Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(11): 1522-1531, 2017 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28329181

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND.: Enteric fever, caused by Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A, is the leading cause of bacterial febrile disease in South Asia. METHODS.: Individual data from 2092 patients with enteric fever randomized into 4 trials in Kathmandu, Nepal, were pooled. All trials compared gatifloxacin with 1 of the following comparator drugs: cefixime, chloramphenicol, ofloxacin, or ceftriaxone. Treatment outcomes were evaluated according to antimicrobial if S. Typhi/Paratyphi were isolated from blood. We additionally investigated the impact of changing bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility on outcome. RESULTS.: Overall, 855 (41%) patients had either S. Typhi (n = 581, 28%) or S. Paratyphi A (n = 274, 13%) cultured from blood. There were 139 (6.6%) treatment failures with 1 death. Except for the last trial with ceftriaxone, the fluoroquinolone gatifloxacin was associated with equivalent or better fever clearance times and lower treatment failure rates in comparison to all other antimicrobials. However, we additionally found that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against fluoroquinolones have risen significantly since 2005 and were associated with increasing fever clearance times. Notably, all organisms were susceptible to ceftriaxone throughout the study period (2005-2014), and the MICs against azithromycin declined, confirming the utility of these alternative drugs for enteric fever treatment. CONCLUSION.: The World Health Organization and local government health ministries in South Asia still recommend fluoroquinolones for enteric fever. This policy should change based on the evidence provided here. Rapid diagnostics are urgently required given the large numbers of suspected enteric fever patients with a negative culture.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Fiebre Paratifoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Salmonella paratyphi A/efectos de los fármacos , Salmonella typhi/efectos de los fármacos , Fiebre Tifoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Azitromicina/administración & dosificación , Azitromicina/farmacología , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Ceftriaxona/administración & dosificación , Ceftriaxona/farmacología , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas/administración & dosificación , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacología , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Gatifloxacina , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Nepal/epidemiología , Ofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Ofloxacino/farmacología , Ofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Fiebre Paratifoidea/microbiología , Salmonella paratyphi A/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonella typhi/aislamiento & purificación , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fiebre Tifoidea/sangre , Fiebre Tifoidea/epidemiología , Fiebre Tifoidea/microbiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Elife ; 5: e14003, 2016 Mar 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26974227

RESUMEN

The interplay between bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility, phylogenetics and patient outcome is poorly understood. During a typhoid clinical treatment trial in Nepal, we observed several treatment failures and isolated highly fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi). Seventy-eight S. Typhi isolates were genome sequenced and clinical observations, treatment failures and fever clearance times (FCTs) were stratified by lineage. Most fluoroquinolone-resistant S. Typhi belonged to a specific H58 subclade. Treatment failure with S. Typhi-H58 was significantly less frequent with ceftriaxone (3/31; 9.7%) than gatifloxacin (15/34; 44.1%)(Hazard Ratio 0.19, p=0.002). Further, for gatifloxacin-treated patients, those infected with fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms had significantly higher median FCTs (8.2 days) than those infected with susceptible (2.96) or intermediately resistant organisms (4.01)(pS. Typhi clade internationally, but there are no data regarding disease outcome with this organism. We report an emergent new subclade of S. Typhi-H58 that is associated with fluoroquinolone treatment failure.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Genotipo , Salmonella typhi/efectos de los fármacos , Fiebre Tifoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Gatifloxacina , Humanos , Nepal , Salmonella typhi/clasificación , Salmonella typhi/aislamiento & purificación , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Fiebre Tifoidea/microbiología
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 59(5): 2756-64, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25733500

RESUMEN

Azithromycin is an effective treatment for uncomplicated infections with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and serovar Paratyphi A (enteric fever), but there are no clinically validated MIC and disk zone size interpretative guidelines. We studied individual patient data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antimicrobial treatment in enteric fever in Vietnam, with azithromycin used in one treatment arm, to determine the relationship between azithromycin treatment response and the azithromycin MIC of the infecting isolate. We additionally compared the azithromycin MIC and the disk susceptibility zone sizes of 1,640 S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A clinical isolates collected from seven Asian countries. In the RCTs, 214 patients who were treated with azithromycin at a dose of 10 to 20 mg/ml for 5 to 7 days were analyzed. Treatment was successful in 195 of 214 (91%) patients, with no significant difference in response (cure rate, fever clearance time) with MICs ranging from 4 to 16 µg/ml. The proportion of Asian enteric fever isolates with an MIC of ≤ 16 µg/ml was 1,452/1,460 (99.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 98.9 to 99.7) for S. Typhi and 207/240 (86.3%; 95% CI, 81.2 to 90.3) (P < 0.001) for S. Paratyphi A. A zone size of ≥ 13 mm to a 5-µg azithromycin disk identified S. Typhi isolates with an MIC of ≤ 16 µg/ml with a sensitivity of 99.7%. An azithromycin MIC of ≤ 16 µg/ml or disk inhibition zone size of ≥ 13 mm enabled the detection of susceptible S. Typhi isolates that respond to azithromycin treatment. Further work is needed to define the response to treatment in S. Typhi isolates with an azithromycin MIC of >16 µg/ml and to determine MIC and disk breakpoints for S. Paratyphi A.


