Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair ; 27(3): 200-7, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23042834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The primary goal was to determine whether repetitive functional electrical stimulation (FES) for unilateral foot drop increases tibialis anterior (TA) muscle size compared with an untreated baseline and the contralateral side in cerebral palsy (CP). Secondary goals were to determine whether positive changes in muscle size and gait, if found, accumulated during the 3 intervals during which participants used the device. FES devices differ from traditional orthoses that often restrict muscle activation and may exacerbate weakness, promote continued dependence on orthoses, or precipitate functional decline. METHODS: Participants were 14 independent ambulators with inadequate dorsiflexion in swing, with a mean age of 13.1 years, evaluated before and after the 3-month baseline, 1-month device accommodation, 3-month primary intervention, and 3-month follow-up phases. The FES device (WalkAide) stimulated the common fibular nerve to dorsiflex the ankle and evert the foot while monitoring use. TA muscle ultrasound, gait velocity, and ankle kinematic data for barefoot and device conditions are reported. RESULTS: Ultrasound measures of TA anatomic cross-sectional area and muscle thickness increased in the intervention compared with baseline and with the contralateral side and were maintained at follow-up. Maximum ankle dorsiflexion decreased at baseline but improved or was maintained during the intervention phase with and without the device, respectively. Muscle size gains were preserved at follow-up, but barefoot ankle motion returned to baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: This FES device produced evidence of use-dependent muscle plasticity in CP. Permanent improvements in voluntary ankle control after repetitive stimulation were not demonstrated.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral/terapia , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Equipos y Suministros/normas , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/fisiopatología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tobillo/fisiopatología , Parálisis Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Parálisis Cerebral/fisiopatología , Niño , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Prevención Secundaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
2.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 54(11): 1044-9, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22924431

RESUMEN

AIM: Ankle-foot orthoses are the standard of care for foot drop in cerebral palsy (CP), but may overly constrain ankle movement and limit function in those with mild CP. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) may be a less restrictive and more effective alternative, but has rarely been used in CP. The primary objective of this study was to conduct the first trial in CP examining the acceptability and clinical effectiveness of a novel, commercially available device that delivers FES to stimulate ankle dorsiflexion. METHOD: Twenty-one individuals were enrolled (Gross Motor Function Classification System [GMFCS] levels I and II, mean age 13y 2mo). Gait analyses in FES and non-FES conditions were performed at two walking speeds over a 4 month period of device use. Measures included ankle kinematics and spatiotemporal variables. Differences between conditions were revealed using repeated measures multivariate analyses of variance. RESULTS: Nineteen individuals (nine females, 10 males; mean age 12y 11mo, range 7y 5mo to 19y 11mo; 11 at GMFCS level I, eight at level II) completed the FES intervention, with all but one choosing to continue using FES beyond that phase. Average daily use was 5.6 hours (SD 2.3). Improved dorsiflexion was observed during swing (mean and peak) and at foot-floor contact, with partial preservation of ankle plantarflexion at toe-off when using the FES at self-selected and fast walking speeds. Gait speed was unchanged. INTERPRETATION: This FES device was well accepted and effective for foot drop in those with mild gait impairments from CP.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral/complicaciones , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Enfermedades del Pie/terapia , Ortesis del Pié/normas , Marcha/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Parálisis Cerebral/terapia , Niño , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Femenino , Enfermedades del Pie/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Nervio Peroneo/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA