Challenges in Implementing Guideline on Integrative Oncology and Pain: The Israeli Perspective.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the feasibility of implementing the joint guideline on integrative medicine for pain management in oncology, published by the Society for Integrative Oncology (SIO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), for integrative oncology (IO) services in supportive and palliative care. METHODS: A qualitative research methodology was co-designed by the SIO-ASCO guideline committee, with the Society for Complementary Medicine, Israel Medical Association (IMA). A questionnaire with five open-ended questions exploring barriers and enablers to implementing the guideline was distributed to chairs and board members of nine IMA-affiliated medical societies; four deans of Israeli medical schools; and nurses from the Israeli Society for Oncology Nursing. Respondent narratives were qualitatively analyzed using ATLAS.Ti software for systematic coding. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 52 physicians and nurses from medical oncology, hematology, gynecological oncology, pediatric oncology, palliative medicine, pain, family medicine, internal medicine, and integrative medicine. The SIO-ASCO guidelines were endorsed by nine IMA-affiliated societies. The domains identified included the importance of guideline implementation in clinical practice; barriers and facilitators to implementation; practical aspects required for this implementation (e.g., IO training); clinical indications for referral; budget-related issues; and clinical and administrative models enabling practical implementation of the guideline. CONCLUSION: We found across-the-board consensus among the nine IMA-affiliated societies supporting the current guideline. This, while identifying potential facilitators and barriers in order to address the implementation of the SIO-ASCO guideline recommendations.

Prevalence and clinical significance of hypercalcemia at diagnosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The reported prevalence of hypercalcemia at diagnosis in non-Hodgkin-lymphoma ranges between 1.3% and 7.4%. These studies included all patients, regardless of lymphoma subtype. We performed a retrospective case-control study to determine the prevalence of hypercalcemia at time of diagnosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Among 250 newly diagnosed patients, 46 (18%) had hypercalcemia. When compared with age-sex matched patients and normal calcium levels, those with hypercalcemia had higher levels of LDH, lower levels of albumin and more advanced stage. These differences were translated to shorter progression-free-survival and overall survival, but only in patients with hypercalcemia and low levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH). These findings suggest that in newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL, hypercalcemia is more frequent than previously appreciated. Furthermore, lymphoma-related but not primary hyperparathyroidism-related hypercalcemia is associated with adverse prognostic factors and adverse clinical outcomes in DLBCL. Hence, PTH should be obtained in patients with DLBCL and hypercalcemia at diagnosis.