Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SIB-VMAT technique) to dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for localized prostate cancer: a dose-escalation trial (DESTROY-4).

PURPOSE: DESTROY-4 (DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY OF STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY) was a Phase I trial aimed to evaluate the safety and the feasibility of escalating doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on MRI-defined Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion (DIL) in low- and intermediate-risk pCa patients using a simultaneous integrated boost-volumetric arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) technique. METHODS: Eligible patients included those with low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma (NCCN risk classes) and an International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) ≤ 15. No restriction about DIL and prostate volumes was set. Pretreatment preparation required an enema and the placement of intraprostatic gold fiducials. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions. For the first three patients, the DIL radiation dose was set at 8 Gy per fraction up to a total dose of 40 Gy (PTV1) and was gradually increased in succeeding cohorts to total doses of 42.5 Gy, 45.0 Gy, 47.5 Gy, and finally, 50.0 Gy, while keeping the prescription of 35 Gy/7 Gy per fraction for the entire prostate gland. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurring within 90 days of follow-up (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events scale 4.0). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires at defined intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 75 (range, 58-89) years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 26.3 months (8.9-84 months). 66.7% of patients were classified as intermediate-risk groups, while the others were low-risk groups, according to the NCCN guidelines. Enrolled patients were treated as follows: 8 patients (40 Gy), 5 patients (42.5 Gy), 4 patients (45 Gy), 4 patients (47.5 Gy), and 3 patients (50 Gy). No severe acute toxicities were observed. G1 and G2 acute GU toxicities occurred in 4 (16%) and 3 patients (12.5%), respectively. Two patients (8.3%) and 3 patients (12.5%) experienced G1 and G2 GI toxicities, respectively. Since no DLTs were observed, 50 Gy in five fractions was considered the MTD. The median nadir PSA was 0.20 ng/mL. A slight improvement in QoL values was registered after the treatment. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the feasibility and safety of a total SIB-VMAT dose of 35 Gy on the whole gland and 50 Gy on DIL in 5 fractions daily administered in a well-selected low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma population. A phase II study is ongoing to confirm the tolerability of the schedule and assess the efficacy.

Skin toxicity following radiotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma: is anthocyanin supplementation beneficial?

BACKGROUND: The EU-supported ATHENA project stems from a previous study suggesting that moderate wine consumption reduced the side-effects of radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer patients, an effect possibly due to non-alcoholic anthocyanin fractions of wine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of anthocyanins on RT skin side effects in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Patients were assigned to an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) either for three or five weeks, then randomized to receive three times a day a water-soluble anthocyanin (125 mg)-rich extract of corn cob or a placebo. Supplementation started one week before till the end of RT. Skin characteristics were detected by a standardized, non-invasive Cutometer® dual-MPA580, providing quantitative indices of skin maximal distensibility (R0), elasticity (R2, R5, R7) and viscoelasticity (R6); a Mexameter® MX18 probe evaluated the skin erythema (Er) and melanin (M). Measures were performed before (T0), at the end of RT and of supplementation (T1), and 1, 6 and 12 months after RT (T2-T4). Acute and late skin toxicity were scored according to the RTOG/EORTG scale. Selected biomarkers were measured at T0 and T1. RESULTS: 193 patients previously assigned to 3- or 5-week RT schedules were randomized to either anthocyanin (97) or placebo (96) supplementation. RT induced changes in skin parameters: R0, R2, R5 and R7 decreased, while R6 increased; the changes in R0 and R6 continued in the same direction up to one year, while the others recovered towards basal values; Er and M peaked at T1 and T2, respectively, and returned to basal values at T4. Comparable skin changes were apparent in anthocyanin and placebo groups. A moderate RT-induced increase in total and HDL cholesterol and triglycerides was prevented by anthocyanins. CONCLUSIONS: Anthocyanin supplementation did not prevent RT-induced local skin toxicity. The supplementation was well tolerated and safe.