Asunto(s)
Azitromicina/farmacología , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Salmonella enterica/efectos de los fármacos , Salmonella enterica/patogenicidad , Fiebre Tifoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Serogrupo , Adulto Joven
4.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 5(8): e1264, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21829747

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The bacterial genus Shigella is the leading cause of dysentery. There have been significant increases in the proportion of Shigella isolated that demonstrate resistance to nalidixic acid. While nalidixic acid is no longer considered as a therapeutic agent for shigellosis, the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin is the current recommendation of the World Health Organization. Resistance to nalidixic acid is a marker of reduced susceptibility to older generation fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin. We aimed to assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated shigellosis in children. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled trial with two parallel arms at two hospitals in southern Vietnam. The study was designed as a superiority trial and children with dysentery meeting the inclusion criteria were invited to participate. Participants received either gatifloxacin (10 mg/kg/day) in a single daily dose for 3 days or ciprofloxacin (30 mg/kg/day) in two divided doses for 3 days. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure; secondary outcome measures were time to the cessation of individual symptoms. Four hundred and ninety four patients were randomized to receive either gatifloxacin (n=249) or ciprofloxacin (n=245), of which 107 had a positive Shigella stool culture. We could not demonstrate superiority of gatifloxacin and observed similar clinical failure rate in both groups (gatifloxacin; 12.0% and ciprofloxacin; 11.0%, p=0.72). The median (inter-quartile range) time from illness onset to cessation of all symptoms was 95 (66-126) hours for gatifloxacin recipients and 93 (68-120) hours for the ciprofloxacin recipients (Hazard Ratio [95%CI]=0.98 [0.82-1.17], p=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in Vietnam, where nalidixic acid resistant Shigellae are highly prevalent, ciprofloxacin and gatifloxacin are similarly effective for the treatment of acute shigellosis.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Disentería Bacilar/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Shigella/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Disentería Bacilar/sangre , Disentería Bacilar/metabolismo , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas/efectos adversos , Gatifloxacina , Hospitales , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/microbiología , Hipoglucemia/microbiología , Lactante , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vietnam
5.
PLoS One ; 3(5): e2188, 2008 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18493312

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug resistant typhoid fever is a major clinical problem globally. Many of the first line antibiotics, including the older generation fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, are failing. OBJECTIVES: We performed a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin (10 mg/kg/day) versus azithromycin (20 mg/kg/day) as a once daily oral dose for 7 days for the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in children and adults in Vietnam. METHODS: An open-label multi-centre randomised trial with pre-specified per protocol analysis and intention to treat analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was fever clearance time, the secondary outcome was overall treatment failure (clinical or microbiological failure, development of typhoid fever-related complications, relapse or faecal carriage of S. typhi). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We enrolled 358 children and adults with suspected typhoid fever. There was no death in the study. 287 patients had blood culture confirmed typhoid fever, 145 patients received gatifloxacin and 142 patients received azithromycin. The median FCT was 106 hours in both treatment arms (95% Confidence Interval [CI]; 94-118 hours for gatifloxacin versus 88-112 hours for azithromycin), (logrank test p = 0.984, HR [95% CI] = 1.0 [0.80-1.26]). Overall treatment failure occurred in 13/145 (9%) patients in the gatifloxacin group and 13/140 (9.3%) patients in the azithromycin group, (logrank test p = 0.854, HR [95% CI] = 0.93 [0.43-2.0]). 96% (254/263) of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid and 58% (153/263) were multidrug resistant. CONCLUSIONS: Both antibiotics showed an excellent efficacy and safety profile. Both gatifloxacin and azithromycin can be recommended for the treatment of typhoid fever particularly in regions with high rates of multidrug and nalidixic acid resistance. The cost of a 7-day treatment course of gatifloxacin is approximately one third of the cost of azithromycin in Vietnam. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN67946944.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Fiebre Tifoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Niño , Gatifloxacina , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Salmonella/clasificación , Salmonella/efectos de los fármacos , Especificidad de la Especie
6.
PLoS One ; 2(6): e542, 2007 Jun 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17593957

