Survival of breast cancer patients with meningeal carcinomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading nonhematologic cause of meningeal carcinomatosis (MC). The aim of this study was to report the outcome of patients diagnosed with breast cancer MC and treated in single institution by a high-dose intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) regimen. METHODS: Ninety-one patients were diagnosed with breast cancer MC from 2000 to 2007. Intrathecal treatment was MTX 15 mg/day (days 1-5), hydrocortisone acetate (day 1) and oral folinic acid (days 1-5), repeated every 2 weeks. Patients and tumor characteristics were associated with the early clinical and biological outcome and with the overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median survival was 4.5 months (range 0-53). In multivariate analysis, adverse prognostic factors at diagnosis were performance status >2 [P = 0.006, response rate (RR) = 0.33 (0.15-0.71)], more than three chemotherapy regimens before MC diagnosis [P = 0.03, RR = 0.40 (0.19-0.93)], negative hormone receptor status [P = 0.02, RR = 0.4 (0.19-0.90)] and high Cyfra 21-1 level [P = 0.048, RR = (0.09-0.99)]. Clinical progression after one cycle and biological response after two cycles were independently associated with OS [P < 0.001, RR = 0.09 (0.02-0.37) and P = 0.003, RR = 3.6 (1.5-8.5), respectively]. We propose a prognostic score in order to define three distinct groups of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: MC presents a poor prognosis, but 1-year survival rate was 25%. This score may become a useful tool for treatment decision and clinical trials.

Efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine and fluorouracil combination as first-line chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer: results of a phase II study using a sequential group method.

PURPOSE: To assess the antitumor efficacy and safety profile of the combination of Fluorouracil (5FU) and vinorelbine given as first-line therapy to patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As defined in the seven consecutive steps of a phase II group sequential design, 63 patients received 5FU 750 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days as a continuous infusion and vinorelbine 30 mg/ m2 on days 1 and 5 as a short intravenous (I/V) infusion every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-one of 63 patients achieved an objective response, which allowed us to discontinue the study and reject a response rate less than 50% with a statistical power of 90%. The unbiased estimate of the response rate was 61.6%. Response rate did not differ significantly according to the following: (1) type of prior adjuvant therapy (none, n = 23; without anthracycline, n = 6; with anthracyline, n = 34); (2) site of metastatic disease; and (3) number of metastatic sites. The median time to progression was 8.4 months. The median response duration was 12.3 months, and the median duration of complete response (CR), from the first assessment of CR, was 7.3 months. The median overall survival time was 23 months (28.1 months for patients with a CR). The main toxicities (grades 3 and 4) were neutropenia (90% of patients), infection (12.7%), mucositis (37%), and constipation (9.5%). Nevertheless, treatment could be given on an outpatient basis to the majority of patients, and the median relative dose-intensity was 86%. CONCLUSION: This phase II study, which used a group-sequential design, shows that the combination of 5FU and vinorelbine is an active and tolerable regimen for the treatment of first metastatic progression of breast cancer. It provides an alternative regimen for patients who have previously received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy or in whom anthracyclines cannot be used.

First-line protracted venous infusion fluorouracil with CisDDP or carboplatin in advanced colorectal cancer.

A total of 55 patients with measurable colorectal metastatic carcinoma were studied to evaluate the impact on toxicity, response, and survival of protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day with Cis-DDP 80 mg/m2 or carboplatin 300 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, 1-hour infusion. Patients received continuous uninterrupted therapy until there were signs or symptoms of toxicity. Both 5-FU and cisplatin were withheld when patients experienced grade II stomatitis and diarrhea, severe nausea or vomiting not controlled by standard antiemetic therapy, and clinically significant hand-foot syndrome. The toxicity was neurological (20% grade 2 and 3) hematological (13% grade 2) and dermatological (11% grade 2). The overall response (CR+PR) was 24% with a median survival of 13 months. The results of our study show that there is no improvement in response rate, response duration or survival compared with historical trials. However, this study does confirm the valuable palliative role of the protracted 5-FU infusion treatment. Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common neoplasms in Western societies, being second only to lung cancer as a cause of death from malignancy. The management of nonmetastatic primary disease in surgical, with adjuvant chemotherapy for those at high risk of relapse. However, for those with metastatic disease at diagnosis or recurrent disease after resection, cytotoxic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice and fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most active cytotoxic agent in this disease, with a response rate of approximately 20%. Efforts to improve the response rate have focused on the use of agents to modulate 5 FU. The Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) study reported by Leichman et al. (1) and a study from the United Kingdom by Hill et al. (2) compared conventional FU to modulated FU and found no improvement in response rate or survival. In the SWOG study, two different schedules of bolus FU and LV were compared with bolus FU alone and to continuous infusion FU administered alone or modulated by LV or PALA. In this study, the results obtained with bolus FU were superior to most of the studies in the literature: The response rate was 26%, and the median survival was 14 months. The high- and low-dose LV and FU groups showed response rates and survival similar to bolus FU alone. However, in 12 previously reported randomized studies comparing FU and LV or FU alone, nine reported that the combination of FU and LV produced significant increases in response rates and two reported significant increase in survival (3, 4). Many of these trials used the dose schedules reported in the SWOG trial. Protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-FU has been shown to have superior efficacy with less toxicity in colorectal cancer when compared to bolus 5-FU and synergy between cisplatin and 5-FU has been demonstrated in vitro. Consequently, we have investigated the efficacy of the combination of bolus cis or carboplatin and PVI 5 FU in 55 patients with advanced colorectal cancer using survival, response rate, symptomatic response, and toxicity as study endpoints.

Meningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast carcinoma. Clinical features, prognostic factors, and results of a high-dose intrathecal methotrexate regimen.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study evaluates the results of a regimen of high-dose intrathecal methotrexate and the prognostic factors for the response in patients with meningeal from breast carcinoma. METHODS: From 1979 to 1994, 68 breast carcinoma patients were diagnosed with meningeal carcinomatosis at a mean age of 52 years. All but two had previous metastatic involvement. The proportion of lobular and ductal carcinomas was balanced. Malignant cells were present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 61 patients, whereas the 7 remaining patients had increased CSF protein associated with computerized tomographic scan evidence of meningeal metastases. From 1989, 41 of the patients received a regimen of high-dose intrathecal methotrexate with systemic folinic acid rescue (HD-MTX+FA): intrathecal MTX, 15 mg daily x 5 days, repeated every 2 weeks, and intrathecal hydrocortisone acetate, 125 mg on Day 1, and folinic acid, 10 mg intramuscularly 12 hours after each MTX injection. Systemic treatment and radiation therapy were usually associated. Patients treated before 1988 received intrathecal MTX in conventional doses (15 mg once a week). RESULTS: Clinical objective response, defined as a neurological improvement for at least one month, was achieved in 17 patients (41%) and stabilization in 14 (34%) treated with the HD-MTX+FA regimen. The response rate was significantly higher compared with that of the group treated with the conventional doses (P = 0.03). Median survival was 14 weeks for patients treated with the HD-MTX+FA regimen, compared with 7 weeks for patients who received conventional doses of MTX (P = 0.01). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was the main toxicity that occurred in 16 16 patients (39%) treated with the HD-MTX+FA regimen, and in 7 patients (33%) treated with conventional doses of MTX. In a univariate analysis, three parameters were singled out as having a favorable prognostic value for response to therapy; controlled systemic disease at diagnosis (P < 0.05), low initial CSF protein level (P < 0.05), and concomitant systemic chemotherapy during intrathecal therapy (P < 0.02). Multivariate analysis was not performed because the sample size was too small. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was retrospective, the intrathecal HD-MTX+FA regimen appears to be a more efficient strategy than conventional doses of MTX to induce neurologic improvement and perhaps better survival. It should be recommended in combination with systemic chemotherapy for selected patients with meningeal carcinomatosis from breast carcinoma who are likely to benefit from intensive therapy, i.e., patients with a CSF protein level less than 5 g/L and in whom systemic disease has been controlled.