M.O.I.S.T. Concept for the Local Therapy of Chronic Wounds: An International Update.

Chronic wounds remain a significant clinical challenge both for those affected and for healthcare systems. The treatment is often comprised and complex. All patients should receive wound care that is integrated into a holistic approach involving local management that addresses the underlying etiology and provides for gold standard therapy to support healing, avoid complications and be more cost effective. There have been significant advances in medicine over the last few decades. The development of new technologies and therapeutics for the local treatment of wounds is also constantly increasing. To help standardize clinical practice with regard to the multitude of wound products, the M.O.I.S.T. concept was developed by a multidisciplinary expert group. The M stands for moisture balance, O for oxygen balance, I for infection control, S for supporting strategies, and T for tissue management. Since the M.O.I.S.T. concept, which originated in the German-speaking countries, is now intended to provide healthcare professionals with an adapted instrument to be used in clinical practice, and a recent update to the concept has been undertaken by a group of interdisciplinary experts to align it with international standards. The M.O.I.S.T. concept can now be used internationally both as an educational tool and for the practical implementation of modern local treatment concepts for patients with chronic wounds and can also be used in routine clinical practice.

Concurrent optical and magnetic stimulation therapy in patients with lower extremity hard-to-heal wounds.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of patients with hard-to-heal wounds represents a major multidisciplinary challenge. Therefore, the development and clinical validation of new technologies remains extremely important. The novel application of concurrent optical and magnetic stimulation (COMS) offers a promising noninvasive approach to support physiological wound healing processes, especially in hard-to-heal wounds. METHOD: In a multicentre, prospective, comparative, clinical trial, patients with hard-to-heal wounds on lower extremities of different aetiologies were treated with COMS as an adjunct to standard of care (SOC). The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints were wound healing, pain and wound-specific quality of life (Wound-QoL). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study (intention to treat population (ITTP), n=40). Of these patients, 37 were included in the analysis of the primary endpoint (primary endpoint population, (PEP), n=37). A further subgroup of 30 patients was included in the analysis of the secondary endpoint (secondary endpoint population (SEP), n=30). Finally, the SEP was stratified regarding patients' responsiveness to SOC in an SOC non-responder subgroup (NRSG), n=21, and in an SOC responder subgroup (RSG), n=9. A total of 102 adverse events (AEs) were recorded, of which 96% were 'mild' or 'moderate', and 91% were either a singular or transient event. Only 11 AEs were serious and associated with inpatient treatments unrelated to the studied intervention. In the NRSG, reductions in wound size were found to be statistically significant within the different study periods. Additionally, an acceleration of the healing rate was detected between the baseline and the first four weeks of COMS treatment (p=0.041). The rate of near-complete and complete wound closure in the SEP after 12 weeks were 60% and 43%, respectively. Pain reduction across the treatment group was statistically significant (p≤0.002 for both the SEP and NRSG). The Wound-QoL score improved by 24% during the study (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, COMS treatment for patients with hard-to-heal wounds on lower extremities was a safe and effective novel treatment option, especially for patients who did not respond to SOC.

Comorbidity and Therapeutic Approaches in Patients with Necrobiosis Lipoidica.

BACKGROUND: Necrobiosis lipoidica (NL) is a rare granulomatous disorder of unknown aetiology. Randomized controlled studies are not available due to it being an orphan disease. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated patients in 2 dermatological centres to cluster data about epidemiology, the therapeutic approaches for NL, and their efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comorbidity and the efficacy of the applied treatment was assessed for 98 patients. RESULTS: We identified 54% of patients with concomitant diabetes and 19% with thyroidal disorders. Topical steroids (85.7%) were predominantly used followed by calcineurin inhibitors (31%) and phototherapy (41.8%). Systemically, fumaric acid esters were more frequently applied (26.8%) than steroids (24.4%) and dapsone (24.4%). Steroids, compression therapy, calcineurin inhibitors, phototherapy, fumaric acid esters, and dapsone showed remarkable efficacy. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic options were chosen individually in accordance with the severity of NL and presence of ulceration. Topical calcineurin inhibitors, systemic application of fumaric acid esters, and dapsone represent effective alternatives to the use of steroids.

Examples for the importance of radiophysical measurements in clinical phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: Optimal UV therapy requires regular surveillance of the variables that influence therapeutic success. In daily practice, phototherapy equipment is often operated with an attitude of "autocontrol." This implies that thorough control measurements of the emission spectra and calibration of UV fluences are not routinely performed. For both quality control and patient safety, it is essential to regularly check whether a UV source is providing the right target spectrum with the correct dose to the skin. METHODS: We have exemplarily taken three UV sources currently used in clinical practice and performed radiophysical measurements, i. e. determined emission spectra, radiation output and correctness of dose calculation. RESULTS: All three sources revealed either a largely inhomogeneous distribution pattern of radiation intensity, variation of radiation intensity over time or insufficient filtering of the UV lamp emission spectrum. Furthermore the dose calculation procedures had to be revised because of significant differences between the estimated and the administered UV doses. CONCLUSIONS: Radiophysical measurement of all UV-equipment in clinical use is a simple and effective way to improve the safety and reliability of phototherapy. Such measurements help to uncover technical flaws in radiation sources and prevent unnecessary side effects and UV exposure risks for the patient.

[Biologics in the treatment of psoriasis]. / Hoffnung für schwerste Fälle: "Biowaffen" gegen Psoriasis.

Currently, psoriasis is seen as a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease that is characterized by an increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The clarification of this pathogenetic cascade uncovered a number of points of departure for the development of causal therapy and led to the introduction of new medications--the so-called biologics. The following have already been approved in Germany: infliximab, etanercept, efalizumab and adalimumab. These are described, and their advantages and disadvantages in the clinical setting are discussed.

[Options for debridement in the therapy of chronic wounds]. / Optionen des Debridements in der Therapie chronischer Wunden.

Debridement is defined as the removal of non-vital tissue from wounds. In chronic wounds, debridement means the elimination of necrosis as well as the clearing away of wound dressings, foreign bodies, and other non-vital substances. Sufficient debridement represents one basic prerequisite for a non-delayed wound-healing process. In addition to treating the causal factors for delayed wound healing, debridement should be the first step in an adequate phase-adapted wound-bed preparation for chronic wounds. This report aims to review the different options available in the execution of debridement in chronic wounds. The following therapeutic measures are available for the debridement of chronic wounds: surgery, maggot therapy, laser, ultrasound, hydrotherapy, wet-to-dry method, autolysis, proteolytic enzymes, osmotic or chemical debridement. There is no single correct debridement for all patients! Patients are individuals and therefore different methods of debridement may make sense. Which therapeutic option is chosen is determined by multiple factors. Moreover, depending on the wound milieu, the successive application of different methods can be useful.