Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 52(2): 84-91, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29388173

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines and related drugs (BZDR) should be avoided in patients with cognitive impairment. We evaluated the relationship between a BZDR treatment and the health status of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 395 AD patients using bivariate and multiple logistic analyses to assess correlations between the prescription of BZDR and patients' characteristics (cognitive and functional capacity, health-related quality of life (HrQoL), neuropsychiatric symptoms). RESULTS: BZDR were used in 12.4% (n=49) of all participants. In bivariate analyses, the prescription was associated with a lower HrQoL, a higher need of care, and the presence of anxiety. Multivariate models revealed a higher risk of BZDR treatment in patients with depression (OR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.45 - 10.27). Community-dwelling participants and those treated by neurologists/psychiatrists had a lower risk of receiving BZDR (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12 - 0.89 and OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.36). DISCUSSION: The inappropriate use of BZDR conflicts with national and international guidelines. We suggest evaluating indications and treatment duration and improving the knowledge of alternative therapies in healthcare institutions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Disfunción Cognitiva/inducido químicamente , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Escala del Estado Mental , Calidad de Vida/psicología
2.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 138(3): 331-337, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29198046

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures have increased medical and socio-economic importance due to demographic transition. Information concerning direct treatment costs and their reimbursement in Germany is lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred two hip fracture patients older than 60 years of age were observed prospectively at a German University Hospital. Treatment costs were determined with up to 196 cost factors and compared to the reimbursement. Finally, statistical analysis was performed to identify clinical parameters influencing the cost-reimbursement relation. RESULTS: Treatment costs were 8853 € (95% CI 8297-9410 €), while reimbursement was 8196 € (95% CI 7707-8772 €), resulting in a deficit of 657 € (95% CI 143-1117 €). Bivariate analysis showed that the cost-reimbursement relation was negatively influenced mainly by higher age, higher ASA score, readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and red blood cell transfusion. Adjusted for other parameters, readmission to the ICU was a significant negative predictor (- 2669 €; 95% CI - 4070 to - 1268 €; p < 0.001), while age of 60-75 years was a positive predictor for the cost-reimbursement relation (1373 €; 95% CI 265-2480 €; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of geriatric hip fracture patients in a university hospital in Germany does not seem to be cost-covering. Adjustment of the reimbursement for treatment of complex hip fracture patients should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/economía , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/economía , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Alemania , Hemiartroplastia/economía , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Alzheimers Res Ther ; 9(1): 22, 2017 Mar 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28335810

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Errorless learning (EL) is a method for optimizing learning, which uses feed-forward instructions in order to prevent people from making mistakes during the learning process. The majority of previous studies on EL taught patients with dementia artificial tasks of little or no relevance for their daily lives. Furthermore, only a few controlled studies on EL have so far been performed and just a handful of studies have examined the long-term effects of EL. Tasks were not always trained in the patients' natural or home environment, limiting the external validity of these studies. This multicenter parallel randomized controlled trial examines the effects of EL compared with trial and error learning (TEL) on the performance of activities of daily living in persons with Alzheimer's or mixed-type dementia living at home. METHODS: Patients received nine 1-hour task training sessions over eight weeks using EL or TEL. Task performance was measured using video observations at week 16. Secondary outcome measures were task performance measured at week 26, satisfaction with treatment, need for assistance, challenging behavior, adverse events, resource utilization and treatment costs. RESULTS: A total of 161 participants were randomized, of whom 71 completed the EL and 74 the TEL arm at week 11. Sixty-nine EL patients and 71 TEL patients were assessed at the 16-week follow-up (the primary measurement endpoint). Intention-to-treat analysis showed a significantly improved task performance in both groups. No significant differences between the treatment groups were found for primary or secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Structured relearning improved the performance of activities of daily living. Improvements were maintained for 6 months. EL had no additional effect over TEL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Register of Clinical Trials DRKS00003117 . Registered 31 May 2011.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica/métodos , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/rehabilitación , Rehabilitación Neurológica/métodos , Desempeño Psicomotor , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Países Bajos , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Mov Disord ; 31(8): 1183-91, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27506638

