Post-operative electrical muscle stimulation attenuates loss of muscle mass and function following major abdominal surgery in older adults: a split body randomised control trial.

INTRODUCTION: Significant losses of muscle mass and function occur after major abdominal surgery. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been shown to reduce muscle atrophy in some patient groups, but evidence in post-operative patients is limited. This study assesses the efficacy of NMES for attenuating muscle atrophy and functional declines following major abdominal surgery in older adults. METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing open colorectal resection completed a split body randomised control trial. Patients' lower limbs were randomised to control (CON) or NMES (STIM). The STIM limb underwent 15 minutes of quadriceps NMES twice daily on post-operative days (PODs) 1-4. Ultrasound measurements of Vastus Lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle thickness (MT) were made preoperatively and on POD 5, as was dynamometry to determine knee extensor strength (KES). Change in CSA was the primary outcome. All outcomes were statistically analysed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: NMES significantly reduced the loss of CSA (-2.52 versus -9.16%, P < 0.001), MT (-2.76 versus -8.145, P = 0.001) and KES (-10.35 versus -19.69%, P = 0.03) compared to CON. No adverse events occurred, and patients reported that NMES caused minimal or no discomfort and felt that ~90-minutes of NMES daily would be tolerable. DISCUSSION: NMES reduces losses of muscle mass and function following major abdominal surgery, and as such, may be the promising tool for post-operative recovery. This is important in preventing long-term post-operative dependency, especially in the increasingly frail older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Further studies should establish the efficacy of bilateral NMES for improving patient-centred outcomes.

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of the effects of eicosapentaenoic acid supplementation on muscle inflammation and physical function in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection.

BACKGROUND: Resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) initiates inflammation, mediated at least partly by NFĸB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells), leading to muscle catabolism and reduced physical performance. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) has been shown to modulate NFĸB, but evidence for its benefit around the time of surgery is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of EPA supplementation on muscle inflammation and physical function around the time of major surgery. DESIGN: In a double-blind randomized control trial, 61 patients (age: 68.3 ± 0.95 y; 42 male) scheduled for CRC resection, received 3 g per day of EPA (n = 32) or placebo (n = 29) for 5-days before and 21-days after operation. Lean muscle mass (LMM) (via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)), anaerobic threshold (AT) (via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)) and hand-grip strength (HG) were assessed before and 4-weeks after surgery, with muscle biopsies (m. vastus lateralis) obtained for the assessment of NF-ĸB protein expression. RESULTS: There were no differences in muscle NFĸB between EPA and placebo groups (mean difference (MD) -0.002; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.19 to 0.19); p = 0.98). There was no difference in LMM (MD 704.77 g; 95% CI -1045.6 g-2455.13 g; p = 0.42) or AT (MD 1.11 mls/kg/min; 95% CI -0.52 mls/kg/min to 2.74 mls/kg/min; p = 0.18) between the groups. Similarly, there was no difference between the groups in HG at follow up (MD 0.1; 95% CI -1.88 to 2.08; p = 0.81). Results were similar when missing data was imputed. CONCLUSION: EPA supplementation confers no benefit in terms of inflammatory status, as judged by NFĸB, or preservation of LMM, aerobic capacity or physical function following major colorectal surgery. CLINICAL TRIALS REFERENCE: NCT01320319.

Baseline Morphine Consumption May Explain Between-Study Heterogeneity in Meta-analyses of Adjuvant Analgesics and Improve Precision and Accuracy of Effect Estimates.

BACKGROUND: Statistical heterogeneity can increase the uncertainty of results and reduce the quality of evidence derived from systematic reviews. At present, it is uncertain what the major factors are that account for heterogeneity in meta-analyses of analgesic adjuncts. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify whether various covariates could explain statistical heterogeneity and use this to improve accuracy when reporting the efficacy of analgesics. METHODS: We searched for reviews using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. First, we identified the existence of considerable statistical heterogeneity (I > 75%). Second, we conducted meta-regression analysis for the outcome of 24-hour morphine consumption using baseline risk (control group morphine consumption) and other clinical and methodological covariates. Finally, we constructed a league table of adjuvant analgesics using a novel method of reporting effect estimates assuming a fixed consumption of 50 mg postoperative morphine. RESULTS: We included 344 randomized controlled trials with 28,130 participants. Ninety-one percent of analyses showed considerable statistical heterogeneity. Baseline risk was a significant cause of between-study heterogeneity for acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, tramadol, ketamine, α2-agonists, gabapentin, pregabalin, lidocaine, magnesium, and dexamethasone (R = 21%-100%; P < .05). There was some evidence that the methodological limitations of the trials explained some of the residual heterogeneity. Type of surgery was not independently associated with analgesic efficacy. Assuming a fixed baseline risk of 50 mg (in order of efficacy), gabapentin, acetaminophen, α2-agonists, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, pregabalin, tramadol, magnesium, and lidocaine demonstrated moderate clinically significant reductions (>10 mg). We could not exclude a moderate clinically significant effect with ketamine. Dexamethasone demonstrated a small clinical benefit (>5 mg). CONCLUSIONS: We empirically identified baseline morphine consumption as the major source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of adjuvant analgesics across all surgical interventions. Controlling for baseline morphine consumption, clinicians can use audit data to estimate the morphine-reducing effect of adding any adjuvant for their local population, regardless which surgery they undergo. Moreover, we have utilized these findings to present a novel method of reporting and an amended method of graphically displaying effect estimates, which both reduces confounding from variable baseline risk in included trials and is able to adjust for other clinical and methodological confounding variables. We recommend use of these methods in clinical practice and future reviews of analgesics for postoperative pain.