RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Diet has a major influence on the formation and management of kidney stones. However, kidney stone formers' diet is difficult to capture in a large population. Our objective was to describe the dietary intake of kidney stone formers in Switzerland and to compare it to nonstone formers. METHODS: We used data from the Swiss Kidney Stone Cohort (n = 261), a multicentric cohort of recurrent or incident kidney stone formers with additional risk factors, and a control group of computed tomography-scan proven nonstone formers (n = 197). Dieticians conducted two consecutive 24-h dietary recalls, using structured interviews and validated software (GloboDiet). We took the mean consumption per participant of the two 24-h dietary recalls to describe the dietary intake and used two-part models to compare the two groups. RESULTS: The dietary intake was overall similar between stone and nonstone formers. However, we identified that kidney stone formers had a higher probability of consuming cakes and biscuits (odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 1.56[1.03; 2.37]) and soft drinks (OR = 1.66[1.08; 2.55]). Kidney stone formers had a lower probability of consuming nuts and seeds (OR = 0.53[0.35; 0.82]), fresh cheese (OR = 0.54[0.30; 0.96]), teas (OR = 0.50[0.3; 0.84]), and alcoholic beverages (OR = 0.35[0.23; 0.54]), especially wine (OR = 0.42[0.27; 0.65]). Furthermore, among consumers, stone formers reported smaller quantities of vegetables (ß coeff[95% CI] = - 0.23[- 0.41; - 0.06]), coffee (ß coeff = - 0.21[- 0.37; - 0.05]), teas (ß coeff = - 0.52[- 0.92; - 0.11]) and alcoholic beverages (ß coeff = - 0.34[- 0.63; - 0.06]). CONCLUSION: Stone formers reported lower intakes of vegetables, tea, coffee, and alcoholic beverages, more specifically wine, but reported drinking more frequently soft drinks than nonstone formers. For the other food groups, stone formers and nonformers reported similar dietary intakes. Further research is needed to better understand the links between diet and kidney stone formation and develop dietary recommendations adapted to the local settings and cultural habits.
Asunto(s)
Café , Cálculos Renales , Humanos , Suiza , Cálculos Renales/epidemiología , Dieta , Factores de Riesgo , VerdurasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypocitraturia and hypercalciuria are the most prevalent risk factors in kidney stone formers (KSFs). Citrate supplementation has been introduced for metaphylaxis in KSFs. However, beyond its effects on urinary parameters and stone recurrence, only a few studies have investigated the impact of citrate on other metabolic pathways such as glucose or lipid metabolism. METHODS: We performed an observational study using data from the Swiss Kidney Stone Cohort. Patients were subdivided into two groups based on treatment with potassium citrate or not. The outcomes were changes of urinary risk parameters, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting glucose, cholesterol and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Hypocitraturia was present in 19.3% of 428 KSFs and potassium citrate was administered to 43 patients (10.0%) at a mean dosage of 3819 ± 1796 mg/day (corresponding to 12.5 ± 5.9 mmol/ day). Treatment with potassium citrate was associated with a significantly higher mean change in urinary citrate (P = 0.010) and urinary magnesium (P = 0.020) compared with no potassium citrate treatment. Exogenous citrate administration had no effect on cholesterol, fasting glucose, HbA1c and BMI. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated no significant association of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2 D3] levels with urinary citrate excretion. CONCLUSION: Potassium citrate supplementation in KSFs in Switzerland resulted in a beneficial change of the urinary risk profile by particularly increasing anti-lithogenic factors. Fasting glucose, HbA1c, cholesterol levels and BMI were unaffected by potassium citrate therapy after 3 months, suggesting that potassium citrate is safe and not associated with unfavourable metabolic side effects. Lastly, 1,25(OH)2 D3 levels were not associated with urinary citrate excretion.
RESUMEN
With the number of migrants and refugees increasing globally, the nephrology community is increasingly confronted with issues relating to the management of end-stage kidney disease in this population, including medical, logistical, financial, and moral-ethical questions. Beginning with data for the state of affairs regarding refugees in Europe and grounded in moral reasoning theory, this Policy Forum Perspective contends that to improve care for this specific population, there is a need for: (1) clear demarcations of responsibilities across the societal (macro), local (meso), and individual (micro) levels, such that individual providers are aware of available resources and able to provide essential medical care while societies and local communities determine the general approach to dialysis care for refugees; (2) additional data and evidence to facilitate decision making based on facts rather than emotions; and (3) better information and education in a broad sense (cultural sensitivity, legal rights and obligations, and medical knowledge) to address specific needs in this population. Although the nephrology community cannot leverage a change in the geopolitical framework, we are in a position to generate accurate data describing the dimensions of care of refugee or migrant patients with end-stage kidney disease to advocate for a holistic approach to treatment for this unique patient population.