Quantifying ear-canal geometry with multiple computer-assisted tomographic scans.

Several audiological tests require knowledge of the sound-pressure spectrum at the eardrum. However, microphone readings are typically made at another, more-accessible position in the auditory canal. Recordings are then "adjusted" to the plane of the eardrum via mathematical models of the ear canal and eardrum. As bandwidths of audiological instruments have increased, ear-canal models have, by necessity, become more precise geometrically. Reported herein is a noninvasive procedure for acquiring geometry of the ear canal in fine detail. The method employs a computer-assisted tomographic (CAT) scanner in two steps to make radiographic images of parasagittal cross sections at uniform intervals along the lateral length of the canal. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing areas of cross sections appearing in radiographic images of a cadaver ear canal to cross sectional areas of corresponding michrotome slices of an injection mold of the same canal. Percent differences between these two areas had a mean value of 9.65% for 26 different cross sections of the one ear canal studied. Ear canal volume estimated from the CAT images was 6.12% different from the estimated volume of the injection mold: an improvement over the reported 39% maximum error of conventional acoustic volume measurements.

Effects of normal and pathologic eardrum impedance on sound pressure in the aided ear canal: a computer simulation.

Reported herein are results of computer simulations of aided sound spectra in ears with normal and pathologic eardrum impedance. The computer technique used in this study has been reported elsewhere [D. P. Egolf, D. R. Tree, and L. L. Feth, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 264-271 (1978)]. Consequently, to develop reader confidence in the computer scheme, its application to real ears was first tested. This was accomplished by (1) comparing computed spectral data with in-the-ear measurements and (2) comparing real ear minus 2-cc coupler data-both computer generated--with an idealized difference curve published elsewhere [R. M. Sachs and M. D. Burkhard, unpublished rep. no. 20022-1, Industrial Research Products, Inc., Elk Grove Village, IL (1972)]. Results indicate that the wide variation in eardrum impedance among normals evidenced in other studies produces a corresponding wide variation in aided spectrum shape. Likewise, simulations utilizing two sets of pathologic eardrum impedance data obtained from the literature show that aided sound spectra in such ears are likely to be significantly different from those occurring in normal ears. These findings suggest, as others have concluded, that there may be a substantial variation in spectrum shape among individuals wearing identically the same hearing aid--even if those individuals have normal hearing. In conclusion, questions are raised about the use of real-ear simulators and the need for a comprehensive computer-based model of an entire hearing aid.