Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(8): 1773-1777, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33609262

RESUMEN

With rising antibiotic resistance, alternatives to carbapenems are needed for acute cholangitis (AC). Temocillin reaches high biliary concentrations with limited impact on microbiota. We retrospectively included 140 AC episodes and assessed the efficacy of temocillin using microbiology susceptibility testing from blood cultures. Considering all bacteria collected by episode, resistance to temocillin, PIP/TAZ and 3GC occurred in 27/140 (26%), 32 (22.8%) and 31 (22%) episodes, respectively (p = 0.7). After documentation, temocillin could have spared PIP/TAZ or carbapenems in 14/26 and 4/11 episodes. Temocillin may constitute an alternative treatment after microbiological documentation by sparing carbapenems and/or PIP/TAZ, but not as an empirical therapeutic option.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangitis/microbiología , Penicilinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
PLoS Med ; 15(6): e1002593, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29944651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis for contacts of meningitis cases is not recommended during outbreaks in the African meningitis belt. We assessed the effectiveness of single-dose oral ciprofloxacin administered to household contacts and in village-wide distributions on the overall attack rate (AR) in an outbreak of meningococcal meningitis. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this 3-arm, open-label, cluster-randomized trial during a meningococcal meningitis outbreak in Madarounfa District, Niger, villages notifying a suspected case were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to standard care (the control arm), single-dose oral ciprofloxacin for household contacts within 24 hours of case notification, or village-wide distribution of ciprofloxacin within 72 hours of first case notification. The primary outcome was the overall AR of suspected meningitis after inclusion. A random sample of 20 participating villages was enrolled to document any changes in fecal carriage prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae before and after the intervention. Between April 22 and May 18, 2017, 49 villages were included: 17 to the control arm, 17 to household prophylaxis, and 15 to village-wide prophylaxis. A total of 248 cases were notified in the study after the index cases. The AR was 451 per 100,000 persons in the control arm, 386 per 100,000 persons in the household prophylaxis arm (t test versus control p = 0.68), and 190 per 100,000 persons in the village-wide prophylaxis arm (t test versus control p = 0.032). The adjusted AR ratio between the household prophylaxis arm and the control arm was 0.94 (95% CI 0.52-1.73, p = 0.85), and the adjusted AR ratio between the village-wide prophylaxis arm and the control arm was 0.40 (95% CI 0.19‒0.87, p = 0.022). No adverse events were notified. Baseline carriage prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was 95% and of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was >90%, and did not change post-intervention. One limitation of the study was the small number of cerebrospinal fluid samples sent for confirmatory testing. CONCLUSIONS: Village-wide distribution of single-dose oral ciprofloxacin within 72 hours of case notification reduced overall meningitis AR. Distributions of ciprofloxacin could be an effective tool in future meningitis outbreak responses, but further studies investigating length of protection, effectiveness in urban settings, and potential impact on antimicrobial resistance patterns should be carried out. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02724046.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Epidemias , Meningitis Meningocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Meningitis Meningocócica/epidemiología , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Meningitis Meningocócica/microbiología , Neisseria meningitidis/efectos de los fármacos , Neisseria meningitidis/fisiología , Niger/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 46(6): 653-9, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26508586

RESUMEN

Fluoroquinolone-resistant staphylococci (FQRS) are primarily selected in the nasal microbiota during fluoroquinolone (FQ) treatment. To gain insight into the dynamics of the emergence of FQRS, 49 hospitalised patients (HPs) and 62 community patients (CPs) treated with FQs were studied. Nasal swabs were collected before (T0), at the end of (T1) and 1 month after (T2) FQ treatment. FQRS were identified by mass spectrometry. Antibiotic resistance was determined. Pre- and post-exposure staphylococci populations were compared phenotypically and by MLST to determine the origin of FQRS. At T0, 33/49 HPs (67%) and 24/62 CPs (39%) carried FQRS (OR=3.3, 95% CI: 1.4-7.9; P<0.001). Among patients with no FQRS at T0, 15/16 HPs (94%) and 16/38 CPs (42%) had FQRS detected at T1 and/or T2 (OR=19.6, 95% CI: 2.5-902; P<0.001). Among FQRS having emerged, co-resistance to meticillin was detected in 87% and 82% of HPs and CPs, respectively. No selection of resistance emerging from the initial microbiota was evidenced. FQRS showed decreased species diversity in favour of Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. As a consequence of FQ treatment, acquisition of FQRS in the nasal microbiota is frequent in the community and almost inevitable in hospitals. Acquisition from extranasal sites prevails. A restriction in species diversity in favour of more pathogenic and resistant species occurs. This highlights the major impact of FQ treatment on nasal microbiota, the role of the ecological environment in the emergence of FQRS, and the high-risk of dissemination of resistant staphylococci.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Nariz/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus haemolyticus/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Microbiota/efectos de los fármacos , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA