Telmisartan plus propranolol improves liver fibrosis and bile duct proliferation in the PSC-like Abcb4-/- mouse model.

BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease leading to cirrhosis and cholangiocellular carcinoma. Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system or the sympathetic nervous system delay liver fibrogenesis in animal models. AIMS: We investigated the antifibrotic potential of telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, and the ß-adrenoceptor blocker propranolol in the PSC-like Abcb4 knockout mouse model. METHODS: Sixty-five Abcb4 (-/-) mice were treated with telmisartan for 3 or 5 months (T) and with telmisartan plus propranolol for 3, 5, or 8 months (TP), or for 2 or 5 months starting with a delay of 3 months (TP delayed). Liver hydroxyproline content, inflammation, fibrosis, and bile duct proliferation were assessed; fibrosis-related molecules were analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. RESULTS: Compared to controls, telmisartan monotherapy had no significant influence on hydroxyproline; however, telmisartan plus propranolol reduced hydroxyproline (TP 3 months, p = 0.008), fibrosis score (TP 3 months and TP 8 months, p = 0.043 and p = 0.008, respectively; TP delayed 8 months, p < 0.0005), bile duct proliferation (TP 8 months and TP delayed 8 months, p = 0.006 and p < 0.0005, respectively), and procollagen α1(I), endothelin-1, TIMP-1 and MMP3 mRNA as well as α-SMA, CK-19, and TIMP-1 protein. CONCLUSIONS: Telmisartan plus propranolol reduces liver fibrosis and bile duct proliferation in the PSC-like Abcb4 (-/-) mouse model, even when started at late stages of fibrosis, and may thus represent a novel therapeutic option for cholestatic liver diseases such as PSC.

Induction of apoptosis and up-regulation of cellular proliferation in oral leukoplakia cell lines inside electric field.

OBJECTIVE: In dentistry, metallic alloys are used for dentures, restorative materials, and orthodontic devices. Electric voltages up to 950 mV may occur between different dental alloys in the oral cavity. This study aimed to investigate physiologic reactions of oral leukoplakia cells in vitro to electric fields. STUDY DESIGN: A human leukoplakia cell line (MSK-LEUK1), cultivated in keratinocyte growth medium (KGM-2) supplemented with growth factors in 5% CO(2) humidified air at 37°C, was exposed to electric field strength of 1-20 V/m for 24 hours in a custom-made pulse chamber. The cells were then analyzed for proliferation with the use of BrdU assay and for apoptosis with the use of TUNEL assay. Findings were assessed with the use of fluorescent microscopy. Ultrastructural changes were studied by transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: Electric field strength of 1-10 V/m led to up-regulation of cell proliferation rate from 10.64% to 44.06% (P = .0001). The apoptotic index increased significantly (P = .0001) from 20.03% at 1 V/m to 46.56% at 10 V/m. Individual cell keratinization was seen in leukoplakia cells treated with 16 V/m. CONCLUSIONS: Oral galvanism induces subcellular changes in oral precancer cells in vitro that closely simulate some of the morphologic features of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in vivo.

Erlotinib and sorafenib in an orthotopic rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The combination of erlotinib with sorafenib is currently being investigated in a phase III RCT. We studied the effect of erlotinib and sorafenib on HCC in a preclinical model. METHODS: The Morris Hepatoma (MH) and HepG2 cells were treated in vitro with sorafenib (1-10 µM) and erlotinib (1-5 µM) and evaluated for tumor cell viability, apoptosis, and target regulation. Antiangiogenic effects were studied by measuring VEGF levels, endothelial cell viability, apoptosis, migration, and the aortic ring assay. In vivo, MH cells were implanted into the liver of syngeneic rats and treated with vehicle, sorafenib 5-10mg/kg, erlotinib 10mg/kg, and respective combinations. RESULTS: In vitro, erlotinib downregulated p-ERK but showed no significant effect on tumor cell viability in MH and HEPG2 cells. Despite a similar target regulation, sorafenib significantly reduced cell viability of HCC cells by induction of apoptosis, in a dose-dependent manner (11 ± 5%; 20 ± 10%; 51 ± 5% for sorafenib 1, 5, 10 µM). No additional effect was observed upon combination with erlotinib. Of note, erlotinib treatment resulted in endothelial cell migration and vascular sprouting of aortic rings through induction of VEGF mRNA and protein levels in endothelial and tumor cells, which was blocked by sorafenib. In vivo, erlotinib had no single agent antitumor activity, raised serum-VEGF levels, and lacked a synergistic effect in combination with sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib had no antitumor effect on HCC in vitro nor in vivo, but induced VEGF, which may reflect a resistance mechanism to erlotinib monotherapy. No improvement of sorafenib efficacy was observed upon combination with erlotinib.

Inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication in vivo by nucleoside analogues and siRNA.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes acute and chronic infections that may result in severe liver diseases. Animal models to study new treatment options in vivo have several drawbacks. Therefore, we were interested to establish a new small animal model in which HBV replication and especially new treatment options can be studied easily. METHODS: Naked DNA of an HBV replication competent vector was transferred via tail vein into NMRI mice. HBV replication was studied in serum and liver of the animals. HBV replication was modulated by treatment through siRNA and nucleoside analogues. RESULTS: Tail vein transfer of a HBV replication competent construct resulted in expression of HBV-specific transcripts in the liver, and up to 10% of hepatocytes became HBc- and HBsAg-positive. HBeAg, HBsAg, and viral DNA could be detected in the serum of the animals, followed by the induction of HBV-specific cellular immune responses. Nucleoside treatment of the mice resulted in reduced polymerase activity in the liver. Additionally, siRNA transfer in the animals led to a significant reduction of HBsAg and/or eventually HBeAg expression, which was dependent on the localization of the complementary sequence in the HBV genome. CONCLUSIONS: We have established a mouse model to study HBV replication and to investigate new and existing treatment approaches in vivo. Interestingly, siRNA seems a promising innovative treatment option to inhibit specifically HBV replication in vivo.