All-oral combination of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: an International Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: This multicentre, international phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of a first-line combination of oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Patients with measurable, HER2-negative disease received, as a first line in metastatic setting, 3-weekly cycles of oral vinorelbine 80 mg m(-2) (after a first cycle at 60) on day 1 and day 8, plus capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) (750 if >or=65 years of age) twice daily, on days 1-14. Treatment was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were enrolled and 54 were treated (median age: 58.5 years). Most (78%) had visceral involvement and 63% had received earlier (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The objective response rate (RECIST) in 49 evaluable patients was 51% (95% confidence interval (CI), 36-66), including complete response in 4%. The clinical benefit rate (response or stable disease for >or=6 months) was 63% (95% CI, 48-77). The median duration of response was 7.2 months (95% CI, 6.4-10.2). After a median follow-up of 41 months, median progression-free survival was 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.8-9.7) and median overall survival was 29.2 months (95% CI, 18.2-40.1). Treatment-related adverse events were manageable, the main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropaenia (49%); two patients experienced febrile neutropaenia and three patients had a neutropaenic infection (including one septic death). A particularly low rate of alopaecia was observed. CONCLUSION: These results show that the all-oral combination of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated first-line regimen for MBC.

Long-term quality of life in premenopausal women with node-negative localized breast cancer treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy.

Our purpose was to evaluate the late physical and psychosocial difficulties of premenpausal patients treated for a localized breast cancer and to weigh the impact of chemotherapy on long-term quality of life. Two self-administered questionnaires, the EORTC core QLQ-C30 and the breast module (BR23) were mailed to 179 premenopausal node-negative women continuously disease-free, previously enrolled in a trial testing the efficacy of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy (Espié et al, 1997). The core questionnaire evaluates the physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning and global health status. The breast module includes four functional scales: body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment and future perspective. It also includes symptom scales such as arm or breast symptoms. Some specific professional and social states were added. 119 (68%) patients (mean age 54 years, range 30-69) participated. Mean follow-up time since diagnosis was 9.6 years (4-16). 68% had conservative and 32% radical surgery (with reconstructive surgery in 50%). CMF was given to 77 (65%) patients. Irradiation was administered in 75% of patients irrespective of adjuvant therapy. QLQ-C30 scale scores were similar in patients who had or had not received chemotherapy. Disturbance in body image, sex life and breast symptoms did not differ between patients who had or had not received adjuvant CMF. No major socioprofessional difficulties were reported except problems in borrowing from banks not related to past chemotherapy. With long follow-up, most premenopausal women treated for a localized breast cancer cope with the disease and its treatments. Adjuvant CMF chemotherapy does not appear to impair quality of life nor social and professional life in these patients.

Optimizing chemotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Chemotherapy is offered to almost all patients with metastatic breast cancer. Optimization of treatment has four major goals: (1) To improve access to chemotherapy. Orally active chemotherapy is an attractive option for those patients when access to hospital is limited by financial considerations, long journeys or patient reluctance. In the past, only alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, melphalan) could be administered orally. The activity (first- and second-line) of Xeloda (capecitabine) with limited side effects and the development of oral vinorelbine and anthracyclines should improve access to chemotherapy and also concentrate further interest on treatment with long-term administration of cytotoxic agents. (2) To improve response rates and duration in first-line treatment. Response rates have been increased by the use of combinations of taxoids and anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents and/or fluoropyrimidines (>60-70% with complete remission in 10-15% of patients). There is increasing interest in sequential use of active agents or combinations at their optimal doses. Nevertheless, such 'induction regimen' fail to prolong response duration (rarely longer than 9-12 months). The use of less-toxic maintenance chemotherapy regimens increases response duration and disease-free survival. Such maintenance regimens could be used on an outpatient basis and will be further simplified by the availability of active oral agents such as the novel fluoropyrimidine Xeloda. (3) To increase cure rates. This can only be considered with first-line treatment in selected patients (long disease-free interval, minimal number of visceral sites and ability to tolerate high-dose chemotherapy). The completed studies with high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell support have, in fact, shown only a minimal effect on cure rates. Incorporation of very active agents such as taxoids and use of multicycle high-dose therapy may improve these results. (4) To offer alternative active regimens in second and subsequent metastatic progression. Taxoids, vinorelbine and, more recently, Xeloda all achieve a 20-40% response rate in these situations. The reintroduction of agents previously used for adjuvant or first-line therapy can also be considered.

