In vitro propagation of Saussurea obvallata (DC.) Edgew.--an endangered ethnoreligious medicinal herb of Himalaya.

This is the first report of a micropropagation protocol for Saussurea obvallata (DC.) Edgew. (Asteraceae), a rare, threatened and near-endemic medicinal herb of the Indian Himalayan region. Multiple shoots were formed from epicotyle explants on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 1.0 microM kinetin and 0.25 microM alpha-naphthaleneacetic acid. A maximum of five shoots were obtained from one explant in a 75-day culture period. The effect of subsequent subcultures on shoot formation was also studied. After 100% in vitro rooting was obtained in half-strength MS supplemented with 2.5 microM indole-3-butyric acid, the plantlets were transferred to ex vitro conditions. Following a 15-day in vitro rooting period and 12 days of ex vitro acclimatization, 66.7% of the plantlets had established in the field. Application of this protocol has the potential to substantially reduce the pressure on natural populations.

Randomised comparison of ciprofloxacin suspension and pivmecillinam for childhood shigellosis.

BACKGROUND: Infections caused by multiply resistant Shigella species are a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality in Third World countries. The fluoroquinolone agent ciprofloxacin is active in vitro against these strains of bacteria, but has not been routinely used to treat acute childhood infections because of concern that quinolones may cause arthropathy in children. We undertook a randomised double-blind study to test the effects of ciprofloxacin treatment in children with shigella dysentery. METHODS: We compared the efficacy and toxic effects of ciprofloxacin suspension (10 mg/kg every 12 h for 5 days, maximum individual dose 500 mg) with those of pivmecillinam tablets (15-20 mg/kg every 8 h for 5 days, maximum individual dose 300 mg). We enrolled 143 children aged 2-15 years with dysentery of 72 h or less duration. Patients stayed in hospital for 6 days, and were followed up 7, 30, and 180 days after hospital discharge. Joint symptoms and function were assessed daily for 6 days. Clinical success was defined as the absence of frank dysentery on day 3, and on day 5 no bloody-mucoid stools, one or no watery stool, six or fewer total stools, and no fever. If no shigella were isolated from faecal samples on day 3 or thereafter, treatment was judged bacteriologically successful. FINDINGS: 13 patients were excluded since they did not meet eligibility criteria; 10 withdrew before day 5. Thus 120 patients (60 in each group) completed the study. Treatment was clinically successful in 48 (80%) of 60 patients who received ciprofloxacin and in 39 (65%) of 60 patients who received pivmecillinam (p=0.10). Treatment was bacteriologically successful in all of the patients receiving ciprofloxacin, and in 54 (90%) of the patients receiving pivmecillinam (p=0.03). Joint pain after treatment began in 13 (18%) of 71 patients who received ciprofloxacin and 16 (22%) of 72 patients who received pivmecillinam (p>0.2), and no patient had signs of arthritis. INTERPRETATION: In our trial, ciprofloxacin suspension and pivmecillinam had the same clinical efficacy. Ciprofloxacin had greater bacteriological efficacy and was not associated with the development of arthropathy. We conclude that ciprofloxacin is an effective and safe drug for use in multiply resistant childhood shigellosis.

Treatment of shigellosis: V. Comparison of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of shigellosis is currently limited by the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains of Shigella. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of shigellosis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Diarrhea treatment center in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PATIENTS: 70 men with shigellosis that had lasted 72 hours or less. INTERVENTIONS: Patients stayed in the hospital for 6 days. Thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive 500 mg of azithromycin on study day 1, followed by 250 mg once daily for 4 days; 36 patients were assigned to receive 500 mg of ciprofloxacin every 12 hours for 5 days. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical treatment failure was considered to have occurred if frank dysentery persisted for 72 hours after therapy began or if on study day 5 a patient had more than six stools, had any bloody-mucoid stools, had more than one watery stool, or had an oral body temperature exceeding 37.8 degrees C. Bacteriologic treatment failure was considered to have occurred if Shigella strains could be isolated from a stool sample after study day 2. Therapy was considered either clinically or bacteriologically successful in patients who completed therapy and did not meet criteria for failure. RESULTS: Therapy was clinically successful in 28 (82%) patients who received azithromycin and 32 (89%) patients who received ciprofloxacin (difference, -7% [95% Cl, -23% to 10%]). Therapy was bacteriologically successful in 32 (94%) patients receiving azithromycin and 36 (100%) patients receiving ciprofloxacin (difference, -6% [Cl, -14% to 2%]). Peak serum concentrations of azithromycin were equal to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting Shigella strains, whereas serum concentrations of ciprofloxacin were 28 times the MIC. Stool concentrations of both drugs were more than 200 times the MIC. CONCLUSION: Azithromycin is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe shigellosis caused by multidrug-resistant Shigella strains.

Randomised controlled comparison of single-dose ciprofloxacin and doxycycline for cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae 01 or 0139.

BACKGROUND: Effective antimicrobial therapy can reduce the duration and volume of cholera diarrhoea by half. However, such treatment is currently limited by Vibrio cholerae resistance to the drugs commonly prescribed for cholera, and by the difficulties involved in the administration of multi-drug doses under field conditions. Because of its favourable pharmacokinetics we thought it likely that single-dose ciprofloxacin would be effective in the treatment of cholera. METHODS: In this double-blind study treatment was either a single 1 g oral dose of ciprofloxacin plus doxycycline placebo, or a single 300 mg oral dose of doxycycline plus ciprofloxacine placebo. 130 moderately or severely dehydrated men infected with V cholerae 01 and 130 infected with V cholerae 0139 were randomly assigned treatment. Patients stayed in hospital for 5 days. We measured fluid intake and stool volume every 6 h, and a sample of stool for culture was obtained daily. The primary outcome measures were clinical success--the cessation of watery stool within 48 h; and bacteriological success--absence of V cholerae from cultures of stool after study day 2. FINDINGS: Among patients infected with V cholerae 01, treatment was clinically successful in 62 (94%) of 66 patients who received ciprofloxacin and in 47 (73%) of 64 who receive doxycycline (difference 21% [95% Cl 8-33]); the corresponding proportions with bacteriological success were 63 (95%) and 44 (69%) (27% [14-39]). Among patients infected with V cholerae 0139, treatment was clinically successful in 54 (92%) of 59 patients who received ciprofloxacin and in 65 (92%) of 71 who received doxycycline (< 1% [-9 to 9]), and bacteriologically successful in 58 (98%) and 56 (79%), respectively (19% [9-30]). Total volume of watery stool did not differ significantly between ciprofloxacin-group and doxycycline-group patients infected with either V cholerae 01 or 0139. All but one of the V cholerae 01 and all of the 0139 isolates were susceptible in vitro to doxycycline, whereas 48 (37%) of the V cholerae 01 isolates and none of the 0139 isolates were resistant to tetracycline. Treatment clinically failed in 14 (52%) of 27 doxycycline-treated patients infected with a tetracycline-resistant V cholerae 01 strain, compared with three (8%) of 37 patients infected with a tetracycline-susceptible strain (44% [23-65]). INTERPRETATION: Single-dose ciprofloxacin is effective in the treatment of cholera caused by V cholerae 01 or 0139 and is better than single-dose doxycycline in the eradication of V cholerae from stool. Single-dose ciprofloxacin may also be the preferred treatment in areas where tetracycline-resistant V cholerae are common. In V cholerae, in-vitro doxycycline susceptibilities are not a useful indicator of the in-vivo efficacy of the drug.