Daily versus every other day oral iron supplementation in patients with iron deficiency anemia (DEODO): study protocol for a phase 3 multicentered, pragmatic, open-label, pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) accounts for the majority of anemia cases across the globe and can lead to impairments in both physical and cognitive functioning. Oral iron supplementation is the first line of treatment to improve the hemoglobin level for IDA patients. However, gaps still exist in understanding the appropriate dosing regimen of oral iron. The current trial proposes to evaluate the feasibility of performing this study to examine the effectiveness and side-effect profile of oral iron once daily versus every other day. METHODS: In this open-label, pilot, feasibility, randomized controlled trial, 52 outpatients over 16 years of age with IDA (defined as hemoglobin < 12.0 g/dL in females and < 13.0 g/dL in males and ferritin < 30 mcg/L) will be enrolled across two large academic hospitals. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 300 mg oral ferrous sulfate (60 mg of elemental iron) either every day or every other day for 12 weeks. Participants are excluded if they are as follows: (1) pregnant and/or currently breastfeeding, (2) have a disease history that would impair response to oral iron (e.g., thalassemia, celiac disease), (3) intolerant and/or have an allergy to oral iron or vitamin C, (4) on new anticoagulants in the past 6 months, (5) received IV iron therapy in the past 12 weeks, (6) have surgery, chemotherapy, or blood donation planned in upcoming 12 weeks, (7) a creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, or (8) hemoglobin less than 8.0 g/dL with active bleeding. The primary outcome is feasibility to enroll 52 participants in this trial over a 2-year period to determine the effectiveness of daily versus every other day oral iron supplementation on hemoglobin at 12 weeks post-initiation and side-effect profile. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial will provide additional evidence for an appropriate dosing schedule for treating patients with IDA with oral iron supplementation. Additional knowledge will be gained on how the dosing regimen of oral iron impacts quality of life and hemoglobin repletion in IDA patients. If this trial is deemed feasible, it will inform the development and implementation of a larger multicenter definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03725384 . Registered 31 October 2018.

Impact of red blood cell alloimmunization on fetal and neonatal outcomes: A single center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Alloimmunization can impact both the fetus and neonate. STUDY OBJECTIVES: (a) calculate the incidence of clinically significant RBC isoimmunization during pregnancy, (b) review maternal management and neonatal outcomes, (c) assess the value of prenatal and postnatal serological testing in predicting neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective audit of consecutive alloimmunized pregnancies was conducted. Data collected included demographics, clinical outcomes, and laboratory results. Outcomes included: incidence of alloimmunization; outcomes for neonates with and without the cognate antigen; and sensitivity and specificity of antibody titration testing in predicting hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). RESULTS: Over 6 years, 128 pregnant women (0.4%) were alloimmunized with 162 alloantibodies; anti-E was the most common alloantibody (51/162; 31%). Intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) were employed in 2 (3%) of 71 mothers of cognate antigen positive (CoAg+) neonates. Of 74 CoAg+ neonates, 58% required observation alone, 23% intensive phototherapy, 9% top up transfusion, and 3% exchange transfusion; no fetal or neonatal deaths occurred. HDFN was diagnosed in 28% (21/74) of neonates; anti-D was the most common cause. The sensitivity and specificity of the critical gel titer >32 in predicting HDFN were 76% and 75%, respectively (negative predictive value 95%; positive predictive value 36%). The sensitivity and specificity of a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) in predicting HDFN were 90% and 58%, respectively (NPV 97%; PPV 29%). CONCLUSION: Morbidity and mortality related to HDFN was low; most alloimmunized pregnancies needed minimal intervention. Titers of >32 by gel warrant additional monitoring during pregnancy.

Complications of a severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia crisis: transfusional iron overload and gangrenous cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Evans syndrome is a rare autoimmune disorder that is defined by the simultaneous or sequential presence of two or more cytopenias without an obvious underlying precipitating cause. Evans syndrome usually follows a chronic relapsing and remitting course and is quite rare, making it difficult to evaluate in clinical studies. CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old male patient with a 17-year history of Evans syndrome presented with fulminant autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). He presented with a markedly elevated C-reactive protein (CRP; 46 mg/L [normal, 0-5 mg/L]) before onset of a decrease in hemoglobin. He required the transfusion of 20 units of red blood cells while awaiting response to aggressive immunosuppressive therapy including high-dose corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobin therapy, and rituximab. He achieved a complete hematologic response. RESULTS: His postdischarge course was complicated by acute cholecystitis requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In addition, his transfusional iron overload requiring 16 phlebotomies to reduce his ferritin level from 4933 µg/L to 326 µg/L, with phlebotomies ongoing every 2 weeks to achieve a ferritin level of less than 100 µg/L. CONCLUSION: Neither transfusional iron overload nor acute cholecystitis are well-recognized complications of a severe episode of AIHA. An elevated CRP has been recently recognized as an important prognostic marker in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and this case suggests a need to evaluate its utility in AIHA.