RESUMEN
Background: Systemic arterial hypertension is one of the most common cardiovascular risks, corresponding to 45% of deaths involving CVDs. The use of natural products, such as medicinal plants, belongs to a millennial part of human therapeutics history and has been employed as an alternative anti-hypertensive treatment. Objective: The present review aims to prospect some natural products already experimentally assayed against arterial hypertension through scientific virtual libraries and patent documents over the past 20 years. Search strategy. This is a systematic review of the adoption of the PRISMA protocol and a survey of the scientific literature that synthesizes the results from published articles between 2001 and 2020 concerning the use of medicinal plants in the management of hypertension, including which parts of the plant or organism are used, as well as the mechanisms of action underlying the anti-hypertensive effect. Furthermore, a technological prospection was also carried out in patent offices from different countries in order to check technologies based on natural products claimed for the treatment or prevention of hypertension. Inclusion criteria. Scientific articles where a natural product had been experimentally assayed for anti-hypertensive activity (part of plants, plant extracts, and products derived from other organisms) were included. Data extraction and analysis. The selected abstracts of the articles and patent documents were submitted to a rigorous reading process. Those articles and patents that were not related to anti-hypertensive effects and claimed potential applications were excluded from the search. Results: Eighty specimens of biological species that showed anti-hypertensive activity were recovered, with 01 representative from the kingdom Fungi and 02 from the kingdom Protista, with emphasis on the families Asteraceae and Lamiaceae, with 6 representatives each. Leaves and aerial parts were the most used parts of the plants for the extraction of anti-hypertensive products, with maceration being the most used extraction method. Regarding phytochemical analyses, the most described classes of biomolecules in the reviewed works were alkaloids, terpenes, coumarins, flavonoids, and peptides, with the reduction of oxidative stress and the release of NO among the mechanisms of action most involved in this process. Regarding the number of patent filings, China was the country that stood out as the main one, with 813 registrations. Conclusion: The anti-hypertensive activity of natural products is still little explored in Western countries. Besides, China and India have shown more results in this area than other countries, confirming the strong influence of traditional medicine in these countries.
RESUMEN
Nitro fatty acids (NFAs) are endogenously generated lipid mediators deriving from reactions of unsaturated electrophilic fatty acids with reactive nitrogen species. Furthermore, Mediterranean diets can be a source of NFA. These highly electrophilic fatty acids can undergo Michael addition reaction with cysteine residues, leading to post-translational modifications (PTM) of selected regulatory proteins. Such modifications are capable of changing target protein function during cell signaling or in biosynthetic pathways. NFA target proteins include the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ), the pro-inflammatory and tumorigenic nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway, the pro-inflammatory 5-lipoxygenases (5-LO) biosynthesis pathway as well as soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH), which is essentially involved in the regulation of vascular tone. In several animal models of inflammation and cancer, the therapeutic efficacy of well-tolerated NFA has been demonstrated. This has already led to clinical phase II studies investigating possible therapeutic effects of NFA in subjects with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Albeit Michael acceptors feature a broad spectrum of bioactivity, they have for a rather long time been avoided as drug candidates owing to their presumed unselective reactivity and toxicity. However, targeted covalent modification of regulatory proteins by Michael acceptors became recognized as a promising approach to drug discovery with the recent FDA approvals of the cancer therapeutics, afatanib (2013), ibrutinib (2013), and osimertinib (2015). Furthermore, the Michael acceptor, neratinib, a dual inhibitor of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor, was recently approved by the FDA (2017) and by the EMA (2018) for the treatment of breast cancer. Finally, a number of further Michael acceptor drug candidates are currently under clinical investigation for pharmacotherapy of inflammation and cancer. In this review, we focus on the pharmacology of NFA and other Michael acceptor drugs, summarizing their potential as an emerging class of future antiphlogistics and adjuvant in tumor therapeutics.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: On-demand phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) monotherapy is a first-line treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), but 30%-40% of patients exhibit little or no response. The success rate of alprostadil therapy is high in these patients, but this treatment requires painful intracavernosal injection. AIM: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of second-line oral pharmacologic combination therapies of ED when PDE5i monotherapy fails. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched to identify reports providing quantitative data on the treatment of ED in patients failing PDE5i monotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The measures of erectile function were the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Erectile Function Domain (EFD). RESULTS: Chronic treatment with the PDE5i tadalafil alone or in combination with sildenafil on demand showed similar IIEF-5 score improvements. None of the 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients who had failed PDE5i monotherapy found a superior effect on IIEF scores from the combination of androgen plus PDE5i compared with PDE5i monotherapy. Combination therapy with androgen supplementation and PDE5i appears safe. In 1 RCT, combination therapy with PDE5i and an α1-adrenoceptor antagonist was not superior to PDE5i monotherapy. Six other studies, each with a different combination of PDE5i and another drug (eg, metformin, folic acid, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors), were identified, but further research is required to investigate their efficacy in treating ED. CONCLUSION: For ED, chronic treatment with low-dose PDE5i can be attempted when standard on-demand regimens fail. Combination therapy with androgen supplementation and a PDE5i appears to be safe. The combination of an α1-adrenoceptor antagonist and PDE5i shows no advantageous effect on ED compared with PDE5i monotherapy. The efficacy of combining PDE5i with metformin, folic acid, or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors is uncertain and requires further research. There is an unmet need for oral treatment of ED in nonresponders to PDE5i treatment. Munk NE, Knudsen JS, Comerma-Steffensen S, et al. Systematic Review of Oral Combination Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction When Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Monotherapy Fails. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:430-441.