Radiotherapy of Prostate Carcinoma: A Comparison of the Predictive Role of EAU Versus NCCN Risk Stratification Systems.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the predictive efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association of Urology (EAU) risk stratification systems in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One-thousand-nine-hundred-nine patients treated with definitive (1,074), adjuvant (381), and salvage radiotherapy (454) were analysed. RESULTS: Both systems significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival, and disease-free-survival, while only the NCCN system correlated with local-control in the definitive radiotherapy group. In the adjuvant setting, both systems failed to predict all outcomes. In the salvage setting, only the NCCN system significantly predicted biochemical-relapse-free-survival, metastasis-free-survival and disease-free-survival. CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms the efficacy of both systems in definitive radiotherapy and suggests the utility of the NCCN also in salvage radiotherapy.

Optimized stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy as an alternative to brachytherapy for vaginal cuff boost. A dosimetric study.

We evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique as an alternative to high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in the treatment of vaginal cuff in postoperative endometrial cancer. CT scans of 8 patients were used in this study. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the 0.5 cm tissue around the applicator (then subtracting the applicator). Total dose was 30Gy delivered in 5 fractions. In HDR-BT, dose was prescribed at a distance of 0.5 cm from the surface applicator. For VMAT irradiation, a planning target volume (PTV) was obtained from CTV by an expansion of 3 mm. Two VMAT plans were generated using a full arc rotation. The first plan was optimized with an anatomy-based optimization module (PO-VMAT) using a 1mm multileaf collimator beam margin to enhance dose heterogeneity and dose fallout outside the target. The second plan was generated with a full-inverse planning module (FI-VMAT). Conformity (CI100, CI50, CI25), gradient (GI) indexes, and integral doses were calculated. To account for various dose heterogeneity distributions we calculated the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) using the Niemerko model. A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance followed by Dunn's-type multiple comparisons was performed. Dose distributions were more heterogeneous with HDR-BT: Dmean was 144.2% of prescription dose for CTV in HDR-BT and 118.5 and 108.6% for PTV in PO-VMAT and FI-VMAT, respectively. The mean values of EUD for CTV were 136.9%, 130.0 %, and 111.0% of prescription dose in HDR-BT, PO-VMAT, and FI-VMAT plans, respectively. GI indexes were 2.81, 3.41, and 4.14 for HDR-BT, PO-VMAT, and FI-VMAT, respectively. Near-maximal doses (D0.1cc) for rectum and bladder were significantly higher in HDR-BT plans compared to PO-VMAT and FI-VMAT plans (rectum: 131.2% vs112.8% vs 112.0%, respectively; bladder: 129.2% vs 108.7%, and 109.8%, respectively). PO-VMAT plans were able to mimic the HDR-BT dose distribution, showing a successful capability of highly conformal dose distribution, EUD values similar to HDR-BT, and steep dose-gradient outside PTV, then providing a reasonable alternative to brachytherapy.

Hypofractionated Postoperative IMRT in Prostate Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Study.

AIM: To report the outcome of hypofractionated radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) using simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients with PCa at high risk of relapse after RP or diagnosis of biochemical relapse were included. Patients received 62.5 Gy to the prostate bed and 45 Gy to pelvic nodes in 25 fractions. Androgen-suppressive therapy was prescribed based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk categories. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 30 months. Only two patients (1.6%) developed grade 3 or more acute toxicity: one grade 3 skin toxicity (0.8%) and one grade 4 genitourinary toxicity (0.8%). Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was recorded in 24.2% and 17.7% of patients, respectively. Five-year grade 2 or more gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was 1.1% and 7.3%, respectively. Five-year biochemical relapse-free survival was 86.5%. CONCLUSION: After RP, hypofractionated IMRT-SIB demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile and encouraging results in terms of relapse-free survival.