Phase II trial of a combination of vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of a combination (CT) chemotherapy of Vinorelbine (VNB), Cyclophosphamide (CPA) and 5-Fluorouracil (FU) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Forty five women with measurable or evaluable metastatic, locoregionally advanced or relapsing breast cancer have entered the study. Thirty eight patients were not exposed to treatment other than adjuvant CT while 5 were heavily pretreated. Treatment consisted of VNB 25 mg/m2 by rapid i.v. infusion d1 and d3, CPA 600 mg/m2 i.v. as VNB, d2 and 5FU 750 mg/m2/d 1-3 in continuous i.v. infusion. The treatment was repeated every 21 days up to 6 courses if response or stability were obtained. RESULTS: Forty three patients (38 in first line for advanced disease) were evaluable for response and tolerance. The overall response rate (UICC criteria) was 51% (95%; CI: 36-65%) with 12 and 39% CR and PR respectively, while an additional 33% had stable disease. The response and stability rate were similar in first and second line treated patients. Responses were observed in all sites while a well documented 50% partial response rate of bone metastases was noted. Median time to progression in first line treated patients was 10.5+ months Median overall survival has not yet been reached; however 61% of patients are alive after a 26 months median follow-up. A total of 236 courses has been administered. The main toxicity was neutropenia (88%) with only 3 cases with dose reduction and one withdrawal. Serious non-hematologic toxicity was limited to 3 cases of GIII mucositis. Digestive toxicity (88% G I-II), diarrhea (7% GI), constipation (19% G I-III), peripheral neuropathy (14% GI-II) and alopecia (42% GI-IV) were also noted but remained controllable. No toxic deaths were registered. CONCLUSION: The combination of VNB, CPA and SFU in advanced or metastatic breast cancer yields a response rate, response duration and survival rate comparable to anthracycline--as well as VNB-containing combinations while maintaining a low toxicity profile. Although CPA seems to be a minor contributor to the efficacy of this regimen, further evaluation should identify the value of this combination, particularly in candidates for heavy chemotherapy breast cancer patients.

Is p53 a protein that predicts the response to chemotherapy in node negative breast cancer?

The role of p53 in modulating apoptosis has suggested that it may affect efficacy of anti cancer agents. For this reason, we have evaluated p53 alterations in 282 consecutive patients with infiltrating node-negative breast cancer who underwent primary surgery and were randomized either to CMF (Cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2, Fluorouracil 400 mg/m2, and Methotrexate 40 mg/m2) or control arm (no adjuvant therapy) from 1980 to 1989. p53 alterations were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using DO7 MoAb, revealed by immunoperoxidase technique, and quantitated in term of percentage of positive cells. We observed a positive staining in 24% of the tumors. Among them, 10% had a positive staining in more than 75% of the cells. There was a highly significant association between the proportion of positive cells and histologic grade of the infiltrating ductal carcinomas (p<0.004). However, there was no association with age, tumor size, hormone receptor content, or vascular embolism. There was a trend but no significant relationship between positive staining and overall survival either in each arm of the trial or in the overall population. Interestingly, we observed a higher relative risk of local relapse after conservative therapy in the boosted area in the group of mutated p53 (RR=4.41; p<0.0005). We conclude that, in this node-negative breast tumor population, alteration of p53 cannot predict the response to the chemotherapy. However, it may represent a useful marker of risk of local relapse and of radio resistance.

Efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine and fluorouracil combination as first-line chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer: results of a phase II study using a sequential group method.

