Preventive effect of intravesical ozone supplementation on n-methyl-n-nitrosourea-induced non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in male rats.

Although non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is widely seen in men, most laboratory studies of new intravesical therapies to prevent NMIBC have been conducted on female animals. In addition, ozone (O3) has been shown to be a beneficial agent as an intravesical application in the treatment of various disorders. In the current study, we evaluated the immunohistopathological and oxidative-antioxidative effects of intravesical O3 treatment on n-methyl-n-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced NMIBC. Male Wistar-Albino rats (n=51) were divided into four groups: sham (n=6), O3 only (n=15), MNU only (n=15), and MNU+O3 (n=15). The MNU-only and MNU+O3 groups received MNU, and the O3-only group received saline every other week for 10 weeks. The MNU-only group received 1 ml saline in place of O3 treatment, whereas the O3-only and MNU+O3 groups were treated with 1 ml 25 µg/ml O3 between the 7th and 12th weeks. Rat bladders were collected in the 15th week for immunohistopathology and oxidant-antioxidant quantitation. Oxidant-antioxidant parameters were determined by ELISA. Although all surviving rats in the MNU-only group had preneoplastic (4/11, 36.4%) or neoplastic changes (7/11, 63.6%), a completely normal urothelium was observed in 2 rats (2/12, 16.7%) in the MNU+O3-group (P=0.478). More high-grade lesions were observed in the MNU-only group (4/11, 36.4%) than in the MNU+O3 group (1/12, 8.3%) (P=0.120). All oxidant-antioxidant parameters significantly increased (P<0.05) in the O3-only group compared with the sham group. However, only antioxidant superoxide dismutase was remarkably higher (178.9%, P=0.060) in the MNU+O3 group compared with the MNU-only group. This is the first methodologically and pathologically well-described male rat orthotopic bladder carcinogenesis model with intravesical MNU and administration of O3 in NMIBC.

The role of the bipolar plasmakinetic TURP over 100 g prostate in the elderly patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bipolar plasma kinetic (BP) transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) has been proved to be a safe and effective treatment for benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). However, the role of bipolar TURP on large prostates over 100 g compared with open suprapubic prostatectomy (SP) in elderly patients (>65 years) has not ever been studied before. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients' medical records between 2007 and 2012 was performed. A total of 102 patients who underwent SP (n = 44) or BP-TURP [Gyrus Plasma Kinetic™ (Gyrus ACMI, USA)] (n = 58) for obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPE were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were age ≥65 years, prostate volume ≥100 g, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥18, and peak urinary flow rate (PFR) ≤15 ml/s. Exclusion criteria were urethral stricture, known history of neurogenic bladder due to neural disorders, previous prostate and/or urethral surgery, bladder stone, bladder cancer, and known prostate cancer. Operation time, hospitalization, and catheter removal times were noted. Patients were re-evaluated at postoperative 3rd and 12th months. Evaluated parameters were IPSS, quality of life (QoL), simplified International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), PFR, post-voiding residual urinary volume (PVR). Statistical significance was set at 0.05 and all tests were two-tailed. RESULTS: Preoperative IPSS, PVR, IIEF-5, QoL, and prostate volume were not statistically significantly different between two groups except for PFR. Mean follow-up for BP-TURP and SP groups were 15.0 ± 5.8 (R: 11-38), 22.1 ± 11.2 (R: 11-59) months, respectively (p < 0.001). When compared with SP, mean catheter removal time (p < 0.001) and median hospitalization time (p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in BP-TURP group. However, mean operative time was significantly (p < 0.001) longer than SP group and also median resected material weight was significantly lower in the BP-TURP group (p < 0.001). IPSS, QoL, PFR, PVR, and IIEF-5 scores at postoperative 3rd and 12th month were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). Thirty-three patients had perioperative complications according to the modified Clavien-Dindo system. Thirteen patients (22.4 %) in BP-TURP group and 20 patients (45.4 %) in SP group had complications. In 12th month follow-up visit, four patients presented with urethral stricture, three patients (5.1 %) were in BP-TURP group, and one patient (2.3 %) in SP group (p = 0.455). All strictures were treated with internal urethrotomy. CONCLUSIONS: BP-TURP is a safe and highly effective treatment modality for BPE in the elderly patients with prostate glands over 100 g. Clinical efficacy and postoperative 12th month's results were similar to SP. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed in order to confirm our findings.

