Urogenital manifestations in Wegener granulomatosis: a study of 11 cases and review of the literature.

We describe the main characteristics and treatment of urogenital manifestations in patients with Wegener granulomatosis (WG). We conducted a retrospective review of the charts of 11 patients with WG. All patients were men, and their median age at WG diagnosis was 53 years (range, 21-70 yr). Urogenital involvement was present at onset of WG in 9 cases (81%), it was the first clinical evidence of WG in 2 cases (18%), and was a symptom of WG relapse in 6 cases (54%). Symptomatic urogenital involvement included prostatitis (n = 4) (with suspicion of an abscess in 1 case), orchitis (n = 4), epididymitis (n = 1), a renal pseudotumor (n = 2), ureteral stenosis (n = 1), and penile ulceration (n = 1). Urogenital symptoms rapidly resolved after therapy with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. Several patients underwent a surgical procedure, either at the time of diagnosis (n = 3) (consisting of an open nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy for suspicion of carcinoma, suprapubic cystostomy for acute urinary retention), or during follow-up (n = 3) (consisting of ureteral double J stents for ureteral stenosis, and prostate transurethral resection because of dysuria). After a mean follow-up of 56 months, urogenital relapse occurred in 4 patients (36%). Urogenital involvement can be the first clinical evidence of WG. Some presentations, such as a renal or prostate mass that mimics cancer or an abscess, should be assessed to avoid unnecessary radical surgery. Urogenital symptoms can be promptly resolved with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. However, surgical procedures, such as prostatic transurethral resection, may be mandatory in patients with persistent symptoms.

[Interstitial mycosis fungoid: a rare variant of mycosis fungoids. Two cases]. / Le MF interstitiel : une variante rare de mycosis fongoïde.

Mycosis fungoids can present with various clinical and histological features, with only a few of them being recognized as distinct entities in the current WHO and EORTC classifications. Histologically, mycosis fungoids (MF) usually show a superficial perivascular or band-like lymphocytic infiltrate with epidermotropism. We here report two cases of a rare histological variant of MF, called interstitial in the literature. Our first patient, a 71-year-old male, had a previously diagnosed MF, which clinically evolved towards nodules, showing histologically an interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate without epidermotropism and without large cell transformation. The second patient was a 64-year-old female with widespread plaques and nodules. Histologically, a dense dermal interstitial infiltrate was observed, with foci of epidermotropism, without large cell transformation. At relapse after treatment, she presented with plaques, papules and nodules, histologically showing a slight interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate that resembled granuloma annulare or inflammatory morphea. In both patients, clinical aspect suggested MF and a dominant T-cell clone was found in lesional skin. Nodules in MF are not always the hallmark of large cell transformation, but may correspond to unusual interstitial lesions. Diagnosis of such rare variant may be difficult and requires a good clinical pathological correlation together with the search for foci of epidermotropism on skin biopsy and for a dominant cutaneous T-cell clone.