Intensity-modulated extended-field chemoradiation plus simultaneous integrated boost in the pre-operative treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and determine the recommended pre-operative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) dose of extended-field chemoradiation along with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) dose escalation. METHODS: A radiation dose of 40 Gy over 4 weeks, 2 Gy/fraction, was delivered to the tumour and the lymphatic drainage (planning target volume, PTV3), which encompassed a volume larger than standard (common iliac lymphatic area up to its apex, in front of the L3 vertebra), concurrently with chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). Radiation dose was escalated to the pelvis (PTV2) and to the macroscopic disease (PTV1) with the SIB-IMRT strategy. Three dose levels were planned: Level 1 (PTV3: 40/2 Gy; PTV2: 40/2 Gy; PTV1: 45/2.25 Gy), Level 2 (PTV3: 40/2 Gy; PTV2: 45/2.25 Gy; PTV1: 45/2.25 Gy) and Level 3 (PTV3: 40/2 Gy; PTV2: 45/2.25 Gy; PTV1: 50/2.5 Gy). All treatments were delivered in 20 fractions. Patients were treated in cohorts of between three and six per group using a Phase I study design. The recommended dose was exceeded if two of the six patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity within 3 months from treatment. RESULTS: 19 patients [median age: 46 years; The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2: 3, IIB: 10, IIIA-IIIB: 6] were enrolled. Median follow-up was 24 months (9-60 months). The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was gastrointestinal (GI) (diarrhoea, mucous discharge, rectal/abdominal pain). At Levels 1 and 2, only one grade 3 GI toxicity per level was recorded, whereas at Level 3, two grade 3 GI toxicities (diarrhoea, emesis and nausea) were recorded. CONCLUSION: The SIB-IMRT technique was found to be feasible and safe at the recommended doses of 45 Gy to PTV1 and PTV2 and 40 Gy to PTV3 in the pre-operative treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Unfortunately, this complex technique was unable to safely escalate dose beyond levels already achieved with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique given acute GI toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: A Phase I radiotherapy dose-escalation trial with SIB-IMRT technique is proposed in cervical cancer. This complex technique is feasible and safe at the recommended doses.

Concomitant boost plus large-field preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced uterine cervix carcinoma: Phase II clinical trial final results (LARA-CC-1).

OBJECTIVE: To report the Phase II study final results in terms of pathological complete response (pCR) and complications in locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) patients treated with chemoradiation (CT/RT) regimen based on accelerated fractionation, nodal extended fields and adjuvant radical surgery. METHODS: The sample size was quantified according to published data which shows that CT/RT followed by radical surgery in LACC patients provides a pCR rate above 45%. The 2-stage design by Simon was used to test the null hypothesis that the true pCR would improve by above 20%. The chemoradiation regimen was considered active if >24/43 pCRs were recorded. 40 Gy/2 Gy fraction in 4 weeks was delivered to nodal volume extending up to L3 vertebra, concurrently with chemotherapy. 45 Gy in 20 fractions with a concomitant boost strategy was delivered to the macroscopic disease only. RESULTS: 47 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 26 months (3-52 months). Pathological response was assessed in 44/47 patients: 17/44 (38.6%) showed a pCR to treatment, and 9/44 cases (20.5%) showed microscopic disease. Pelvic nodal metastases were documented in 9/44 cases (20.5%). 87.5% of recurrences were extra pelvic. Five patients (11%) developed acute severe gastrointestinal toxicity. The actuarial cumulative 2-year incidence of G ≥ 2 late cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary toxicity was 10.3%, 8.3% and 24.9%, respectively. The 3-year DFS was 77.1%, while the 3-year OS was 80.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the high tolerability and efficacy of this accelerated regimen. However, based on the study design, 45 Gy as a concomitant boost CT/RT delivered by a 3D technique does not seem sufficient to increase pCR rate.

