Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chest ; 150(6): e147-e150, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27938770

RESUMEN

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy, the administration of 100% oxygen at pressures > 1 atm, is believed to promote wound healing by increasing angiogenesis and collagen synthesis. To our knowledge, this treatment modality has never been described in patients with tracheal radionecrosis. Here, we report the case of a 55-year-old man diagnosed with stage IIIB lung adenocarcinoma who was treated with chemotherapy and concomitant external intensity-modulated radiotherapy involving the left lung and mediastinum. Nine months later, he presented with neck pain, cough with mucopurulent sputum, and fever. A PET-CT scan revealed a fissure in the posterior wall of the left upper trachea. Flexible bronchoscopy showed a tracheal ulceration with a small left posterior wall fissure that extended into the mediastinum. To our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature that suggests that treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy, local debridement, and antibiotics is a feasible and successful management option for patients with complicated tracheal radionecrosis.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Traumatismos por Radiación/terapia , Enfermedades de la Tráquea/terapia , Broncoscopía , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico por imagen , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Enfermedades de la Tráquea/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
Arch Intern Med ; 172(12): 922-8, 2012 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22732747

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The length of hospital stay (LOS) for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) varies considerably, even though this factor has a major impact on the cost of care. We aimed to determine whether the use of a 3-step critical pathway is safe and effective in reducing duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of stay in hospitalized patients with CAP. METHODS: We randomly assigned 401 adults who required hospitalization for CAP to follow a 3-step critical pathway including early mobilization and use of objective criteria for switching to oral antibiotic therapy and for deciding on hospital discharge or usual care. The primary end point was LOS. Secondary end points were the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy, adverse drug reactions, need for readmission, overall case-fatality rate, and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: Median LOS was 3.9 days in the 3-step group and 6.0 days in the usual care group (difference, -2.1 days; 95% CI, -2.7 to -1.7; P < .001). Median duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy was 2.0 days in the 3-step group and 4.0 days in the usual care group (difference, -2.0 days; 95% CI, -2.0 to -1.0; P < .001). More patients assigned to usual care experienced adverse drug reactions (4.5% vs 15.9% [difference, -11.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -17.2 to -5.6 percentage points; P < .001]). No significant differences were observed regarding subsequent readmissions, case fatality rate, and patients' satisfaction with care. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 3-step critical pathway was safe and effective in reducing the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and LOS for CAP and did not adversely affect patient outcomes. Such a strategy will help optimize the process of care of hospitalized patients with CAP, and hospital costs would be reduced. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN17875607.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Vías Clínicas , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ambulación Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
Arch Intern Med ; 167(13): 1393-9, 2007 Jul 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17620533

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) has been proposed as a new category of respiratory infection. However, limited data exist to validate this entity. We aimed to ascertain the epidemiology, causative organisms, antibiotic susceptibilities, and outcomes of and empirical antibiotic therapy for HCAP requiring hospitalization. METHODS: Observational analysis of a prospective cohort of nonseverely immunosuppressed hospitalized adults with pneumonia. Patients who had recent contact with the health care system through nursing homes, home health care programs, hemodialysis clinics, or prior hospitalization were considered to have HCAP. RESULTS: Of 727 cases of pneumonia, 126 (17.3%) were HCAP and 601 (82.7%) were community acquired. Compared with patients with community-acquired pneumonia, patients with HCAP were older (mean age, 69.5 vs 63.7 years; P < .001), had greater comorbidity (95.2% vs 74.7%; P < .001), and were more commonly classified into high-risk pneumonia severity index classes (67.5% vs 48.8%; P < .001). The most common causative organism was Streptococcus pneumoniae in both groups (27.8% vs 33.9%). Drug-resistant pneumococci were more frequently encountered in cases of HCAP. Legionella pneumophila was less common in patients with HCAP (2.4% vs 8.8%; P = .01). Aspiration pneumonia (20.6% vs 3.0%; P < .001), Haemophilus influenzae (11.9% vs 6.0%; P = .02), Staphylococcus aureus (2.4% vs 0%; P = .005), and gram-negative bacilli (4.0% vs 1.0%; P = .03) were more frequent in HCAP. Patients with HCAP more frequently received an initial inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (5.6% vs 2.0%; P = .03). The overall case-fatality rate (< 30 days) was higher in patients with HCAP (10.3% vs 4.3%; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: At present, a substantial number of patients initially seen with pneumonia in the emergency department have HCAP. These patients require a targeted approach when selecting empirical antibiotic therapy.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Comorbilidad , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/epidemiología , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA