Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 186: 32-40, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29199010

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate low- vs high-dose plaque brachytherapy for juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. METHODS: Setting: Single institution. STUDY POPULATION: Forty-seven patients with juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma. INTERVENTION: Iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy. Eyes were divided into apex low-dose (LD) and high-dose (HD) groups (≤ or > median apex dose 84.35 Gy). Main outcome measures were time to distant failure, local failure, death, enucleation, radiation retinopathy, optic neuropathy, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Freedom from distant failure rates were 96% and 95% in apex LD and HD groups at 5 years and 77% and 95% at 10 years, respectively (P = .84). Freedom from local failure rates were 90% in the apex LD group vs 89% in the HD group at 5 and 10 years (P = .96). Apex LD and HD groups did not differ for time to death or enucleation. Five- and 10-year freedom from radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy rates were higher in the apex LD than HD group. Loss of ≥3 BCVA lines, final BCVA 20/40 or better, and final BCVA 20/200 or worse were more favorable in the 5 mm LD compared to HD group. Visual acuity outcomes did not differ between apex LD and HD groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy (67.5-81 Gy at tumor apex) provides safe and effective tumor control for juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma and may be associated with reduced radiation toxicity. Larger trials are needed to determine the optimal therapeutic dose for juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Coroides/radioterapia , Predicción , Radioisótopos de Yodo/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Agudeza Visual , Anciano , Biopsia , Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Coroides/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Disco Óptico/patología , Disco Óptico/efectos de la radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20305504

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of exposure in the immediate 3-month postoperative follow-up period with the rate of exposure after the immediate postoperative period in 419 anophthalmic patients with a bioceramic (aluminum oxide) orbital implant. METHODS: This is a retrospective, clinical case series of 419 patients who received a bioceramic orbital implant. All patients who presented to five oculofacial surgeons (D.J., S.G., J.D., S.K., L.M.) from January 1, 2000, to June 1, 2007, who received a bioceramic orbital implant and had a minimum of 3 months of follow-up were included in this study. The authors analyzed age, gender, type of surgery, implant size, peg system, follow-up duration, time of pegging, and problems encountered. The data from the patients with greater than 3 months of follow-up with exposure of the bioceramic implant are detailed in this report. RESULTS: There were 353 patients followed for 3 to 96 months with an average of 30 months of follow-up (median 23 months). Implant exposure occurred in 32/353 bioceramic implants (9.1%). Six of the 32 (19%) exposures occurred during the 90-day postoperative period (average 2.1 months). Twenty-six (81%) exposures occurred outside of the 90-day postoperative period (average 27.5 months, range 4-82 months). CONCLUSIONS: Implant exposures can occur anytime postimplant placement. This review discovered an implant exposure rate of 9.1%, with the majority of the exposures occurring after the postoperative follow-up period. Patients with porous orbital implants should be followed on a long-term basis to detect this complication.


Asunto(s)
Óxido de Aluminio , Materiales Biocompatibles , Órbita/cirugía , Implantes Orbitales , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Falla de Prótesis , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Enucleación del Ojo , Evisceración del Ojo , Ojo Artificial , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA