Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer: Quantitative Evaluation at Dual-Energy CT.

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative parameters derived from dual-energy CT for the preoperative diagnosis of metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in participants with breast cancer. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-phase contrast agent-enhanced CT was performed in female participants with breast cancer from June 2015 to December 2017. Quantitative dual-energy CT parameters and morphologic parameters were compared between metastatic and nonmetastatic SLNs. The quantitative parameters were fitted to univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. The diagnostic role of morphologic and quantitative parameters was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves and compared by using the McNemar test. Results This study included 193 female participants (mean age, 47.6 years ± 10.1; age range, 22-79 years). Quantitative dual-energy CT parameters including slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve (λHu) measured at both arterial and venous phases, normalized iodine concentration at both arterial and venous phase, and normalized effective atomic number at the venous phase were higher in metastatic than in nonmetastatic SLNs (P value range, ≤.001 to .031). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that venous phase λHu (in Hounsfield units per kiloelectron-volt) was the best single parameter for the detection of metastatic SLNs. The accuracy of the venous phase λHu for detecting metastatic SLNs was 90.5% on a per-lymph node basis and 87.0% on a per-patient basis. The accuracy and specificity at venous phase λHu was higher than their counterparts in the morphologic parameters (P < .001). Conclusion Dual-energy CT is a complementary means for the preoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes metastases in participants with breast cancer. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: study protocol for a randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: The response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) varies by estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statuses, with responses being lower in ER-positive, HER2-negative tumors as compared with ER-negative, HER2-positive or triple-negative tumors. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is an attractive alternative to NAC for ER-positive, HER2-negative cancer. However, a prior trial comparing NET with standard NAC in ER-positive tumor showed that the difference of response was not significant. Studies demonstrated that the mTOR inhibitor everolimus could sensitize breast tumors to endocrine therapy. A pilot open-label, randomized trial has been designed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus NAC in treating postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS: Forty postmenopausal women with non-metastatic ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer with a primary tumor > 2 cm or positive axillary lymph node(s) proved by biopsy will be randomly (1:1) enrolled from Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital to receive neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole for 18 weeks or fluorouracil, epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (FEC) for six cycles before surgery. Primary outcome is the feasibility of the trial. Secondary outcome measures include ultrasound response rate, pathological complete response rate, breast-conserving surgery rate, toxicities, and changes in the percentages of peripheral blood CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, T helper cells, regulatory T cells, and NK cells. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to determine the feasibility, efficacy and tolerability of head-to-head neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus neoadjuvant FEC in treating postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. The trial will provide evidence to assess the feasibility of a future multicenter, randomized controlled trial, and will provide valuable clinical data of the immunoregulatory effect of everolimus in breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registry, ID: NCT02742051 . Registered on 7 April 2016.

Safety study of axillary reverse mapping in the surgical treatment for breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: With the purpose of minimizing arm lymphedema after axillary staging surgeries in breast cancer patients, the axillary reverse mapping (ARM) technique has been developed to identify and preserve arm drainage system during axillary surgery. This study aimed to clarify risk factors for metastasis in arm lymphatic drainage system in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary nodes. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients who underwent successful both sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) and ARM from October 2009 to August 2010 were enrolled in this study. Radioactive tracer was used for SLN localization and blue dye was used for ARM. All of the identified SLNs and ARM nodes were sent for pathological assessment. RESULTS: ARM nodes metastasis occured in 6 of 69 patients. Age, pathological tumor size (pT) and pathological lymph node status (pN) were not associated with ARM nodes metastasis (P > 0.01). Interestingly, in these 6 patients, all metastatic ARM nodes coincided with SLN-ARM nodes (hot SLN and blue ARM node were the same lymph node). In 50 of 69 patients whose ARM nodes did not coincided with SLNs, all ARM nodes were negative, even in 12 patients with metastatic SLNs. CONCLUSION: Crossover between breast and ipsilateral arm lymphatic drainage system contributes for ipsilateral arm lymph node metastasis. When ARM and SLNB are simultaneously performed in a patient, selectively preservation of the ARM nodes that do not coincided with SLNs would be safe, even if the SLNs are positive. Pathological lymph node status does not account for the occurrence of metastasis in ARM nodes. ARM nodes could be preserved safely, independent of the pathological lymph node status.

Assessing second echelon lymph nodes during sentinel lymph node biopsy: can we have more accurate axillary treatment for breast cancer patients?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard treatment for breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla. For patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was required. However, approximately a half of the SLNs-positive patients were found to have clear axillary lymph nodes after ALND, indicating that they had received unnecessary ALND without therapeutic benefit. Therefore, we propose a hypothesis for solution of this clinical problem. We defined the second echelon lymph nodes (SELNs) as those nodes receiving lymphatic drainage directly from the SLNs. For patients with positive-SLNs, SELNs can be biopsy and assessed. If SELNs are negative, no more ALND was needed in these patients even if their SLNs are positive. If our hypothesis were confirmed to be true, we can tailored our axillary treatment to more breast cancer patients, avoiding unnecessary ALND and its complications.