Effect of Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone (1-84) on Resolution of Active Charcot Neuro-osteoarthropathy in Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: Fractures in Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN) often fail to heal despite prolonged immobilization with below-knee casting. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH) in reducing time to resolution of CN and healing of fractures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: People with diabetes and acute (active) Charcot foot were randomized (double-blind) to either full-length PTH (1-84) or placebo therapy, both in addition to below-knee casting and calcium and vitamin D3 supplementation. The primary outcome was resolution of CN, defined as a skin foot temperature difference >2°C at two consecutive monthly visits. RESULTS: Median time to resolution was 5 months (95% CI 4, 12) in intervention and 6 months (95% CI 2, 9) in control. On univariate mixed Cox and logistic regression, there was no significant difference in time to resolution between the groups (P = 0.64) or in the likelihood of resolution (P = 0.66). The hazard ratio of resolution was 0.84 (95% CI 0.41, 1.74; P = 0.64), and the odds ratio of resolution by 12 months was 0.80 (95% CI 0.3, 2.13; P = 0.66) (intervention vs. control). On linear regression analysis, there were no significant differences in the effect of treatment on fracture scores quantitated on MRI scans (coefficient 0.13 [95% CI -0.62, 0.88]; P = 0.73) and on foot and ankle X-rays (coefficient 0.30 [95% CI -0.03, 0.63]; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This double-blind placebo-controlled trial did not reduce time to resolution or enhance fracture healing of CN. There was no added benefit of daily intervention with PTH (1-84) to below-knee casting in achieving earlier resolution of CN.

Adherence to prescription guidelines for medical cannabis in disability claimants.

OBJECTIVE: To examine a case series of 70 disability claimants who were referred to a clinic for multidisciplinary medical evaluation for physician compliance with cannabis prescription guidelines for pre-existing cannabis prescriptions. DESIGN: Retrospective case series analysis. SETTING: A private clinic in New Brunswick specializing in multidisciplinary medical assessment for institutional third-party insurers. PARTICIPANTS: All referrals for independent review of cannabis prescriptions between May 2016 and February 2018 (N = 70). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with the cannabis prescription guidelines. RESULTS: Treating physicians were found to have not adhered to the guidelines in 53 of 61 patients (86.9%) who were prescribed cannabis products for pain management and in 8 of 9 patients (88.9%) who were prescribed cannabis products for treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical assessment and radiologic review failed to identify a neuropathic cause of pain in 70.5% of pain cases. Adequate trials of noncannabinoid medications had not been attempted for 72.1% of patients with pain nor for any of the patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Contraindications to cannabis were identified in 65.7% of cases, including evidence suggesting a past or present cannabis use disorder or currently active substance use disorder in 34.3% of cases. The prescriptions were found to be consistent with prescription guidelines in just 12.9% of cases. CONCLUSION: Very few of the reviewed cannabis prescriptions were found to be consistent with cannabis prescription guidelines. Respectful attention to guidelines might avoid unwarranted overprescribing, limit the secondary increase in comorbidity, and facilitate future scientific study and evaluation of medical cannabis.