Health outcomes in redlined versus non-redlined neighborhoods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Redlining was a racialized zoning practice in the U.S. that blocked fair access to home loans during the 1930s, and recent research is illuminating health problems in the current residents of these historically redlined areas. However, this work has not yet been holistically summarized. Here, we present the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing health outcomes in redlined versus non-redlined neighborhoods in U.S. cities. METHODS: We extracted relevant articles in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Science Direct databases published from January 2010 to September 2021. RESULTS: The search revealed 12 studies on preterm births (n = 3), gunshot-related injuries (n = 2), cancer (n = 1), asthma (n = 1), self-rated health (n = 1), multiple health outcomes (n = 2), heat-related outcomes (n = 1) and COVID-19 incidence and mortality (n = 1). A meta-analysis of three studies found the odds of having preterm birth was significantly higher (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.88; p = 0.02) among women living in redlined areas compared to those in non-redlined areas. Review of other outcomes revealed that gunshot-related injuries, asthma, heat-related outcomes, and multiple chronic conditions were worse in redlined areas, while associations with cancer varied by cancer type. In terms of cause-specific mortality, one study revealed no link between residential redlining and infant mortality rate, while one study on COVID-19 outcomes was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this review presents evidence that living in historically redlined areas is associated with increased risk of multiple serious adverse health outcomes. Further research on mechanisms, remediation, and neighborhood-level interventions is needed to strengthen the understanding of the impacts of redlining on health.

Association of childhood stress with late-life dementia and Alzheimer's disease: the KIHD study.

Background: There remains a dearth of life-course studies analyzing childhood environment and late-life chronic illness. In particular, few have addressed possible early-life predictors of dementia. This study examines relationships between childhood stress and later-age dementia, specifically Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: We used data from 2682 men in the population-based Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study who participated in extensive baseline health examinations and interviews between 1984 and 1989, when they were between 42 and 61 years of age. Childhood events were documented in these structured interviews. We created a composite childhood stress variable that included living in custody or an orphanage, experience of crisis in childhood, having problems with teachers and emigrating because of war. Data on incident cases of dementia, including AD, were obtained through 2014 via national health register linkages. Risk of developing dementia was estimated using Cox regression adjusting for age, education, income and prior/existing diseases at baseline. Results: Childhood stress was associated with increased risk of dementia (HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.12-3.10). Associations remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, education, income and other covariates (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.14-3.25). Associations were marginally significant with AD, with HRs of similar magnitude. Conclusions: Childhood stress plays an important role in late-life dementia risk among men. Support systems should be developed for children suffering from stressful conditions. Further research examining childhood social and environmental effects on later morbidity, in diverse populations, is necessary to develop a holistic understanding of life-course disease burden.