Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: The SANLARS Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sacral neuromodulation might be effective to palliate low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery, but robust evidence is not available. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of sacral neuromodulation on low anterior resection syndrome symptoms as measured by validated scores and bowel diaries. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, 2-phased, controlled, multicenter crossover trial (NCT02517853). SETTINGS: Three tertiary hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients with major low anterior resection syndrome 12 months after transit reconstruction after rectal resection who had failed conservative treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent an advanced test phase by stimulation for 3 weeks and received the pulse generator implant if a 50% reduction in low anterior resection syndrome score was achieved. These patients entered the randomized phase in which the generator was left active or inactive for 4 weeks. After a 2-week washout, the sequence was changed. After the crossover, all generators were left activated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was low anterior resection syndrome score reduction. Secondary outcomes included continence and bowel symptoms. RESULTS: After testing, 35 of 46 patients (78%) had a 50% or greater reduction in low anterior resection syndrome score. During the crossover phase, all patients showed a reduction in scores and improved symptoms, with better performance if the generator was active. At 6- and 12-month follow-up, the mean reduction in low anterior resection syndrome score was -6.2 (95% CI -8.97 to -3.43; p < 0.001) and -6.97 (95% CI -9.74 to -4.2; p < 0.001), with St. Mark's continence score -7.57 (95% CI -9.19 to -5.95, p < 0.001) and -8.29 (95% CI -9.91 to -6.66; p < 0.001). Urgency, bowel emptiness sensation, and clustering episodes decreased in association with quality-of-life improvement at 6- and 12-month follow-up. LIMITATIONS: The decrease in low anterior resection syndrome score with neuromodulation was underestimated because of an unspecific measuring instrument. There was a possible carryover effect in sham stimulation sequence. CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation provides symptoms and quality-of-life amelioration, supporting its use in low anterior resection syndrome. See Video Abstract . NEUROMODULACIN SACRA EN PACIENTES CON SNDROME DE RESECCIN ANTERIOR BAJA ENSAYO CLNICO ALEATORIZADO SANLARS: ANTECEDENTES:La neuromodulación sacra podría ser eficaz para paliar el síndrome de resección anterior baja después de la cirugía de cáncer de recto, pero no hay pruebas sólidas disponibles.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el impacto de la neuromodulación sacra en los síntomas del síndrome de resección anterior baja, medido mediante puntuaciones validadas y diarios intestinales.DISEÑO:Ensayo cruzado multicéntrico, controlado, aleatorizado, doble ciego, de dos fases (NCT02517853).LUGARES:Tres hospitales terciarios.PACIENTES:Pacientes con puntuación de resección anterior baja importante, 12 meses después de la reconstrucción del tránsito después de la resección rectal en quienes había fracasado el tratamiento conservador.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes se sometieron a una fase de prueba avanzada mediante estimulación durante tres semanas y se les implantó el generador de impulsos si se lograba una reducción del 50% en la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja, ingresando a la fase aleatorizada en la que el generador se dejaba activo o inactivo durante cuatro semanas. Después de observar por 2 semanas, se cambió la secuencia. Después del cruce, todos los generadores quedaron activados.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la reducción de la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron continencia y síntomas intestinales.RESULTADOS:Después de las pruebas, 35 de 46 pacientes (78%) tuvieron una reducción ≥50% en la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja. Durante el cruce, todos los pacientes mostraron una reducción en las puntuaciones y una mejora de los síntomas, con un mejor rendimiento si el generador estaba activo. A los 6 y 12 meses de seguimiento, la reducción media en la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja fue -6,2 (-8,97; -3,43; p < 0,001) y -6,97 (-9,74; -4,2; p < 0,001), con Puntuación de continencia de St. Mark's -7,57 (-9,19; -5,95, p < 0,001) y -8,29 (-9,91; -6,66; p < 0,001). La urgencia, la sensación de vacío intestinal y los episodios de agrupamiento disminuyeron en asociación con una mejora en la calidad de vida a los 6 y 12 meses de seguimiento.LIMITACIONES:La disminución en la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja con neuromodulación se subestimó debido a un instrumento de medición no específico. Posible efecto de arrastre en la secuencia de estimulación simulada.CONCLUSIONES:La neuromodulación mejora los síntomas y la calidad de vida, lo que respalda su uso en el síndrome de resección anterior baja. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Preoperative oral antibiotics and surgical-site infections in colon surgery (ORALEV): a multicentre, single-blind, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics can reduce the incidence of surgical-site infections, but no randomised controlled trial has assessed oral antibiotics alone without mechanical bowel preparation. The aim of this study was to determine whether prophylaxis with oral antibiotics the day before elective colon surgery affects the incidence of postoperative surgical-site infections. METHODS: In this multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (ORALEV), patients undergoing colon surgery were recruited from five major hospitals in Spain and 47 colorectal surgeons at these hospitals participated. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with neoplasia or diverticular disease and if a partial colon resection or total colectomy was indicated. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using online randomisation tables to either administration of oral antibiotics the day before surgery (experimental group) or no administration of oral antibiotics before surgery (control group). For the experimental group, ciprofloxacin 750 mg was given every 12 h (two doses at 1200 h and 0000 h) and metronidazole 250 mg every 8 h (three doses at 1200 h, 1800 h, and 0000 h) the day before surgery. All patients were given intravenous cefuroxime 1·5 g and metronidazole 1 g at the time of anaesthetic induction. The primary outcome was incidence of surgical-site infections. Patients were followed up for 1 month after surgery and all postsurgical complications were registered. This study was registered with EudraCT, 2014-002345-21, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02505581, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between May 2, 2015, and April 15, 2017, we assessed 582 patients for eligibility, of whom 565 were eligible and randomly assigned to receive either no oral antibiotics (n=282) or oral antibiotics (n=282) before surgery. 13 participants in the control group and 16 in the experimental group were subsequently excluded; 269 participants in the control group and 267 in the experimental group received their assigned intervention. The incidence of surgical-site infections in the control group (30 [11%] of 269) was significantly higher than in the experimental group (13 [5%] of 267; χ2 test p=0·013). Oral antibiotics were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of surgical-site infections compared with no oral antibiotics (odds ratio 0·41, 95% CI 0·20-0·80; p=0·008). More complications (including surgical-site infections) were observed in the control group than in the experimental group (76 [28%] vs 51 [19%]; p=0·017), although there was no difference in severity as assessed by Clavien-Dindo score. No differences were noted between groups in terms of local complications, surgical complications, or medical complications that were not related to septic complications. INTERPRETATION: The administration of oral antibiotics as prophylaxis the day before colon surgery significantly reduces the incidence of surgical-site infections without mechanical bowel preparation and should be routinely adopted before elective colon surgery. FUNDING: Fundación Asociación Española de Coloproctología.

Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether patients that underwent ultra-low rectal resection for cancer can benefit from the recently reintroduced two-stage Turnbull-Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through procedure. METHODS: Patients with low rectal tumors undergoing radical sphincter-sparing resection are eligible for inclusion in a randomized multicenter study. Whether two-stage Turnbull-Cutait coloanal anastomosis provides significant benefits over hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis and associated lateral ileostomy in terms of postoperative morbidity is the primary endpoint. In addition, the study aims to assess secondary endpoints such as quality of life, fecal incontinence, and locoregional recurrence of the neoplasm. Patients with adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum diagnosed by rigid proctoscopy, with histological confirmation of malignancy, and who are candidates of rectal removal and coloanal anastomosis will be included in a randomized controlled and multicenter trial. Postoperative morbidity is defined as complications that occur within 30 days of the data of the second surgical procedure of the last patient included in the trial. Patients will be followed for a minimum period of 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The two-stage Turnbull-Cutait coloanal anastomosis may constitute an effective surgical alternative in the current approach to the treatment of low rectal cancer without the need of a temporary loop colostomy, preventing the wide range of complications related to stoma surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial number: NCT01766661). This trial is registered in January 10, 2013.

Manejo quirúrgico del estreñimiento crónico grave / Surgical management of severe chronic constipation

No disponible