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent research efforts have focused on the effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN DBS) for selected patients with mild-to-moderate PD experiencing motor complications. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the cost utility of subthalamic DBS compared with the best medical treatment for German patients below the age of 61 with early motor complications of PD. METHODS: We applied a previously published Markov model that integrated health utilities based on EuroQoL and direct costs over patients' lifetime adjusted to the German health care payer perspective (year of costing: 2013). Effectiveness was evaluated using the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 summary index. We performed sensitivity analyses to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost-utility ratio for STN DBS compared to best medical treatment was 22,700 Euros per quality-adjusted life year gained. The time to, and costs for, battery exchange had a major effect on the incremental cost-utility ratios, but never exceeded a threshold of 50,000 Euros per quality-adjusted life year. CONCLUSIONS: Our decision analysis supports the fact that STN DBS at earlier stages of the disease is cost-effective in patients below the age of 61 when compared with the best medical treatment in the German health care system. This finding was supported by detailed sensitivity analyses reporting robust results. Whereas the EARLYSTIM study has shown STN DBS to be superior to medical therapy with respect to quality of life for patients with early motor complications, this further analysis has shown its cost-effectiveness. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/economía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enfermedad de Parkinson/economía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Núcleo Subtalámico , Adulto , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida
5.
Brain ; 127(Pt 12): 2629-35, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15469948

RESUMEN

Neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic (HI) brain injury resulting in encephalopathy is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality with no effective treatment. Here we show that caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), an active component of propolis, administered either before or after an HI insult, significantly prevents HI-induced neonatal rat brain damage in the cortex, hippocampus and thalamus. In addition to blocking HI-induced caspase 3 activation, CAPE also inhibits HI-mediated expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and caspase 1 in vivo and potently blocks nitric oxide-induced neurotoxicity in vitro. Furthermore, CAPE directly inhibits Ca2+-induced cytochrome c release from isolated brain mitochondria. Thus, CAPE induces neuroprotection against HI-induced neuronal death, possibly by blocking HI-induced inflammation and/or directly inhibiting the HI-induced neuronal death pathway. CAPE may therefore be a novel effective therapy for preventing neonatal HI injury.


Asunto(s)
Ácidos Cafeicos/uso terapéutico , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Alcohol Feniletílico/análogos & derivados , Alcohol Feniletílico/uso terapéutico , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Calcio/farmacología , Caspasa 3 , Caspasas/metabolismo , Células Cultivadas , Citocromos c/metabolismo , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Activación Enzimática/efectos de los fármacos , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica/metabolismo , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica/patología , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Neuronas/efectos de los fármacos , Neuronas/patología , Óxido Nítrico/fisiología , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo II , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley
6.
Mov Disord ; 18 Suppl 7: S52-62, 2003 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14531047

RESUMEN

As a diagnostic test for patients with suspected Parkinson's disease (PD), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using [(123)I]FP-CIT tracer has better sensitivity but is more expensive than regular clinical examination (CE). Our objective was to evaluate the clinical and economic impacts of different diagnostic strategies involving [(123)I]FP-CIT SPECT. We developed a decision tree model to predict adequate treatment-month equivalents (ATME), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) during a 12-month time horizon in patients with suspected PD referred to a specialized movement disorder outpatient clinic. In our cost- effectiveness analysis, we adopted the perspective of the German health care system and used data from a German prospective health care utilization study (n = 142) and published diagnostic studies. Compared strategies were CE only (EXAM+), SPECT only (SPECT+), SPECT following negative CE (SINGLE+), and SPECT following positive CE (DOUBLE+). Costs of SPECT amounted to euro;789 per investigation. Based on our model, expected costs (and ATME) were euro;946 (52.85 ATME) for EXAM+, euro;1352 (53.40 ATME) for DOUBLE+, euro;1731 (32.82 ATME) for SINGLE+, and euro;2003 (32.96 ATME) for SPECT+; performance of SPECT was induced in 0%, 54%, 56%, and 100% of the patients, respectively. DOUBLE+ was more effective and less expensive than SINGLE+ or SPECT+; thus these two do not offer reasonable choices. The ICER of DOUBLE+ compared to EXAM+ was euro;733 per ATME gained. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER of DOUBLE+ versus EXAM+ ranged from euro;63 to euro;2411 per ATME gained. Whether the diagnostic work-up of patients referred to a specialized movement disorder clinic with a high prevalence of PD should include [(123)I]FP-CIT SPECT depends on patient preferences and the decision maker's willingness to pay for adequate early treatment. SPECT should be used as a confirmatory test before treatment initiation and limited to patients with a positive test result in the clinical examination. These results should be adjusted to the specific setting and individual patient preferences.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Árboles de Decisión , Dihidroxifenilalanina/análogos & derivados , Glicoproteínas de Membrana , Proteínas de Transporte de Membrana/análisis , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso , Examen Neurológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Proteínas de Transporte de Dopamina a través de la Membrana Plasmática , Alemania , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Examen Neurológico/economía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/economía , Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/economía , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA