Electrogram morphology discriminators in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A comparative evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Morphology algorithms are currently recommended as a standalone discriminator in single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, these proprietary algorithms differ in both design and nominal programming. OBJECTIVE: To compare three different algorithms with nominal versus advanced programming in their ability to discriminate between ventricular (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). METHODS: In nine European centers, VT and SVTs were collected from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic dual- and triple-chamber ICDs via their respective remote monitoring portals. Percentage morphology matches were recorded for selected episodes which were classified as VT or SVT by means of atrioventricular comparison. The sensitivity and related specificity of each manufacturer discriminator was determined at various values of template match percentage from receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 534 episodes were retained for the analysis. In ROC analyses, Abbott Far Field MD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.91; P < .001) and Boston Scientific RhythmID (AUC: 0.95; P < .001) show higher AUC than Medtronic Wavelet (AUC: 0.81; P < .001) when tested for their ability to discriminate VT from SVT. At nominal % match threshold all devices provided high sensitivity in VT identification, (91%, 100%, and 90%, respectively, for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic) but contrasted specificities in SVT discrimination (85%, 41%, and 62%, respectively). Abbott and Medtronic's nominal thresholds were similar to the optimal thresholds. Optimization of the % match threshold improved the Boston Scientific specificity to 79% without compromising the sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Proprietary morphology discriminators show important differences in their ability to discriminate SVT. How much this impact the overall discrimination process remains to be investigated.

Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia following atrial fibrillation ablation.

Atrial tachycardias represent the second front of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. They are frequently encountered during the index ablation for patients with persistent AF and are common following ablation of persistent AF, occurring in half of all patients who have had AF successfully terminated. An atrial tachycardia is rightly seen as a failure of AF ablation, as these tachycardias are poorly tolerated by patients. This article describes a simple, practical approach to diagnosis and ablation of these atrial tachycardias.

Remote implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring in a Brugada syndrome population.

AIMS: The diagnosis of Brugada syndrome (BS) is typically made in a young and otherwise healthy population. In patients with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), the only currently recommended therapy is an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), but these are not without complications. We investigated whether remote ICD monitoring could simplify follow-up and detect potential complications in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five consecutive patients (26 males, 44 +/- 11 years) implanted with an ICD for BS with a remote monitoring ['Home Monitoring' (HM), Biotronik, Germany] system were prospectively enrolled in this study. They were matched for age, sex, and follow-up duration with 35 BS patients implanted with an ICD without this capability. During a mean follow-up of 33 +/- 17 months, the number of cardiology consultations was significantly lower in the HM group (3 +/- 2 vs. 7 +/- 3; P < 0.001). Inappropriate shock(s) [IS(s)] occurred in three patients (8.5%) in the HM group vs. six (17%) in the control group (P = NS). Ten patients in the HM group had a median of four alerts ('ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation detection' in all patients, 'shock' in three, 'ineffective shock' in two patients with shock on noise, 'extreme ventricular pacing impedance' in one patient due to lead failure, and 'deactivated therapy' in two patients with lead failure before replacement). In 5 of these 10 patients, prompt reprogramming of the ICD may have prevented IS(s). CONCLUSION: Remote ICD monitoring in patients with BS decreases outpatient consultations and may help prevent ISs.