Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The use of biologic therapies for the management of knee osteoarthritis has increased, despite insufficient evidence of efficacy. Our aim was to complete a systematic review and analysis of reports utilizing the highest level-of-evidence evaluating: (1) platelet-rich plasma injections (PRPs); (2) bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs); (3) adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs); and (4) amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies evaluating PRP injections, BMSCs, ADSCs, and AMSCs in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Of 1009 studies identified within the last 5 years, 123 met inclusion criteria. A comprehensive analysis of all levels-of-evidence was performed, as well as separate analysis on level-of-evidence I studies. Level-of-evidence was determined by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons classification system. RESULTS: Although the majority of PRP reports demonstrated improvements in pain and/or function, others revealed no substantial improvements. Similar findings were noted for BMSCs, ADSCs, and AMSCs. Assessments of BMSC studies yielded majority with positive clinical results, although short-lived. Studies on ADSCs revealed improved clinical outcomes, but equivocal radiographic outcomes. Studies evaluating AMSCs demonstrated improvements in pain and function, and decreased radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Despite some promising early results for PRP, BMSC, ADSC, and AMSC therapies, the majority of level-of-evidence I studies have multiple problems: small sample sizes, potentially inappropriate control cohorts, short-term follow-up, and so on. Despite the limitations, there still appears to be evidence justifying their use for knee osteoarthritis management. More high-level, larger human studies utilizing standardized protocols are needed.

Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation During Physical Therapy May Reduce the Incidence of Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrofibrosis remains a major complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that negatively impacts patient outcomes and exhausts healthcare resources. The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has demonstrated the ability to facilitate quadriceps muscle recovery and reduce pain. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare TKA patients who received physical therapy (PT) and adjuvant NMES therapy versus physical therapy alone in terms of: 1) rates of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) to treat arthrofibrosis; and 2) post-therapy range of motion (ROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of TKA patients from multiple institutions who underwent physical therapy versus physical therapy and adjuvant NMES therapy following primary TKA. A total of 206 patients were reviewed in the two cohorts that either received PT alone (n=86) or PT and adjuvant NMES therapy (n=120). Data regarding the requirement of MUA postoperatively for treatment of arthrofibrosis were collected for every patient. Additionally, pre- and post-therapy knee ROM data was also collected. Outcomes in both cohorts were then compared and analyzed. RESULTS: Lower rates of arthrofibrosis requiring MUA were recorded in patients who used NMES therapy and PT when compared to PT alone (7.5% vs. 19.8%; p=0.009). Log regression analysis revealed lower odds of needing MUA in patients who utilized NMES therapy in adjunct with PT (odds ratio [OR]=0.36; 95% CI: 0.115 to 0.875; p=0.023). Patients who received the NMES therapy were shown to have a statistically greater mean improvement in ROM when compared to those patients who did not receive NMES (+2.63, p=0.04). Log regression analysis also demonstrated that post-PT ROM decreased the odds of receiving MUA with a larger ROM (OR=92; 95% CI: 0.824 to 0.9855; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the use of NMES during PT may reduce the incidence of arthrofibrosis and improve patient ROM. Prospective, randomized controlled, and larger-scale studies are needed to validate these results. Nevertheless, this novel report demonstrated the positive outcomes for a new application of the NMES therapy.

Impact of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on 90-Day Episode Costs and Post-Acute Care Utilization in Total Knee Replacement Patients with Disuse Atrophy.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated differences in: 1) total episode payments, 2) probability of hospital readmission, 3) probability of inpatient rehab facility (IRF) and utilization, and 4) probability of skilled nursing care facility (SNF) utilization in patients who had disuse atrophy and underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and either did, or did not, receive preoperative home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Medicare limited dataset for a 5% sample of beneficiaries from 2014 and 2015 to construct episodes-of-care for TKA (DRG-470) patients with disuse atrophy who underwent a TKA during the 30 days prior to hospital admission and 90 days post-discharge. Patients were stratified into those who either did or did not receive pre- and postoperative NMES therapy. An ordinary least square (OLS) model was used to estimate the impact of NMES on total episode. Linear probability models were used to estimate the impact of NMES on SNF or IRF utilization and readmission. RESULTS: A $3,274 reduction in episode payments for patients who used preoperative NMES versus those who did not (p<0.001) was demonstrated. The probability of readmission was 12.7% lower for those who used preoperative NMES therapy versus those who did not (p=0.609). The probability of utilizing IRF and SNF was 56.7% (p=0.061) and 46.4% (p=<0.001) lower for those who used pre- and postoperative NMES versus those who did not, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant reduction in total episode payments and SNF utilization for TKA patients with disuse atrophy who had NMES therapy was demonstrated.