Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Care ; 61(10): 708-714, 2023 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37943526

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Routine self-monitoring of blood glucose is a low-value practice that provides limited benefit for patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVES: We estimated the costs of Rethink the Strip (RTS), a multistrategy approach to the de-implementation of self-monitoring of blood glucose in primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN: RTS was conducted among 20 primary care clinics in North Carolina. We estimated the non-site-based and site-based costs of the 5 RTS strategies (practice facilitation, audit and feedback, provider champions, educational meetings, and educational materials) from the analytic perspective of an integrated health care system for 12 and 27-month time horizons. Material costs were tracked through project records, and personnel costs were assessed using activity-based costing. We used nationally based wage estimates. RESULTS: Total RTS costs equaled $68,941 for 12 months. Specifically, non-site-based costs comprised $16,560. Most non-site-based costs ($11,822) were from the foundational programming and coding updates to the electronic health record data to develop the audit and feedback reports. The non-site-based costs of educational meetings, practice facilitation, and educational materials were substantially lower, ranging between ~$400 and $1000. Total 12-month site-based costs equaled $2569 for a single clinic (or $52,381 for 20 clinics). Educational meetings were the most expensive strategy, averaging $1401 per clinic. The site-based costs for the 4 other implementation strategies were markedly lower, ranging between $51 for educational materials and $555 for practice facilitation per clinic. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed cost information for implementation strategies used to support evidence-based programs in primary care clinics.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Escolaridad , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
JAMA ; 330(5): 454-459, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37526713

RESUMEN

Importance: Neural tube defects are among the most common congenital malformations in the US, with an estimated 3000 pregnancies affected each year. Many of these neural tube defects are caused by low folate levels in the body. Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a reaffirmation evidence update on the benefits and harms of folic acid supplementation. Population: Persons who are planning to or could become pregnant. Evidence Assessment: The USPSTF concludes that, for persons who are planning to or could become pregnant, there is high certainty that folic acid supplementation has a substantial net benefit to prevent neural tube defects in their offspring. Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends that all persons planning to or who could become pregnant take a daily supplement containing 0.4 to 0.8 mg (400 to 800 µg) of folic acid. (A recommendation).


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico , Ácido Fólico , Defectos del Tubo Neural , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Comités Consultivos , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Fólico/uso terapéutico , Tamizaje Masivo , Defectos del Tubo Neural/etiología , Defectos del Tubo Neural/prevención & control , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico/complicaciones , Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico/diagnóstico , Deficiencia de Ácido Fólico/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Atención Preconceptiva/normas
3.
JAMA ; 327(23): 2326-2333, 2022 06 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35727271

RESUMEN

Importance: According to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, 52% of surveyed US adults reported using at least 1 dietary supplement in the prior 30 days and 31% reported using a multivitamin-mineral supplement. The most commonly cited reason for using supplements is for overall health and wellness and to fill nutrient gaps in the diet. Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the 2 leading causes of death and combined account for approximately half of all deaths in the US annually. Inflammation and oxidative stress have been shown to have a role in both cardiovascular disease and cancer, and dietary supplements may have anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects. Objective: To update its 2014 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a review of the evidence on the efficacy of supplementation with single nutrients, functionally related nutrient pairs, or multivitamins for reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality in the general adult population, as well as the harms of supplementation. Population: Community-dwelling, nonpregnant adults. Evidence Assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the harms of beta carotene supplementation outweigh the benefits for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. The USPSTF also concludes with moderate certainty that there is no net benefit of supplementation with vitamin E for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms of supplementation with multivitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. Evidence is lacking and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms of supplementation with single or paired nutrients (other than beta carotene and vitamin E) for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. Evidence is lacking and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends against the use of beta carotene or vitamin E supplements for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. (D recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of the use of multivitamin supplements for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of the use of single- or paired-nutrient supplements (other than beta carotene and vitamin E) for the prevention of cardiovascular disease or cancer. (I statement).


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Suplementos Dietéticos , Minerales , Neoplasias , Vitaminas , Adulto , Humanos , Comités Consultivos , beta Caroteno/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Tamizaje Masivo , Minerales/efectos adversos , Minerales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Encuestas Nutricionales , Medición de Riesgo , Vitamina E/efectos adversos , Vitaminas/efectos adversos , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico
4.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 28(5): 658-62, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26355138

RESUMEN

Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) have been in existence for several decades, and they provide one mechanism to conduct research outside of academic research centers. Two transformative changes to the practice environment pose significant challenges to the manner in which PBRNs have functioned in the past and require changes to their current activities. The widespread introduction of electronic health records and the organization of practices into often hospital-dominated integrated delivery systems change the manner in which medicine is practiced, administered, and financed. Research funders are committed to extending research into communities, although we have yet to learn how to conduct these activities efficiently. We describe a number of operational challenges to this transformation, and we also propose ways to address these challenges and improve the quality and efficiency through which research is conducted. PBRNs can ensure their relevance in the research environment by adapting to this new era.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/organización & administración , Humanos , Estados Unidos
5.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20142014 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24966255

RESUMEN

We present a case of clinically relevant and probable interaction between warfarin and scuppernongs in a 73-year-old woman where ingestion of scuppernongs, a variety of quercetin-containing muscadine grapes, over a period of 2 months was associated with elevations in the International Normalised Ratio to supratherapeutic levels. While muscadine grapes and specifically scuppernongs are found primarily in Southeastern USA, the flavonoid in questionand quercetin is found worldwide as a dietary supplement.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Frutas/química , Quercetina , Vitis/química , Warfarina , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/farmacología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Flavonoides/farmacología , Interacciones Alimento-Droga , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Quercetina/farmacología , Warfarina/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA