Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Heart Rhythm ; 19(1): 90-99, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34536590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) represent a critical issue with regard to sports eligibility assessment in athletes. The ideal diagnostic evaluation of competitive and leisure-time athletes with complex VAs has not been clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical implications of invasive electrophysiological assessments and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) among athletes with VAs. METHODS: We evaluated 227 consecutive athletes who presented to our institutions after being disqualified from participating in sports because of VAs. After noninvasive tests, electrophysiological study (EPS), electroanatomic mapping (EAM), and EAM- or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-guided EMB was performed, following a prespecified protocol. Sports eligibility status was redefined at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: From our sample, 188 athletes (82.8%) underwent EAM and EPS, and 42 (15.2%) underwent EMB. A diagnosis of heart disease could be formulated in 30% of the study population (67/227; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.36) after noninvasive tests; in 37% (83/227; 95% CI 31%-43%) after EPS and EAM; and in 45% (102/227; 95% CI 39%-51%) after EMB. In the subset of athletes undergoing EMB, invasive diagnostic workup allowed diagnostic reclassification of half of the athletes (n = 21 [50%]). Reclassification was particularly common among subjects without definitive findings after noninvasive evaluation (n = 23; 87% reclassified). History of syncope, abnormal echocardiogram, presence of late gadolinium enhancement, and abnormal EAM were linked to sports ineligibility at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive invasive workup provided additional diagnostic elements and could improve the sports eligibility assessment of athletes presenting with VAs. The extensive invasive evaluation presented could be especially helpful when noninvasive tests show unclear findings.


Asunto(s)
Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/diagnóstico , Atletas , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/métodos , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Adulto , Displasia Ventricular Derecha Arritmogénica/fisiopatología , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatología
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 7(11)2018 05 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29789334

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have systematically evaluated fluoroscopy data of electrophysiological and device implantation procedures. Aims of this study were to quantify ionizing radiation exposure for electrophysiological/device implantation procedures in a large series of patients and to analyze the x-ray exposure trend over years and radiation exposure in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation considering different technical aspects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all electrophysiological/device implantation procedures performed during the past 7 years in a modern, large-volume laboratory. We reported complete fluoroscopy data on 8150 electrophysiological/device implantation procedures (6095 electrophysiological and 2055 device implantation procedures); for each type of procedure, effective dose and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality were calculated. Over the 7-year period, we observed a significant trend reduction in fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and effective dose for all electrophysiological procedures (P<0.001) and a not statistically significant trend reduction for device implantation procedures. Analyzing 2416 atrial fibrillation ablations, we observed a significant variability of fluoroscopy time, dose area product and effective dose among 7 different experienced operators (P<0.0001) and a significant reduction of fluoroscopy use over time (P<0.0001) for all of them. Considering atrial fibrillation ablation techniques, fluoroscopy time was not different (P = 0.74) for radiofrequency catheter ablation in comparison with cryoablation, though cryoablation was still associated with higher dose area product and effective dose values (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological procedures involve a nonnegligible x-ray use, leading to an increased risk of malignancy. Awareness of radiation-related risk, together with technological advances, can successfully optimize fluoroscopy use.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Exposición Profesional , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral , Tempo Operativo , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA