Nutritional Management of Athletes with Type 1 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) represents a complex clinical challenge for health systems. The autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells leads to a complete lack of insulin production, exposing people to a lifelong risk of acute (DKA, coma) and chronic complications (macro and microvascular). Physical activity (PA) has widely demonstrated its efficacy in helping diabetes treatment. Nutritional management of people living with T1DM is particularly difficult. Balancing macronutrients, their effects on glycemic control, and insulin treatment represents a complex clinical challenge for the diabetologist. The effects of PA on glycemic control are largely unpredictable depending on many individual factors, such as intensity, nutrient co-ingestion, and many others. Due to this clinical complexity, we have reviewed the actual scientific literature in depth to help diabetologists, sport medicine doctors, nutritionists, and all the health figures involved in diabetes care to ameliorate both glycemic control and the nutritional status of T1DM people engaging in PA. Two electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) were searched from their inception to January 2024. The main recommendations for carbohydrate and protein ingestion before, during, and immediately after PA are explained. Glycemic management during such activity is widely reviewed. Micronutrient needs and nutritional supplement effects are also highlighted in this paper.

Bone Health Care Pathway for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients on Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Survival rates of prostate cancer (PCa) patients have improved considerably as a result of earlier diagnosis and therapies, including radiotherapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients on ADT develop cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and a high risk of fragility fractures. Bone health (BH) assessment is strongly recommended, together with timely initiation of treatments, to counteract CTIBL and preserve bone strength. Therefore, we decided to develop an interdisciplinary pathway of care (IPC) dedicated to non-metastatic PCa patients on long-term ADT and RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An interdisciplinary team allocated resources to support an IPC to manage patients' CTIBL and prevent fragility fractures. The team provided a diagnostic and therapeutic workflow according to patients' and professional perspectives, consistent with recommendations and healthcare policies. The hospital's quality department certified the IPC, the Ethical Committee approved procedures over the workflow. The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) standards inspired services and professionals' activities and interactions. RESULTS: Preliminary data support the feasibility of the IPC from professionals' and patients' perspectives. Median age of the enrolled patients was 75 years, more than a half (58.9%) had low grade osteopenia or normal BMD (T-score ≥-1.5 standard deviation, SD), while 23.5% and 17.6% had osteoporosis and osteopenia, respectively. The IPC meets the requirements of a FLS concerning crucial indicators. CONCLUSION: Our IPC was a suitable approach to assure timely identification, assessment, initiation, and monitoring of adherence to anti-fracture treatments among non-metastatic PCa patients on long-term ADT and RT. Further data are required to show its effectiveness on fragility fracture prevention.