Registro de linfomas cutáneos primarios de la AEDV: primer año de funcionamiento / The First Year of the AEVD Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: Los linfomas primarios cutáneos son enfermedades poco frecuentes. Este artículo describe el Registro de linfomas cutáneos primarios de la AEDV y sus primeros resultados. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Registro de enfermedad de pacientes con linfomas cutáneos primarios. Los centros participantes recogieron datos prospectivamente de todos los pacientes, incluyendo datos del diagnóstico, de los tratamientos, de las pruebas realizadas y del estado actual del paciente. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo. RESULTADOS: En diciembre del 2017 el registro tenía datos de 639 pacientes pertenecientes a 16 hospitales universitarios. Un 60% eran hombres y los diagnósticos, por orden de frecuencia, fueron: micosis fungoide/síndrome de Sézary (MF/SS) (348 casos; 55%), linfoma cutáneo primario de células B (LCCB) (184; 29%), trastorno linfoproliferativo de células T CD30+ (LTCD30+) (70; 11%) y otro tipo de linfoma T (OLT) (37; 5%). El número de casos incidentes recogidos durante el primer año fue de 105 (16,5%). En los pacientes con MF/SS, el diagnóstico más frecuente fue MF clásica (77,3%). La mitad de estos casos se diagnosticaron en estadio IA. La mayoría de los pacientes estaban en remisión parcial (32,5%) o enfermedad estable (33,1%). Los tratamientos más usados fueron los corticoides tópicos (90,8%) seguidos de fototerapia. En los pacientes con LCCB el diagnóstico más frecuente fue el linfoma de la zona marginal (50%). Casi todos los pacientes tuvieron afectación exclusivamente cutánea y casi la mitad fue T1a. La mayoría (76,1%) estaba en remisión completa. Los tratamientos más utilizados fueron la cirugía (55,4%) y la radioterapia (41,9%). En los pacientes con LTCD30+, el diagnóstico más frecuente fue la papulosis linfomatoide (68,6%). La mayoría fueron clasificados T3b (31,4%). La mitad de los casos estaban en remisión completa. Los tratamientos más frecuentes fueron los esteroides tópicos (68,6%), seguidos de la quimioterapia sistémica (32,9%). CONCLUSIÓN: Las características del paciente con linfoma cutáneo primario en España no difieren de otras series descritas en la literatura. El registro facilitará al grupo de linfomas de la AEDV realizar investigación clínica

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Primary cutaneous lymphomas are uncommon. This article describes the Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) and reports on the results from the first year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Disease registry for patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma. The participating hospitals prospectively recorded data on diagnosis, treatment, tests, and disease stage for all patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: In December 2017, the registry contained data on 639 patients (60% male) from 16 university hospitals. The most common diagnoses, in order of frequency, were mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) (348 cases, 55%), primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (CBCL) (184 cases, 29%), primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (CD30+ CLPD) (70 cases, 11%), and other types of T-cell lymphoma (37 cases, 5%). In total, 105 (16.5%) of the cases recorded were incident cases. The most common diagnosis in the MF/SS group was classic MF (77.3%). Half of the patients with MF had stage IA disease when diagnosed, and the majority were either in partial remission (32.5%) or had stable disease (33.1%). The most widely used treatments were topical coricosteroids (90.8%) and phototherapy. The most common form of primary CBCL was marginal zone lymphoma (50%). Almost all of the patients had cutaneous involvement only and nearly half had stage T1a disease. Most (76.1%) were in complete remission. The main treatments were surgery (55.4%) and radiotherapy (41.9%). The most common diagnosis in patients with CD30+ CLPD was lymphomatoid papulosis (68.8%). Most of the patients (31.4%) had stage T3b disease and half were in complete remission. The most common treatments were topical corticosteroids (68.8%) and systemic chemotherapy (32.9%). CONCLUSION: The characteristics of patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma in Spain do not differ from those described in other series in the literature. The registry will facilitate clinical research by the AEDV's lymphoma group

The First Year of the AEVD Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry. / Registro de linfomas cutáneos primarios de la AEDV: primer año de funcionamiento.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Primary cutaneous lymphomas are uncommon. This article describes the Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) and reports on the results from the first year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Disease registry for patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma. The participating hospitals prospectively recorded data on diagnosis, treatment, tests, and disease stage for all patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: In December 2017, the registry contained data on 639 patients (60% male) from 16 university hospitals. The most common diagnoses, in order of frequency, were mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) (348 cases, 55%), primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (CBCL) (184 cases, 29%), primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (CD30+ CLPD) (70 cases, 11%), and other types of T-cell lymphoma (37 cases, 5%). In total, 105 (16.5%) of the cases recorded were incident cases. The most common diagnosis in the MF/SS group was classic MF (77.3%). Half of the patients with MF had stage IA disease when diagnosed, and the majority were either in partial remission (32.5%) or had stable disease (33.1%). The most widely used treatments were topical corticosteroids (90.8%) and phototherapy. The most common form of primary CBCL was marginal zone lymphoma (50%). Almost all of the patients had cutaneous involvement only and nearly half had stage T1a disease. Most (76.1%) were in complete remission. The main treatments were surgery (55.4%) and radiotherapy (41.9%). The most common diagnosis in patients with CD30+ CLPD was lymphomatoid papulosis (68.8%). Most of the patients (31.4%) had stage T3b disease and half were in complete remission. The most common treatments were topical corticosteroids (68.8%) and systemic chemotherapy (32.9%). CONCLUSION: The characteristics of patients with primary cutaneous lymphoma in Spain do not differ from those described in other series in the literature. The registry will facilitate clinical research by the AEDV's lymphoma group.

Successful Short Desensitization Treatment Protocol with Narrowband UVB Phototherapy (TL-01) in Polymorphic Light Eruption / Protocolo de desensibilización corto y eficaz con NB-UVB (TL-01) en la Erupción Polimorfo Lumínica

Introduction: Polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is a common idiopathic photodermatosis that typically presents with pruritic papular or papulovesicular lesions on sun-exposed skin between spring and autumn. In many subjects PLE is mild, and can usually be prevented by the use of broad-spectrum topical sunscreens and a gradual increase in sunlight exposure. However, in some individuals, sunlight exposure results in florid PLE and they often benefit from prophylactic desensitization treatment using phototherapy in early spring, an artificial method that induces a "hardening" phenomenon. Objective: To describe and evaluate the efficacy of a short desensitization protocol, based on a one-month-treatment, administered twice a week with narrow band UVB in subjects with severe polymorphic light eruption (PLE). Methods: A retrospective, open planned and non-randomized study to assess the efficacy of UVB phototherapy in prevention of polymorphic light eruption. Results: Fifteen subjects diagnosed with severe PLE were treated with the standard protocol in our Photobiology Unit between 2014 and 2015. The effect of hardening was sustained during follow up in 87.5% of desensitization treatments. A statistically significant association (p<0.05) between the years of duration of the PLE and the response to treatment was found. Conclusions: The effect of hardening was maintained in the vast majority of subjects, obtaining a good benefit with no PLE episodes during all the summer. We demonstrate that our standard protocol is effective, and produces a successful outcome for the majority of PLE subjects. Our protocol is shorter than those currently applied, being favourable both for the patient and the physician (AU)

Introducción: La erupción polimorfa lumínica (EPL) es una fotodermatosis idiopática que se presenta típicamente en forma de lesiones papulares o pápulo-vesiculosas pruriginosas en áreas fotoexpuestas, típicamente entre primavera y otoño. En la mayoría de pacientes la EPL es leve, y se previene mediante el uso de fotoprotectores y una exposición gradual a la luz solar. En algunos casos la EPL es muy florida, y requiere una desensibilización profiláctica en primavera, que induce fenómeno de hardening. Objetivo: Describir y evaluar la eficacia de un protocolo de desensibilización que se basa en la administración de UVB de banda estrecha, 2 veces a la semana, durante un mes. Resultados: Se trataron un total de 15 sujetos con el protocolo de desensibilización entre los años 2014 y 2015. Se realizaron un total de 24 tratamientos. El efecto hardening se mantuvo en el 87,5% de los casos tratados. Se encontró una asociación estadísticamente significativa (p<0,05) entre los años de progresión de la enfermedad y la respuesta al tratamiento. Conclusiones: Los efectos del hardening se mantuvieron en la mayoría de los sujetos, los cuales presentaron un buen control de la EPL y ausencia de brotes durante el verano. Se demuestra la efectividad del protocolo de desensibilización en los sujetos con EPL, el cual tiene una duración más corta que los previamente descritos en la literatura (AU)