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. DESIGN: A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. SETTING: Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with clinically diagnosed uncomplicated enteric fever meeting the inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated to receive one of two drugs, Gatifloxacin or Cefixime. The dosages used were Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg, given once daily for 7 days, or Cefixime 20 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses for 7 days. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was fever clearance time. The secondary outcome measure was overall treatment failure (acute treatment failure and relapse). RESULTS: Randomization was carried out in 390 patients before enrollment was suspended on the advice of the independent data safety monitoring board due to significant differences in both primary and secondary outcome measures in the two arms and the attainment of a priori defined endpoints. Median (95% confidence interval) fever clearance times were 92 hours (84-114 hours) for gatifloxacin recipients and 138 hours (105-164 hours) for cefixime-treated patients (Hazard Ratio[95%CI] = 2.171 [1.545-3.051], p<0.0001). 19 out of 70 (27%) patients who completed the 7 day trial had acute clinical failure in the cefixime group as compared to 1 out of 88 patients (1%) in gatifloxacin group(Odds Ratio [95%CI] = 0.031 [0.004 - 0.237], p<0.001). Overall treatment failure patients (relapsed patients plus acute treatment failure patients plus death) numbered 29. They were determined to be (95% confidence interval) 37.6 % (27.14%-50.2%) in the cefixime group and 3.5% (2.2%-11.5%) in the gatifloxacin group (HR[95%CI] = 0.084 [0.025-0.280], p<0.0001). There was one death in the cefixime group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, gatifloxacin is a better treatment for uncomplicated enteric fever as compared to cefixime. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75784880.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Cefixima/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Fiebre Tifoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Gatifloxacina , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Salmonella/clasificación , Salmonella/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Salmonella/tratamiento farmacológico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
7.
J Ethnopharmacol ; 109(3): 417-27, 2007 Feb 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17010546

RESUMEN

Malaria is a major global public health problem and the alarming spread of drug resistance and limited number of effective drugs now available underline how important it is to discover new antimalarial compounds. An ethnopharmacological investigation was undertaken of medicinal plants traditionally used to treat malaria in the South Vietnam. Forty-nine plants were identified, 228 extracts were prepared and tested for their in vitro activity against Plasmodium falciparum, and assessed for any cytotoxicity against the human cancer cell line HeLa and the embryonic lung MRC5 cell line. In a first screening at a concentration of 10 microg/ml, 92 extracts from 46 plants showed antiplasmodial activity (parasite growth inhibition >30%). The IC(50) values of the most active extracts were determined as well as their selectivity towards Plasmodium falciparum in comparison to their cytotoxic effects against the human cell lines. Six plants showed interesting antiplasmodial activity (IC(50) ranging from 0.4 to 8.6 microg/ml) with a good selectivity: two Menispermaceae, Arcangelisia flava (L.) Merr. and Fibraurea tinctoria Lour., and also Harrisonia perforata (Blanco) Merr. (Simaroubaceae), Irvingia malayana Oliv. ex Benn. (Irvingiaceae), Elaeocarpus kontumensis Gagn. (Elaeocarpaceae) and Anneslea fragrans Wall. (Theaceae).


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/farmacología , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Cloroquina , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Etnofarmacología , Células HeLa , Humanos , Plantas Medicinales/química , Vietnam
8.
Lancet ; 363(9402): 18-22, 2004 Jan 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14723988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Southeast Asia has the most resistant malaria parasites in the world, which severely limits treatment options. There is general acceptance that to combat resistance, combinations of antimalarial drugs that include an artemisinin derivative should be used, and, if possible, these should be formulated in a single tablet. METHODS: We did a pilot randomised study in a tertiary referral hospital in Vietnam to compare the efficacy of 3-day regimens of dihydroartemisinin-trimethoprim-piperaquine (DHA-TP total dose 4.8/13.6/48 mg/kg, respectively) with the standard antimalarial regimen in Vietnam, artesunate-mefloquine (A3M total dose 12/25 mg/kg, respectively) in non-immune patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. 114 patients were randomised, 76 to DHA-TP and 38 to A3M. The subsequent open randomised trial at a Provincial Health Station compared DHA-TP, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, and A3M in 400 patients. In both studies all patients received directly observed therapy and were followed up for 56 days. The primary endpoint was reappearance of P falciparum malaria within 56 days of treatment. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The 56-day cure rate in the pilot study, adjusted for reinfections identified by PCR genotyping, was 97.4% (74/76) in the DHA-TP group and 100% (38/38) in the A3M group. In the second study, cure rates were similar in the three groups; DHA-TP 97.4% (153/157), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine 98.7% (164/166), and A3M 98.7% (76/77). The DHA-TP and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine regimens were well tolerated; fewer than 3% of patients had side-effects that might have been related to treatment, compared with 16% of A3M patients (p<0.001). No patients were lost to follow-up. INTERPRETATION: Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine is an inexpensive, safe, highly efficacious fixed-dose antimalarial combination treatment that could make an important contribution to the control of multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria.


Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Sesquiterpenos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Niño , Preescolar , Combinación de Medicamentos , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Sesquiterpenos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trimetoprim/administración & dosificación , Trimetoprim/uso terapéutico , Vietnam
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA