Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and oxytocin secretion from the hypothalamus in vitro during pro-oestrus: the effects of time of day and melatonin.

An accurately timed surge of luteinizing hormone (LH), during the second half of the day of pro-oestrus in rats, is a crucial part of the endocrine signal that leads to expulsion of an ovum from an ovarian follicle. LH release is partly controlled by a number of peptides, including gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and oxytocin, which travel from the hypothalamus to the pituitary. The profile of secretion of these peptides is poorly understood. Therefore, the amounts of GnRH and oxytocin that were secreted from hypothalamic explants were determined at several time points during the day of pro-oestrus. Basal secretion of oxytocin from hypothalami taken later in pro-oestrus was greater than from hypothalami taken earlier in the day (p < 0.02). On the other hand, basal secretion of GnRH decreased during the day of pro-oestrus (p < 0.03). The different trends of GnRH and oxytocin secretion reveal that their secretion is regulated by distinct mechanisms. GnRH secretion was higher at midpro-oestrus than late in the day (o < 0.05) consistent with a peak of GnRH having been observed by others in portal blood in the second half of the day of pro-oestrus. Responsiveness of oxytocin to stimulation by K+ of the hypothalami declined from the early light hours to the evening dark hours (p < 0.02). Thus, oxytocin modulation might be achieved partly by modification of intracellular processes. Melatonin, secreted during hours of darkness, is frequently involved in modulating time-dependent events in mammals, but its contribution to peptide regulation during the ovulatory cycle is unclear. Melatonin was observed to inhibit basal oxytocin secretion from hypothalami collected during light hours (p < 0.05). The investigation has, therefore, revealed the potential for melatonin to modulate peptide secretion from the hypothalamus during the day of pro-oestrus. We also observed that secretion from the hypothalamus of the two LH-regulating peptides, GnRH and oxytocin, are differently regulated during the day of pro-oestrus.

Modulation of gonadotropin levels by peptides acting at the anterior pituitary gland.

There are several lines of evidence that point to peptides participating in the regulation of LH and/or FSH levels by action at the pituitary. This evidence includes altered secretion of gonadotropins from the anterior pituitary cells or tissue in vitro when exposed to the peptide. Additionally, modification of GnRH-stimulated LH/FSH secretion has been observed. Furthermore, there is potential for a separately modulated interaction with the primed response. Another potential of action is by interaction among non-GnRH peptides on gonadotropin-regulating processes, although there are no good data available on this aspect. Other observations, consistent with a pituitary role for the peptides in modulation of LH, include detection of the peptides in portal blood, detection of high-affinity receptors or receptor mRNA in the pituitary, and detection of intrapituitary peptide or peptide mRNA in the pituitary. The modulation by steroids of both concentrations and type of activities provides a further level of physiological refinement. There is, however, some confusion regarding the involvement of these peptides in gonadotropin control. The reasons can be seen by considering aspects of investigations. There are experimental variations such as 1) species studied, e.g., NPY has been reported to have an effect on LH secretion from rat cells (168) but not on sheep anterior pituitary tissue (64), and substance P inhibits GnRH-stimulated release from rat cells (182) but potentiates the response in prepubertal porcine cells (92); 2) the steroidal conditions under which the study is performed, e.g., NPY has opposite effects in certain endocrine environments, augmenting GnRH-stimulated LH release in proestrus-like conditions (168), and inhibiting in metestrus-like environment (66); 3) the type of cell preparation, e.g., responsiveness to substance P might depend on whether cells in overnight culture were in separated or clustered state (91); 4) the time course considered, e.g., oxytocin that might induce marked LH release from pituitary cells after a longer length of incubation than GnRH requires (68); 5) length of exposure to peptide, e.g., endothelin that augmented or inhibited GnRH-stimulated LH release (50); 6) In addition, it is possible that the traditional endpoint selected in such studies, namely, observation of gonadotropin secretion, is not necessarily the most important for these peptides (56, 81, 117). Unfortunately, at this stage a definitive answer to the question "What do the peptides actually do?" cannot be provided and we remain tantalized by the glimpses of potential roles. Perhaps in a few years an updated review will be able to include a more complete answer. It is necessary for the full understanding of LH control that not only the properties of the peptides in isolation be characterized but also their interactions.

Effects of administration of oxytocin in association with gonadotropin-releasing hormone on luteinizing hormone levels in rats in vivo.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and oxytocin both stimulate the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH), although with different characteristics. Therefore, interaction between oxytocin and GnRH in the control of LH may be postulated. We developed models for investigating whether oxytocin can modulate GnRH action on LH in vivo. Pentobarbitone is known to pharmacologically isolate the pituitary from hypothalamic GnRH. We found that after pentobarbitone anesthesia of female rats at proestrus, oxytocin caused a synergistically enhanced LH response to administered GnRH (p < 0.04). In a second series of experiments, female proestrous rats were anesthetized with althesin. This anesthetic allows transport of endogenous GnRH from the hypothalamus to the pituitary. In control animals, which received no exogenous hormone, there was a surge in the mean LH concentration on the evening of proestrus, indicating the presence of endogenous GnRH activity. Thus, the novel model enables detection of interactions of administered hormones with endogenous GnRH. Administration of GnRH plus oxytocin in the afternoon of proestrus caused a reduction (p < 0.01) in the mean level of LH observed in the evening. The reduction was larger than if GnRH alone was administered. Following althesin anesthesia, rats sometimes had low LH levels on the afternoon of proestrus. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of rats that received oxytocin plus GnRH and had low LH levels and the number with low LH levels in the control group (p < 0.02). Neither of the hormones administered alone had a significant effect. Thus, it appears that oxytocin accentuated the effect of GnRH in reducing LH concentrations in althesin-anesthetized rats.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of zinc sulfate concentration and feeding frequency on ruminal protozoal numbers, fermentation patterns and amino acid passage in steers.

Effects of zinc sulfate (0 vs 1,142 ppm supplemental zinc from zinc sulfate) and feeding frequency (1 x vs 12x daily) on ruminal protozoa numbers, fermentation patterns and amino acid passage were investigated using four ruminally and abomasally cannulated mature Jersey steers in a 4 x 4 Latin square experiment. Steers (530 kg) were fed a 50:50 roughage:concentrate diet at 1.5 times their NEm requirement. Experimental periods were 14 d in duration; ruminal, abomasal and fecal samples were collected at 6-h intervals during the last 3 d of each period. Protozoa numbers tended to be lowest (1.82 x 10(6)/ml) in steers fed zinc 1 x and tended to be highest (3.83 x 10(6)/ml) in steers fed zinc 12 x daily (P less than .10). Frequent feeding decreased ruminal pH .24 units and increased total VFA 20.7%, ammonia 22.7% and ruminal digestion of dietary amino acids (AA) 61.6% (P less than .05). Zinc supplementation decreased ruminal digestion of dietary AA 35.8% (P less than .05) and the abomasal passage of bacterial OM and AA 21.2% (P less than .05) and increased ruminal output of amino acids as a percentage of intake 15.1% (P less than .05). Although it increased escape of dietary AA, zinc sulfate decreased postruminal passage of bacterial AA and resulted in a net negative effect on total postruminal AA passage as a percentage of intake. The effects of zinc on ruminal AA digestion may be more closely related to an interaction of zinc with dietary CP rather than to an effect of Zn on ruminal microbial populations.

Gonadotrophin-releasing activity of neurohypophysial hormones: I. Potential for modulation of pituitary hormone secretion in rats.

Neurohypophysial hormones have been implicated in the control of anterior pituitary function, and oxytocin has been shown to stimulate gonadotrophin excretion and ovarian follicular development in certain species. To determine the role of neurohypophysial peptides in the control of gonadotrophin release, their actions on LH and FSH secretion were analysed in rats in vivo and in vitro. In adult female rats, administration of oxytocin during early pro-oestrus advanced the spontaneous LH surge and markedly increased peripheral LH levels at 15.00 h compared with control animals. In cultured pituitary cells from adult female rats, oxytocin and vasopressin elicited dose-related increases in LH and FSH release. Such responses were not affected by a potent gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist that abolished GnRH agonist-induced release of LH and FSH. Oxytocin did not enhance GnRH agonist-stimulated gonadotrophin release to the same extent as it increased basal secretion, but at low concentrations of GnRH agonist the effects were additive. The gonadotrophin responses to oxytocin and vasopressin were inhibited by the specific neurohypophysial hormone antagonists, [d(CH2)5D-Ile2,Ile4,Arg8]vasopressin and [d(CH2)5Tyr (Me),Arg8]vasopressin. These results provide direct evidence that neurohypophysial hormones can stimulate gonadotrophin secretion through a receptor system distinct from the GnRH receptor. Such a mechanism could represent a complementary hypothalamic control system for long-term modulation of LH and FSH secretion by exerting a basal or tonic influence on gonadotrophin production.