Size of the transrectal ultrasound probe makes no difference in pain perception during TRUS-Bx under adequate local anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In the great majority of the cases, transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is the definitive step in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (CaP). Although this procedure is well tolerated by most patients, it can result in considerable discomfort that can effectively be overcome with local injection anesthesia. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the size (i.e., circumference) of the transrectal probe on pain during TRUS-Bx. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy eligible patients who had elevated total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) were included in this study. Patients (pts.) were divided into three TRUS-Bx groups; Group I: 60 pts. underwent TRUS-Bx with newer B-K Type 8808 probe (circumference 58 mm) under injectable periprostatic anesthesia, Group II: 60 pts. underwent TRUS-Bx with B-K Type 8551 probe (circumference 74 mm) under injectable periprostatic anesthesia, and Group III: 50 pts. underwent TRUS-Bx with B-K Type 8551 probe (circumference 74 mm) without local anesthesia. Periprostatic injection anesthesia was performed with 10 cc, 1% lidocaine (5 cc on each side) 10 min before TRUS-Bx. Pain was assessed using a 10-point modified visual analog scale (VAS) 15 min after the biopsy procedure. RESULTS: Three groups were homogeneous with respect to age and tPSA, and no statistically significant difference was observed in terms of mean biopsy duration between the 3 groups. Most of the patients experienced no pain to slight pain in Groups I and II, but 66% of the patients had more than moderate pain (VAS ≥ 5) in Group III with mean VAS score statistically higher than the other two groups (Group I vs. III, P = 0.0001; Group II vs. III, P = 0.0001). Mean VAS score was not statistically different between Group I and II (P = 0.126). No statistically significant difference in VAS pain perception was observed between different age categories within the Group I, II, and III. CONCLUSION: In the absence of injectable local anesthesia, larger probe (74 mm) results in much higher VAS pain perception than same size and smaller (58 mm) probe used under injectable local anesthesia. However, under injectable local anesthesia, the size (circumference) of the transrectal probe (58 mm vs. 74 mm) does not result in any different pain perception during TRUS-Bx.

Combined "periprostatic and periapical" local anesthesia is not superior to "periprostatic" anesthesia alone in reducing pain during Tru-Cut prostate biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, in a prospective study, the benefit of adding local periapical prostatic anesthesia to routine periprostatic infiltration to the prostate-seminal vesicle junction in a randomized fashion. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy is the reference standard in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Although well tolerated by most patients, it can be associated with discomfort. METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive evaluable patients with an elevated total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) level, increased tPSA velocity, and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings were enrolled. The patients were randomized into two groups. Group 1 received periprostatic infiltration of 6 mL 1% lidocaine. Group 2 received periprostatic and apical infiltration: 4 mL 1% lidocaine at the prostate-seminal vesicle junction and 2-mL infiltration at the prostatic apex 15 minutes before transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Pain was assessed using a 10-point modified visual analog scale. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 63.7 +/- 1.2 years and 64.2 +/- 1.1 years, the mean tPSA level was 12.1 +/- 1.5 ng/mL and 13.6 +/- 2.7 ng/mL, the mean biopsy duration was 6.2 +/- 2.5 minutes and 6.1 +/- 2.2 minutes, and the mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.26 +/- 0.1 and 1.23 +/- 0.1 for groups 1 and 2, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed with respect to age, tPSA level, mean biopsy duration, or pain score between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Periprostatic lidocaine infiltration provides local anesthesia that results in improved visual analog scale pain scores. Additional apical infiltration did not improve patient discomfort further. However, comparative evidence has indicated that increasing the time elapsed between the anesthetic infiltration and the biopsy procedure may further improve pain control.