Global patterns of care in advanced stage mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome: a multicenter retrospective follow-up study from the Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF)/Sézary syndrome (SS) patients are weighted by an unfavorable prognosis and share an unmet clinical need of effective treatments. International guidelines are available detailing treatment options for the different stages but without recommending treatments in any particular order due to lack of comparative trials. The aims of this second CLIC study were to retrospectively analyze the pattern of care worldwide for advanced-stage MF/SS patients, the distribution of treatments according to geographical areas (USA versus non-USA), and whether the heterogeneity of approaches has potential impact on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 853 patients from 21 specialist centers (14 European, 4 USA, 1 each Australian, Brazilian, and Japanese). RESULTS: Heterogeneity of treatment approaches was found, with up to 24 different modalities or combinations used as first-line and 36% of patients receiving four or more treatments. Stage IIB disease was most frequently treated by total-skin-electron-beam radiotherapy, bexarotene and gemcitabine; erythrodermic and SS patients by extracorporeal photochemotherapy, and stage IVA2 by polychemotherapy. Significant differences were found between USA and non-USA centers, with bexarotene, photopheresis and histone deacetylase inhibitors most frequently prescribed for first-line treatment in USA while phototherapy, interferon, chlorambucil and gemcitabine in non-USA centers. These differences did not significantly impact on survival. However, when considering death and therapy change as competing risk events and the impact of first treatment line on both events, both monochemotherapy (SHR = 2.07) and polychemotherapy (SHR = 1.69) showed elevated relative risks. CONCLUSION: This large multicenter retrospective study shows that there exist a large treatment heterogeneity in advanced MF/SS and differences between USA and non-USA centers but these were not related to survival, while our data reveal that chemotherapy as first treatment is associated with a higher risk of death and/or change of therapy and thus other therapeutic options should be preferable as first treatment approach.

Successful Short Desensitization Treatment Protocol with Narrowband UVB Phototherapy (TL-01) in Polymorphic Light Eruption.

INTRODUCTION: Polymorphic light eruption (PLE) is a common idiopathic photodermatosis that typically presents with pruritic papular or papulovesicular lesions on sun-exposed skin between spring and autumn. In many subjects PLE is mild, and can usually be prevented by the use of broad-spectrum topical sunscreens and a gradual increase in sunlight exposure. However, in some individuals, sunlight exposure results in florid PLE and they often benefit from prophylactic desensitization treatment using phototherapy in early spring, an artificial method that induces a "hardening" phenomenon. OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the efficacy of a short desensitization protocol, based on a one-month-treatment, administered twice a week with narrow band UVB in subjects with severe polymorphic light eruption (PLE). METHODS: A retrospective, open planned and non-randomized study to assess the efficacy of UVB phototherapy in prevention of polymorphic light eruption. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects diagnosed with severe PLE were treated with the standard protocol in our Photobiology Unit between 2014 and 2015. The effect of hardening was sustained during follow up in 87.5% of desensitization treatments. A statistically significant association (p<0.05) between the years of duration of the PLE and the response to treatment was found. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of hardening was maintained in the vast majority of subjects, obtaining a good benefit with no PLE episodes during all the summer. We demonstrate that our standard protocol is effective, and produces a successful outcome for the majority of PLE subjects. Our protocol is shorter than those currently applied, being favourable both for the patient and the physician.

Uremic tumoral calcinosis in patients receiving longterm hemodialysis therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze a series of uremic tumoral calcinosis (UTC) in patients receiving longterm dialysis therapy. METHODS: Twelve patients receiving longterm hemodialysis affected by tumoral calcinosis were analyzed. Clinical, radiological, and pathological features were evaluated and pathogenic factors were reviewed. RESULTS: The most common sites for UTC were the elbow, hip, hand, and wrist. The lesions were multiple (67%, n = 8), of large size, and symptomatic with joint mobility impairment (75%, n = 9) as well as nerve compression (33%, n = 4). High serum calcium and phosphate concentrations were detected in 50% (n = 6) and 100% of the patients, respectively. An increased calcium-phosphorus product (Ca x P) was observed in all patients, either due to overt secondary hyperparathyroidism (42%, n = 5), or secondary to iatrogenic hypercalcemia and/or severe hyperphosphoremia of multifactorial etiology (i.e., prolonged and excessive administration of calcitriol and calcium carbonate, insufficient dialysis and inadequate phosphorus chelating therapy, etc.) (58%, n = 7). Several treatment strategies were followed (surgical excision, parathyroidectomy, renal transplant) in combination with aggressive medical therapy to decrease Ca x P product, achieving complete remission in 83% of the patients. CONCLUSION: UTC lesions show clinical and pathogenic features that differ from those of idiopathic tumoral calcinosis. The most important pathogenic factor involved in UTC is an increase in Ca x P, not necessarily related to hyperparathyroidism. Combined treatment strategies allow complete remission in a high proportion of patients. A low Ca x P is necessary to prevent development of UTC.