women and one for their partners, to explore their expectations of birth. FINDINGS: uncertainties, doubts and fears were reported by all women. Although they expected to have a normal birth, they remained open-minded due to the awareness of the unpredictable nature of childbirth. One of the strongest emotions expressed by women was that of fear, especially of labour. They found different strategies to cope with those fears and to anticipate their potential disappointment and frustration regarding a childbirth experience that potentially could differ from their expectations. Women wanted their partner with them to share the birth experience and they valued their presence as essential. The midwife was expected to be a supportive guide. Fathers-to-be, although happy about the idea to be present at birth, were also concerned about their reaction to an unknown experience, about the woman's labour pain and were worried about not being helpful to her. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: to our knowledge this is the first such study to be conducted in Italy. In order to support families as a whole, the importance of the father in a supportive role and as an essential parent himself should be addressed, considering his wishes. Midwives should strive to provide family centre-care, to be supportive and sensitive. Antenatal education classes should be conducted with both parents in order to understand their expectations, give information about duration and stages of labour and birth, prepare for parenthood, addressing fears and enhancing a positive experience of birth.

Variables related to maternal satisfaction with intrapartum care in Northern Italy.

BACKGROUND: The experience of labour and birth is complex, multidimensional and subjective and has the potential to affect the women and their families physically and emotionally. However, there is a lack of research around maternal satisfaction in Italy. AIM: To evaluate mothers' satisfaction with their childbirth experience in relation to socio-demographic characteristics, obstetric history and intrapartum care variables. METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving 277 women who had given birth in a low risk maternity unit in Northern Italy was undertaken. Satisfaction with birth was measured using the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (I-BSS-R). The scale comprises three Sub-Scales: quality of care provided, personal attributes of women and stress experienced during childbirth. FINDINGS: No socio-demographic variables were related to maternal satisfaction. Multiparous women had a higher satisfaction score (p=0.020; CI:0.23;2.75). Antenatal class attendance was negatively associated with maternal satisfaction (p=0.038; CI:-2.58; -0.07). Intrapartum variables that significantly reduced maternal satisfaction were: epidural usage (p=0.000; CI:-4.66; -2.07), active phase >12h (p=0.000; CI:-6.01; -2.63), oxytocin administration (p=0.000; CI:-5.08; -2.29) and vacuum assisted birth (p=0.001; CI:-6.50; -1.58). Women with an intact perineum were more likely to be satisfied (p=0.008; CI:-4.60; -0.69). DISCUSSION: In accordance with other research, we showed that intrapartum interventions are negatively associated with maternal outcomes and therefore also with maternal satisfaction with birth. The sub-scale that measured Quality of Care provided scored higher than the other two Sub-Scales. CONCLUSION: Further studies on maternal satisfaction in Italy should be conducted, using the I-BSS-R with the aim to compare outcomes and understand what matters to women during childbirth.

Intrapartum care quality indicators: a literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Quality of care is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of the maternal and newborn health, mainly with respect to care around labor and delivery and in the immediate postnatal period. The aim of this review was to identify the recommended intrapartum care indicators in order to measure the quality of midwifery care. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A structured literature search was conducted in August 2017 incorporating English and Italian language studies from 1993 and onwards to identify published articles on quality standards of intrapartum care. Research was performed into the area of enquiry in electronic database (Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Trip) and in relevant midwifery websites. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 369 quality indicators to measure the intrapartum care. Following a systematic process that allows to classify all indicators in domains and categories, we analyzed 268 outcome and process indicators specifically designated to monitor the intrapartum care in a low risk population. Through the identification of further exclusion criteria and semantic analogies we obtained 80 final quality indicators (39 outcome indicators and 41 process indicators). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 80 indicators that should be used to measure the quality of low risk intrapartum care. Although the majority of indicators we could monitor through hospital databases and the Italian Birth Register-CeDAP are outcome indicators, it is important to give attention also to process indicators that measure the activities performed and whether or not they are evidence-based. For a low risk population they could measure adherence with guidelines that promote and support the normality of the process.