Kidney injury molecule-1 outperforms traditional biomarkers of kidney injury in preclinical biomarker qualification studies.

Kidney toxicity accounts both for the failure of many drug candidates as well as considerable patient morbidity. Whereas histopathology remains the gold standard for nephrotoxicity in animal systems, serum creatinine (SCr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) are the primary options for monitoring kidney dysfunction in humans. The transmembrane tubular protein kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1) was previously reported to be markedly induced in response to renal injury. Owing to the poor sensitivity and specificity of SCr and BUN, we used rat toxicology studies to compare the diagnostic performance of urinary Kim-1 to BUN, SCr and urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) as predictors of kidney tubular damage scored by histopathology. Kim-1 outperforms SCr, BUN and urinary NAG in multiple rat models of kidney injury. Urinary Kim-1 measurements may facilitate sensitive, specific and accurate prediction of human nephrotoxicity in preclinical drug screens. This should enable early identification and elimination of compounds that are potentially nephrotoxic.

Tissue-specific, non-invasive toxicity biomarkers: translation from preclinical safety assessment to clinical safety monitoring.

Limited sensitivity and limited target organ specificity are the major drawbacks for most peripheral clinical pathology parameters traditionally used for monitoring organ integrity both during preclinical toxicological assessment and clinical safety testing of investigational drugs. Several novel toxicity biomarkers have emerged as sensitive tools for detection, monitoring, quantification and prediction of solid organ toxicity. These tissue-specific, non-invasive biomarkers may provide valuable information for decision making during toxicological assessment and may be used for sensitive and specific target organ monitoring during clinical trials. This review critically discusses the opportunities and limitations of these biomarkers with respect to their translation into (first-in-human) clinical trials. A comprehensive overview is provided on serum- and urine-based biomarkers for hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, gonadotoxicity, pancreatic toxicity, vascular toxicity and phospholipidosis including species-specific assay availabilities and sampling regimens. In addition, the current regulatory status is presented and discussed in view of recent changes in regulatory acceptance by health authorities.

Monitoring kidney safety in drug development: emerging technologies and their implications.

Drug-induced kidney injury is a serious and not uncommon adverse event which needs to be considered during drug development. The current standards used to monitor kidney function, such as blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine, are late indicators of kidney injury and thus do not allow for timely intervention before loss of function. Improving the diagnosis and monitoring of kidney damage goes hand-in-hand with the identification of new biomarkers and the development of technologies that enable their sensitive and specific measurements. In order to move beyond restriction to internal company decisions, every entity that demonstrates the qualities of a biomarker must gain acceptance by health authorities if it is to be used for regulatory decision making in preclinical studies and clinical trials. This review focuses on the most promising achievements of new technologies applied to monitoring drug-induced nephrotoxicity (eg, gene expression, imaging, in vitro screening, protein assays) and on the use and implications of peripheral biomarkers such as the urinary protein biomarkers glutathione S-transferase-alpha, N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase, total protein, cystatin C, beta2-microglobulin, KIM-1, lipocalin-2 and serum cystatin C. Finally, the associated regulatory processes for use in clinics are also discussed.

Promises of biomarkers in drug development--a reality check.

Biomarkers have been a buzz word in drug development for the last 5 years. But where do we stand now? This perspective article will demonstrate to which extent biomarkers have impacted drug development and the use of drugs. In particular, the different types of biomarkers, their identification, validation and use in different phases of drug development from drug discovery, to approval, to clinical application will be discussed as well as the state-of-the-art biomarker technologies and promising future methods. The high interest in biomarkers has generated the need for development of new technologies and refinement of existing ones. Besides discussing their perspectives of applications, the present article also illustrates the future of biomarker development in terms of qualification for regulatory use and co-development.