ACUTE RETINAL NECROSIS: Difference in Outcome by Viral Type and Options for Antiviral Therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate differences in outcomes of acute retinal necrosis with confirmed viral polymerase chain reaction between viral types and highlight different treatment options. METHODS: The study evaluated 22 eyes in 18 patients of polymerase chain reaction-positive acute retinal necrosis at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2007 to 2018. Outcome measures included final visual acuity, treatment paradigms, and retinal detachment rate. RESULTS: Eight eyes were polymerase chain reaction-positive for varicella zoster virus, two eyes for herpes simplex virus Type 1 (HSV-1), and 12 eyes for herpes simplex virus Type 2 (HSV-2). Final Snellen best-corrected visual acuity averaged 20/51 for varicella zoster virus, 20/25 for HSV-1, and 20/814 for HSV-2. Retinal detachment occurred in 2 (25%) of varicella zoster virus eyes and 8 (75%) of HSV-2 eyes. One eye with HSV-1 and three eyes with HSV-2 received cidofovir for treatment of refractory retinitis. CONCLUSION: Acute retinal necrosis secondary to HSV-2 tended to have persistent active retinitis with a higher rate of retinal detachment despite similar treatment protocols, suggesting that in some cases combination intravenous acyclovir and adjuvant intravitreal foscarnet injections are not sufficient. Despite the risk of renal toxicity, intravenous cidofovir may be a consideration in select patients.

Yellow corneal ring associated with vitamin supplementation for age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To report the first described cases of peripheral yellow corneal rings secondary to vitamin supplementation for age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). DESIGN: Retrospective single-center case series. PARTICIPANTS: The eyes of 4 patients taking vitamin supplementation for ARMD were examined at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Department of Ophthalmology between January 2010 and April 2011. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 4 patients with peripheral corneal rings receiving vitamin supplementation for ARMD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of peripheral yellow corneal rings, skin findings, and serum carotene levels. RESULTS: Each patient had circumferential, yellow, peripheral corneal rings and exhibited subtle yellowing of the skin most notable on the palms. Serum carotene levels were normal in 2 of the 3 patients and markedly elevated in the last patient in whom it was measured. CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear at this time how to counsel patients with this ocular finding. We suspect that these rings are more common than generally appreciated because they may have a subtle appearance or be misdiagnosed as arcus senilis. We suggest that a formal study be performed on a cohort of patients taking vitamin supplementation for macular degeneration that specifically screens for yellow rings and measures serum carotene levels when they are identified.