Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nucl Med ; 59(8): 1234-1242, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29674421

RESUMEN

We have developed the 16F12 mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb), which targets the Müllerian-inhibiting substance receptor, type II (MISRII), expressed by ovarian tumors. Here, we assessed in preclinical models the possibility of using radiolabeled 16F12 in a theranostic approach for small-volume ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis, such as after cytoreductive surgery. Methods: DOTA-, DTPA- or deferoxamine mesylate-conjugated 16F12 mAb was radiolabeled with ß-particle (177Lu) or α-particle (213Bi) emitters for therapeutic use and with 89Zr for PET imaging. On the 13th postxenograft day, mice bearing intraperitoneal MISRII-positive AN3CA endometrial carcinoma cell xenografts were treated by conventional intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy (IP-RIT) with 10 MBq of 177Lu-16F12 or 12.9 MBq of 213Bi-16F12 or by brief intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy (BIP-RIT) using 50 MBq of 177Lu-16F12 or 37 MBq of 213Bi-16F12. For BIP-RIT, 30 min after injection of the radiolabeled mAbs, the peritoneal cavity was washed to remove the unbound radioactivity. The biodistribution of 177Lu- and 213Bi-16F12 mAbs was determined and then used for dose assessment. Hematologic toxicity was also monitored. Results: The 16F12 mAb was satisfactorily radiolabeled for both therapy and imaging. IP-RIT with 177Lu-16F12 was slightly more efficient in delaying tumor growth than IP-RIT with 213Bi-16F12. Conversely, 213Bi-16F12 was more efficient than 177Lu-16F12 in BIP-RIT. The biodistribution analysis showed that the tumor-to-blood uptake ratio was significantly higher with BIP-RIT than with IP-RIT for both 213Bi- and 177Lu-16F12. Hematologic toxicity was more pronounced with 177Lu-16F12 than with 213Bi-16F12. SPECT/CT images (after BIP-RIT with 177Lu-16F12) and PET/CT images (after injection of 89Zr-16F12 in the tail vein) showed focal uptake at the tumor site. Conclusion: Radiolabeled 16F12 could represent a new theranostic tool for small-volume ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis. Specifically, 213Bi-16F12-based BIP-RIT could be proposed to selected patients as an alternative adjuvant treatment immediately after cytoreductive surgery. An anti-MISRII mAb is currently being used in a first-in-human study, thus making radiolabeled anti-MISRII mAbs a realistic theranostic option for the clinic.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/radioterapia , Receptores de Péptidos/inmunología , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Transformadores beta/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacocinética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Deferoxamina/química , Femenino , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 1 Anillo/química , Humanos , Marcaje Isotópico , Ratones , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Ácido Pentético/química , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radioquímica , Distribución Tisular
2.
Bull Cancer ; 104(5): 407-416, 2017 May.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28477870

RESUMEN

Portal vein embolization consists of occluding a part of the portal venous system in order to achieve the hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver segments. This technique is used during the preoperative period of major liver resection when the future remnant liver (FRL) volume is insufficient, exposing to postoperative liver failure, main cause of death after major hepatectomy. Portal vein embolization indication depends on the FRL, commonly assessed by its volume. Nowadays, FRL function evaluation seems more relevant and can be measured by 99mTc labelled mebrofenin scintigraphy. Portal vein embolization procedure is mostly performed with percutaneous trans-hepatic access by using ultrasonography guidance and consists of embolic agent injection, such as cyanoacrylate, in the targeted portal vein branches with fluoroscopic guidance. It is a safe and well-tolerated technique, with extremely low morbi-mortality. Portal vein embolization leads to sufficient FRL hypertrophy in about 80% of patients, allowing them to undergo surgery from which they were initially rejected. The two main reasons of non-resection are tumor progression (≈15% of cases) and FRL insufficient hypertrophy (≈5% of cases). When portal vein embolization is not enough to obtain adequate FRL regeneration, hepatic vein embolization may potentiate its effect (liver venous deprivation technique).


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Vena Porta , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Compuestos de Anilina , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cianoacrilatos/administración & dosificación , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Glicina , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Hipertrofia/etiología , Iminoácidos , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/patología , Fallo Hepático/mortalidad , Fallo Hepático/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hepáticas/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Regeneración Hepática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Organotecnecio
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA