Mismatch repair deficiency may affect clinical outcome through immune response activation in metastatic gastric cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The microsatellite-instable gastric cancer subtype, because of its supposed high antigenic potential, is a promising candidate for immunotherapy. We analyzed if the presence of a defective mismatch repair (MMR) system is associated with other markers of immune response and their relationship with outcome in advanced gastric cancer patients. METHODS: We analyzed the relationship between clinical outcome and MMR status, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), lymphocytosis, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in metastatic gastric cancer patients treated with a chemotherapy doublet in the first-line setting. Other stratification factors were sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy, metastatic sites, and histotype. RESULTS: One hundred three patients were eligible for analysis. Defective MMR was found in 15 patients (14 %), TILs were found in 18 patients (17 %), lymphocytosis was found in 24 patients (23 %), and high NLR was found in 75 patients (72 %). Significant correlations were found between defective MMR and TIL positivity (p = 0.0004), between defective MMR and lymphocytosis (p = 0.0062), between defective MMR and low NLR (p = 0.000069), and between TIL positivity and lymphocytosis (p = 0.000147). All factors had a statistically significant impact on overall survival, although on multivariate analysis only defective MMR (p = 0.0001) and TIL positivity (p = 0.0192) maintained their independent prognostic role. Similar results were observed for progression-free survival, with defective MMR (p = 0.0001) and TIL positivity (p = 0.0195) maintaining their prognostic role on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis confirms the favorable prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer patients with a defective MMR system and suggests that expression of TILs might also be linked to better outcome. Because of the correlation between defective MMR status and measures of immune system activity, this group of patients would be the best candidates for novel immunotherapy-based therapies.

The role of LDH serum levels in predicting global outcome in HCC patients treated with sorafenib: implications for clinical management.

BACKGROUND: In many tumour types serumlactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels proved to represent an indirect marker of tumour hypoxia, neo-angiogenesis and worse prognosis. As we previously reported LDH is an important predictive factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Sorafenib represents the therapeutic stronghold in advanced HCC patients. As a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) mainly directed against the angiogenetic pathway, the correlation of sorafenib administration with markers of hypoxia could be an important tool in patients management. Aim of our analysis was to evaluate the role of LDH pre-treatment levels and its variation during treatment in HCC patients receiving sorafenib. METHODS: 78 patients were available for our analysis. For all patients LDH values were collected within one month before the start of treatment and after the end of therapy. For study purposes we divided our patients into two groups, according to LDH pre-treatment levels, cut-off levels was determined with ROC curve analysis. Patients were, also, classified according to the variation in LDH serum levels pre- and post-treatment (increased vs decreased). RESULTS: Patients proved homogeneous for all clinical characteristics analyzed. In patients with LDH values under the cut-off median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months, whereas it was 1.9 months in patients above the cut-off (p = 0.0002). Accordingly median overall survival (OS) was 13.2 months and 4.9 months (p = 0.0006). In patients with decreased LDH values after treatment median PFS was 6.8 months, and median OS was 21.0 months, whereas PFS was 2.9 months and OS 8.6 months in patients with increased LDH levels (PFS: p = 0.0087; OS: p = 0.0035). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, LDH seemed able to predict clinical outcome in terms of PFS and OS for HCC patients treated with sorafenib. Given the correlation between LDH levels and tumour angiogenesis we can speculate that patients with high LDH pretreatment levels may be optimal candidates for other emerging therapeutic agents or strategies targeting different molecular pathways.

Sorafenib in advanced iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: efficacy, safety and exploratory analysis of role of serum thyroglobulin and FDG-PET.

CONTEXT: Radioactive iodine is a crucial tool for treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). In 5% of cases, DTCs lose I-131 avidity and assume an aggressive behaviour. Treatment options for iodine-refractory DTC are limited. We report the experience of off-label use of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib for treatment of advanced iodine-refractory DTC. DESIGN: Patients with progressive DTC refractory to radioactive iodine were treated with sorafenib used off-label independently from their performance status. Primary study end-points were radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary end-points were site-specific radiological response and overall survival (OS). An exploratory analysis of the role of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 15·5 months. Clinical benefit was obtained in 71% of subjects (30% partial response and 41% stable disease). Sorafenib was mostly well tolerated, but a high incidence of fatal events was reported (three patients died from severe bleeding events and two from cardiac arrest). Median PFS was 9 months. Median OS was 10 months. The best responses were observed in lymph nodes and lung. Baseline Tg levels and the Tg response to treatment were correlated to both radiological response and PFS. Baseline FDG-PET assessment and early FDG-PET response were correlated to radiological response. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib allows morphological disease control in the majority of patients with iodine-refractory DTC. Progression-free survival and overall survival were lower than in previous studies as a consequence of the worse clinical condition of our patients. Sorafenib is mostly well tolerated but could have been responsible for the reported fatal events. Baseline Tg and the Tg response to treatment could be useful for predicting morphological response and clinical outcome. Early FDG-PET response could be helpful for the timely identification of nonresponding patients.

Evolving strategies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: from clinical-guided to molecularly-tailored therapeutic options.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) is the commonest primary liver cancer (80-90%) and represents the leading cause of cancer-related death, after lung and stomach cancer. The process of neoplastic transformation proceeds through the accumulation of mutations in the genes governing cell proliferation and apoptosis. It is currently difficult to determine the natural history of patients with untreated early-stage HCC, since most with early-stage tumor patients undergoes curative therapy. Survival rates at 3 years is 65% in patients with Child-Pugh A, and single untreated lesion. This proportion increases to 70% at 5 years after radical treatment. In patients included in randomized controlled clinical trials with advanced disease, survival at 1 and 2 years is respectively 72% and 50%. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for HCC. In carefully selected patients, resection and transplantation in fact, allow a 5 years survival from 60% to 70%. Unfortunately most patients in Western countries present with an intermediate or advanced HCC at diagnosis with the consequent inability to use curative treatments. These patients are therefore candidates to palliative therapies that include arterial embolization and chemoembolization and systemic treatments including chemotherapy, immunotherapy and hormonal therapy. Only recently the molecular targeted drug, Sorafenib, has been introduced among the therapeutic options for these patients.