Biotherapeutics in non-clinical development: Strengthening the interface between safety, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and manufacturing.

Biological drugs comprise a wide field of different modalities with respect to structure, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological function. Considerable non-clinical experience in the development of proteins (e.g. insulin) and antibodies has been accumulated over the past thirty years. In order to improve the efficacy and the safety of these biotherapeutics, Fc modifications (e.g. Fc silent antibody versions), combinations (antibody-drug conjugates, protein-nanoparticle combinations), and new constructs (darpins, fynomers) have been introduced. In the last decade, advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) in research and development have become a considerable and strongly growing part of the biotherapeutic portfolio. ATMPs consisting of gene and cell therapy modalities or even combinations of them, further expand the level of complexity, which already exists in non-clinical development strategies for biological drugs and has thereby led to a further diversification of expertise in safety and PKPD assessment of biological drugs. It is the fundamental rationale of the BioSafe meetings, held yearly in the EU and in the US, to convene experts on a regular basis and foster knowledge exchange and mutual understanding in this fast growing area. In order to reflect at least partially the variety of the biotherapeutics field, the 2016 EU BioSafe meeting addressed the following topics in six sessions: (i) In vitro Meets in vivo to Leverage Biologics Development (ii) New developments and regulatory considerations in the cell and gene therapy field (iii) CMC Challenges with Biologics development (iv) Minipigs in non-clinical safety assessment (v) Opportunities of PKPD Assessment in Less Common Administration Routes In the breakout sessions the following questions were discussed: (i) Cynomolgus monkey as a reprotoxicology Species: Impact of Immunomodulators on Early Pregnancy Maintenance (ii) Safety Risk of Inflammation and Autoimmunity Induced by Immunomodulators (iii) Experience with non-GMP Material in Pivotal Non-clinical Safety Studies to Support First in Man (FiM) Trials (iv) Safety Assessment of Combination Products for Non-oncology.

Modulation of oral squamous cell carcinoma incidence in rats via diet and a novel calcium channel antagonist.

An unexpected dose related increase in oral squamous cell carcinomas was observed in a standard 2-year carcinogenicity study with a novel calcium channel blocker, in which Wistar rats received daily doses of 0, 1.5, 7, 20, or 40 mg/kg of the compound mixed with a standard diet containing fibers from barley. This finding was associated with an increased incidence of severe (destructive) periodontitis and the formation of oro-nasal fistulae at the 2 highest doses. Five assays of the compound for genotoxicity were negative indicating that a genotoxic effect was highly improbable. To investigate the underlying pathogenic mechanisms a second 2-year study in the same strain of rats was initiated and the influence of the diet and/or a possible local irritancy by the drug was assessed. In this second study the compound was administered by oral gavage at daily doses of 0, 7, or 40 mg/kg (later reduced to 20 mg/kg due to systemic intolerance) to rats maintained either on the standard diet or on a low fiber diet assumed to be less aggressive in terms of inducing periodontal lesions. Dose dependent gingival overgrowth (a class-related effect) was observed in the incisor and molar teeth area of all treated groups but was independent of the diet used. No oral tumors were found in the standard diet or low fiber diet controls and all treatment groups fed the low fiber diet, whereas in the high-dose group fed the standard diet a total of 8 oral squamous cell carcinomas were detected in association with an increased incidence of severe periodontitis. These results indicate that the increased incidence of squamous cell carcinomas observed upon chronic administration of the compound is not due to a direct tumorigenic effect of the drug. Tumor formation is attributable to severe periodontal disease favored by the diet and class related gingival overgrowth.