PURPOSE: To assess the antitumor efficacy and safety profile of the combination of Fluorouracil (5FU) and vinorelbine given as first-line therapy to patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As defined in the seven consecutive steps of a phase II group sequential design, 63 patients received 5FU 750 mg/m2/d for 5 consecutive days as a continuous infusion and vinorelbine 30 mg/ m2 on days 1 and 5 as a short intravenous (I/V) infusion every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-one of 63 patients achieved an objective response, which allowed us to discontinue the study and reject a response rate less than 50% with a statistical power of 90%. The unbiased estimate of the response rate was 61.6%. Response rate did not differ significantly according to the following: (1) type of prior adjuvant therapy (none, n = 23; without anthracycline, n = 6; with anthracyline, n = 34); (2) site of metastatic disease; and (3) number of metastatic sites. The median time to progression was 8.4 months. The median response duration was 12.3 months, and the median duration of complete response (CR), from the first assessment of CR, was 7.3 months. The median overall survival time was 23 months (28.1 months for patients with a CR). The main toxicities (grades 3 and 4) were neutropenia (90% of patients), infection (12.7%), mucositis (37%), and constipation (9.5%). Nevertheless, treatment could be given on an outpatient basis to the majority of patients, and the median relative dose-intensity was 86%. CONCLUSION: This phase II study, which used a group-sequential design, shows that the combination of 5FU and vinorelbine is an active and tolerable regimen for the treatment of first metastatic progression of breast cancer. It provides an alternative regimen for patients who have previously received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy or in whom anthracyclines cannot be used.

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. The International Collaborative Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a combination chemotherapy regimen that contains epirubicin (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide [FEC]) is superior to the standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) combination in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The International Collaborative Cancer Group (ICCG) conducted a large randomized trial in which two alternative schedules were used according to participating center: CMF1 versus FEC1 and CMF2 versus FEC2. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-nine patients were entered onto the trial. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, no significant benefit for the anthracycline-containing regimen was observed in terms of relapse-free (P = .61) or overall survival (P = .13). FEC1 and CMF1 appear to be of similar efficacy, but there is a suggestion that FEC2 may be superior to CMF2, since patients who received FEC2 had improved overall (P = .02) and relapse-free survival (P = .03) rates. Nausea and vomiting and alopecia were more common in the epirubicin-containing regimen (P = .001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the FEC2 regimen, in which epirubicin replaced the methotrexate in CMF, is the preferable adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for premenopausal patients with operable axillary node-positive breast cancer.

[Prevention of breast cancer: what are the other possibilities under study besides tamoxifen chemoprevention?]. / La prévention du cancer du sein: quelles sont les autres possibilités actuellement à l'étude en dehors de la chimioprévention par le tamoxifène?

Tamoxifen and retinoids are actually studied for breast cancer chemoprevention. The role of fat intake, vitamins, selenium, alcohol consumption and progestins are reviewed in view of prevention trials.

Advances in vinca-alkaloids: Navelbine.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine) is a new semisynthetic vinca alkaloid which chemically differs from vinblastine by substitutions on the catharantine moiety of the molecule. It has shown promising experimental antitumor activity against experimental murine tumors as well as continuous cell lines of human neoplastic origin and human tumor xenografts in nude mice. Acute subacute and chronic toxicity extensively studied in rodents, dogs and primate has shown that hematotoxicity was almost the sole side-effect; neurotoxicity appears very limited. Almost exclusive affinity of NVB for mitotic tubulin and tubulin associated protein accounts for this pattern of toxicity. Phase I and II studies have been conducted in humans. Dose limiting side-effect appears to be neutropenia: the drug is slightly emetogenic, induces little alopecia, almost no neurotoxicity, and no other toxicity. Although preliminary, results of phase II studies already suggest significant activity of NVB in non small lung cancer (33% response rate in 78 evaluable patients), advanced breast cancer (53% response rate in 33 pts without significant chemotherapy for the target progression) and Hodgkin's disease (90% response rate after 4 weekly courses in 31 pts). Thus extensive pharmacological studies and ongoing clinical studies confirm that chemical modifications of the catharantine moiety of vinca alcaloid can lead to active agents with broader spectrum of activity and easily manageable side effects.