Obestatin prevents analgesic tolerance to morphine and reverses the effects of mild morphine withdrawal in mice.

Obestatin is a 23-amino acid gut-derived neuropeptide, encoded by the same gene with ghrelin. The goal of this study was to examine the effects of obestatin on the acute and chronic analgesic actions of morphine and on mild morphine withdrawal. Open-field (OF) and elevated plus maze (EPM) tests were used to assess mild morphine withdrawal-induced behavior changes and the heat-radiant tail-flick assay was used to investigate analgesic actions of morphine. CFLP male mice were treated twice a day with graded doses of morphine in EPM and OF experiments and once a day in tail-flick studies. Obestatin (1.5µg/2µl) was administrated once a day in all experiments. Furthermore, 0.2mg/kg naloxone or saline was administered after the final injection of morphine at a dose of 20mg/kg in EPM and OF. These behavioral parameters were monitored in the OF: the percentage of center ambulation time and distance; whereas in the EPM: the time spent in open arms and the entries into open arms compared to the total time (%OAT) and entries (%OAE). In the OF, obestatin significantly decreased the percentage of time spent in the center in mice undergoing naloxone-precipitated mild morphine withdrawal. EPM results were similar to open field, but obestatin had no significant effect on parameters mentioned above. Besides, obestatin maintained the analgesic effect of morphine 90 and 120min after morphine injection in mice treated with morphine receiving obestatin compared to mice treated with morphine. In tolerance studies, obestatin diminished the analgesic tolerance to morphine on the 5th day. In this study we confirmed that obestatin reversed the effect of mild morphine withdrawal and enhances the analgesic effect of morphine. These data suggest that obestatin may have a role in opioid-induced analgesia and in behavioral responses induced by opioid withdrawal.

Intranasal application of secretin, similarly to intracerebroventricular administration, influences the motor behavior of mice probably through specific receptors.

Secretin and its receptors show wide distribution in the central nervous system. It was demonstrated previously that intravenous (i.v.) and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) application of secretin influenced the behavior of rat, mouse, and human. In our previous experiment, we used a special animal model, Japanese waltzing mice (JWM). These animals run around without stopping (the ambulation distance is very limited) and they do not bother with their environment. The i.c.v. secretin attenuated this hyperactive repetitive movement. In the present work, the effect of i.c.v. and intranasal (i.n.) application of secretin was compared. We have also looked for the presence of secretin receptors in the brain structures related to motor functions. Two micrograms of i.c.v. secretin improved the horizontal movement of JWM, enhancing the ambulation distance. It was nearly threefold higher in treated than in control animals. The i.n. application of secretin to the left nostril once or twice a day or once for 3 days more effectively enhanced the ambulation distance than i.c.v. administration. When secretin was given twice a day for 3 days it had no effect. Secretin did not improve the explorative behavior (the rearing), of JWM. With the use of in situ hybridization, we have found very dense secretin receptor labeling in the cerebellum. In the primary motor cortex and in the striatum, only a few labeled cells were seen. It was supposed that secretin exerted its effect through specific receptors, mainly present in the cerebellum.