Concomitant boost dose escalation plus large-field preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: results of a phase I study (LARA-CC-1).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the recommended preoperative dose of large-field chemoradiation along with concomitant boost dose escalation on the tumor in locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A radiation dose of 40Gy over four weeks, 2Gy per fraction, was delivered to the tumor and the lymphatic drainage (planning target volume, PTV2), which encompassed a volume larger than standard (upper field border: L3 vertebra), concurrently with chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). Radiation dose was escalated to the macroscopic tumor only (PTV1) with a concomitant boost strategy. Three dose levels were planned: levels 1 (no PTV1 boost), 2 (45/2.25Gy) and 3 (50/2.5Gy). Patients were treated in cohorts of six to twelve per group using a standard phase I study design. The recommended dose was exceeded if >2 of 6 patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS: 32 patients (median age: 50 years; FIGO stage IB2: 4, IIA: 3, IIB: 21, III-IVA: 4) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 18 months (3-49 months). The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was gastrointestinal (diarrhea). Since three DLTs (grade 3 diarrhea, n=2; grade 3 proctitis, n=1), were observed in 4 patients at level 3, the trial was closed and level 2 was judged as the recommended dose. CONCLUSION: Based on the data from this phase I study, 45Gy/2.25Gy to macroscopic tumor and 40Gy/2Gy to lymphatic drainage may be considered the recommended doses.

Capecitabine based postoperative accelerated chemoradiation of pancreatic carcinoma. A dose-escalation study.

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of escalating up to 55 Gy within five weeks, the dose of external beam radiotherapy to the previous tumor site concurrently with a fixed daily dose of capecitabine, in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma were eligible for this study. Capecitabine was administered at a daily dose of 1600 mg/m (2). Regional lymph nodes received a total radiation dose of 45 Gy with 1.8 Gy per fractions. The starting radiation dose to the tumor bed was 50.0 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction, 25 fractions). Escalation was achieved up to a total dose of 55.0 Gy by increasing the fraction size by 0.2 Gy (2.2 Gy/fraction), while keeping the duration of radiotherapy to five weeks (25 fractions). A concomitant boost technique was used. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade>3 hematologic toxicity, grade>2 liver, renal, neurologic, gastrointestinal, or skin toxicity, by RTOG criteria, or any toxicity producing prolonged (> 10 days) radiotherapy interruption. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twelve patients entered the study (median age: 64 years). In the first cohort (six patients), no patient experienced DLT. Similarly in the second cohort, no DLT occurred. All 12 patients completed the planned regimen of therapy. Nine patients experienced grade 1-2 nausea and/or vomiting. Grade 2 hematological toxicity occurred in four patients. The results of our study indicate that a total radiation dose up to 55.0 Gy/5 weeks can be safely administered to the tumor bed, concurrently with capecitabine (1600 mg/m (2)) in patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma.

Preoperative chemoradiation and intra-operative radiotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In recent years, preoperative chemoradiation has received growing interest for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In an attempt to improve resectability and disease control, we used preoperative radiation therapy and concomitant 5-fluorouracil in a combined modality therapy protocol. The aim of the study was to evaluate definitive results in terms of toxicity, response and clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with unresectable (cT4, 19 patients) or resectable (cT3, 9 patients) nonmetastatic pancreatic tumors received radiotherapy (39.6 Gy) plus 5-fluorouracil (continuous infusion, days 1-4 at 1000 mg/m(2)/day). After 4 weeks, patients were evaluated for surgical resection. In 9 resected patients, electron-beam intra-operative radiotherapy (10 Gy) was given before reconstruction. Thereafter, in resected patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed. RESULTS: During chemoradiation, 1 patient (3.6%) developed grade 3 acute gastrointestinal toxicity and 2 patients (7.1%) developed grade 3 hematological toxicity. Three of 19 patients with unresectable tumors had tumor downstaging (15.8%). Two patients showed partial response (response rate, 7.1%; 95% CI, 0.2-25.3) and 4 patients (14.3%) had minimal tumor response. Four patients (14.3%) showed progressive disease after chemoradiation. One postoperative death was recorded. The median survival time was 11.3 months (20.5 and 9.0 months in resected and unresected patients, respectively). Only one local failure was recorded in 8 patients resected with negative margins. CONCLUSIONS: Although the response rate is still low, our preliminary results suggest that preoperative 5-fluorouracil chemoradiation is well tolerated and may result in tumor downstaging. Delivery of intra-operative radiotherapy seems to be associated with a low rate of local recurrences.