Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 8 Suppl 1: S121-7, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15679257

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Between May 2002 and May 2004, eight French comprehensive cancer centres did a prospective nonrandomized study including 200 patients, 100 with cancer of the prostate and 100 with head and neck cancers. Half of each patient group was treated by IMRT and the others by RTC 3D. This clinical study was associated with an economic study and a physics study. We report here the first results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the clinical study, the analysis of the data of the first 88 patients irradiated for a prostatic cancer shows that 39 received RTC and 49 IMRT with a mean dose of 78 Gy at the ICRU point at 2 Gy per fraction. For H&N tumours, the preliminary analysis was done on the 87 first patients with a mean follow-up of 11.5 months (2 to 25 months) and a median of 8.4 months for the IMRT groups and 13.2 months for the RTC group. The economic study was done on the first 157 patients included during the first 18 months: 71 treated by RTC (35 for H&N and 36 for prostate) and 86 treated by IMRT (38 for H&N and 48 for prostate). The assessment of the direct costs was realized by a micro-costing technique. The physical study compared dose distributions for both techniques and has created quality control recommendations. RESULTS: Clinical studies of the acute reactions do not show any difference between groups, but we want to point out the short follow-up and the relatively high dose delivered to cancers of the prostate. The physics study demonstrates that IMRT is technically feasible in good clinical conditions with high quality assurance, a good reproducibility and precision. Dosimetric data show that IMRT could certainly spare organs at risk more than RTC for H&N tumours. The direct costs of "routine" treatments for H&N tumours were 4922 euros for IMRT versus 1899 euros for RTC and for the prostatic cancers 4911 euros for IMRT versus 2357 for RTC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Oído, Nariz y Garganta/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Oído, Nariz y Garganta/radioterapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia Conformacional/economía , Factores de Tiempo
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 15(2): 701-11, 1997 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9053496

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To conduct a multicenter phase II study of a concomitant combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by surgery, where feasible, in patients with nonmetastatic esophageal tumor, stratified on operability at diagnosis. METHODS: Each cycle consisted of fluorouracil (5FU) 800 mg/m2/d by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1 to 5, cisplatin (CDDP) 50 mg/m2/d IV bolus on days 1 and 8, hydroxyurea (HU) 1.5 or 2 g/d orally on days 8 to 12 and concomitant radiotherapy 20 Gy in 10 fractions over 12 days. All patients were to receive two cycles on days 1 and 22. If feasible, surgery was performed 3 to 6 weeks after cycle two completion. Otherwise, a third cycle was administered. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included between September 1990 and September 1993. Of the 47 operable patients, 41 (87%) underwent surgery and 38 (81%) had a complete resection. No residual primary tumor was found in the surgical specimen in 17 cases (36%), and only microscopic foci in 13 (28%). Two-year overall and disease-free survival probabilities were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 37 to 65) and 43% (95% CI, 28 to 57), respectively. Among the 41 inoperable patients, 12 (29%) became operable. Seven (17%) had complete resection, two incomplete resection, and three exploratory surgery. Two-year overall and disease-free survival probabilities were 29% (95% CI, 15 to 43) and 27% (95% CI, 13 to 40), respectively. Five deaths occurred during chemoradiotherapy, six postoperatively and four in patients with evidence of cancer. Five late complications (one myelopathy) were observed. CONCLUSION: Despite a high histologic response rate in initially operable patients, overall survival was similar to that observed in other preoperative chemoradiation series because of substantial toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hidroxiurea/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA