Immunosuppressive and immunomodulating therapy for atopic dermatitis in pregnancy: an appraisal of the literature.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common dermatological diagnosis during pregnancy. Treatment of AD during pregnancy can be challenging, due to the unpredictable course and the fact that the therapy needs to be safe for both the mother and the fetus. Here we present an up-to-date appraisal of the literature on the treatment options available for AD in patients planning pregnancy, during pregnancy, and during breastfeeding. All patients with AD are recommended to supplement any medical treatment with daily applications of emollients. The first step in the medical treatment for AD during pregnancy are topical corticosteroids, and/or topical tacrolimus. If required, UV-light therapy can also be considered. Treatment with systemic therapy during pregnancy should always rely on a careful risk-benefit assessment and be based on shared-decision making between the treating physician and patient. The first-line systemic treatment option is cyclosporine A, whereas azathioprine may be considered in patients already receiving this treatment prior to pregnancy. Systemic glucocorticoids may also be used. Treatment with systemic JAK inhibitors is not recommended, whereas treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate is contraindicated. Targeted therapy with dupilumab is not generally recommended, due to lack of experience in human pregnancies, yet some case-reports on their use are emerging. These recommendations are based on the authors appraisal of existing literature and the current recommendation from the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. It is always the responsibility of the treating physician to stay updated on the newest guidelines and literature when treating patients with AD during pregnancy.

Assessment of Correlation between Dual-Energy Ct (De-Ct)-Derived Iodine Concentration and Local Flourodeoxyglucose (Fdg) Uptake in Patients with Primary Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

(1) The current literature contains several studies investigating the correlation between dual-energy-derived iodine concentration (IC) and positron emission tomography (PET)-derived Flourodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In previously published studies, either the entire tumor volume or a region of interest containing the maximum IC or 18F-FDG was assessed. However, the results have been inconsistent. The objective of this study was to correlate IC with FDG both within the entire volume and regional sub-volumes of primary tumors in patients with NSCLC. (2) In this retrospective study, a total of 22 patients with NSCLC who underwent both dual-energy CT (DE-CT) and 18F-FDG PET/CT were included. A region of interest (ROI) encircling the entire primary tumor was delineated, and a rigid registration of the DE-CT, iodine maps and FDG images was performed for the ROI. The correlation between tumor measurements and area-specific measurements of ICpeak and the peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak) was found. Finally, a correlation between tumor volume and the distance between SUVpeak and ICpeak centroids was found. (3) For the entire tumor, moderate-to-strong correlations were found between SUVmax and ICmax (R = 0.62, p = 0.002), and metabolic tumor volume vs. total iodine content (R = 0.91, p < 0.001), respectively. For local tumor sub-volumes, a negative correlation was found between ICpeak and SUVpeak (R = −0.58, p = 0.0046). Furthermore, a strong correlation was found between the tumor volume and the distance in millimeters between SUVpeak and ICpeak centroids (R = 0.81, p < 0.0001). (4) In patients with NSCLC, high FDG uptakes and high DE-CT-derived iodine concentrations correlated on a whole-tumor level, but the peak areas were positioned at different locations within the tumor. 18F-FDG PET/CT and DE-CT provide complementary information and might represent different underlying patho-physiologies.